From: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
To: 'Chao Gao' <chao.gao@intel.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch v4 1/8] ioreq: remove most 'buf' parameter from static functions
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 14:44:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff33a474affb41f3a6c295a1e039a66a@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1512546614-9937-2-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chao Gao [mailto:chao.gao@intel.com]
> Sent: 06 December 2017 07:50
> To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> Cc: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>; Andrew Cooper
> <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>; Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>; Paul
> Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
> Subject: [RFC Patch v4 1/8] ioreq: remove most 'buf' parameter from static
> functions
>
> It is a preparation to support multiple IOREQ pages.
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
> ---
> v4:
> -new
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/hvm/ioreq.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> -------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/ioreq.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/ioreq.c
> index d991ac9..a879f20 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/ioreq.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/ioreq.c
> @@ -237,10 +237,9 @@ static void hvm_free_ioreq_gfn(struct
> hvm_ioreq_server *s, gfn_t gfn)
> set_bit(i, &d->arch.hvm_domain.ioreq_gfn.mask);
> }
>
> -static void hvm_unmap_ioreq_gfn(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s, bool buf)
> +static void hvm_unmap_ioreq_gfn(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s,
> + struct hvm_ioreq_page *iorp)
> {
> - struct hvm_ioreq_page *iorp = buf ? &s->bufioreq : &s->ioreq;
> -
I don't really like this approach. I'd prefer swapping the bool for an unsigned page index, where we follow the convention adopted in hvm_get_ioreq_server_frame() for which macros exist: 0 equating to the bufioreq page, 1+ for the struct-per-cpu pages.
Paul
> if ( gfn_eq(iorp->gfn, INVALID_GFN) )
> return;
>
> @@ -289,15 +288,15 @@ static int hvm_map_ioreq_gfn(struct
> hvm_ioreq_server *s, bool buf)
> &iorp->va);
>
> if ( rc )
> - hvm_unmap_ioreq_gfn(s, buf);
> + hvm_unmap_ioreq_gfn(s, iorp);
>
> return rc;
> }
>
> -static int hvm_alloc_ioreq_mfn(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s, bool buf)
> +static int hvm_alloc_ioreq_mfn(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s,
> + struct hvm_ioreq_page *iorp)
> {
> struct domain *currd = current->domain;
> - struct hvm_ioreq_page *iorp = buf ? &s->bufioreq : &s->ioreq;
>
> if ( iorp->page )
> {
> @@ -344,10 +343,9 @@ static int hvm_alloc_ioreq_mfn(struct
> hvm_ioreq_server *s, bool buf)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void hvm_free_ioreq_mfn(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s, bool buf)
> +static void hvm_free_ioreq_mfn(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s,
> + struct hvm_ioreq_page *iorp)
> {
> - struct hvm_ioreq_page *iorp = buf ? &s->bufioreq : &s->ioreq;
> -
> if ( !iorp->page )
> return;
>
> @@ -380,11 +378,11 @@ bool is_ioreq_server_page(struct domain *d, const
> struct page_info *page)
> return found;
> }
>
> -static void hvm_remove_ioreq_gfn(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s, bool buf)
> +static void hvm_remove_ioreq_gfn(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s,
> + struct hvm_ioreq_page *iorp)
>
> {
> struct domain *d = s->domain;
> - struct hvm_ioreq_page *iorp = buf ? &s->bufioreq : &s->ioreq;
>
> if ( IS_DEFAULT(s) || gfn_eq(iorp->gfn, INVALID_GFN) )
> return;
> @@ -395,10 +393,10 @@ static void hvm_remove_ioreq_gfn(struct
> hvm_ioreq_server *s, bool buf)
> clear_page(iorp->va);
> }
>
> -static int hvm_add_ioreq_gfn(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s, bool buf)
> +static int hvm_add_ioreq_gfn(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s,
> + struct hvm_ioreq_page *iorp)
> {
> struct domain *d = s->domain;
> - struct hvm_ioreq_page *iorp = buf ? &s->bufioreq : &s->ioreq;
> int rc;
>
> if ( IS_DEFAULT(s) || gfn_eq(iorp->gfn, INVALID_GFN) )
> @@ -550,36 +548,36 @@ static int hvm_ioreq_server_map_pages(struct
> hvm_ioreq_server *s)
> rc = hvm_map_ioreq_gfn(s, true);
>
> if ( rc )
> - hvm_unmap_ioreq_gfn(s, false);
> + hvm_unmap_ioreq_gfn(s, &s->ioreq);
>
> return rc;
> }
>
> static void hvm_ioreq_server_unmap_pages(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s)
> {
> - hvm_unmap_ioreq_gfn(s, true);
> - hvm_unmap_ioreq_gfn(s, false);
> + hvm_unmap_ioreq_gfn(s, &s->ioreq);
> + hvm_unmap_ioreq_gfn(s, &s->bufioreq);
> }
>
> static int hvm_ioreq_server_alloc_pages(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s)
> {
> int rc;
>
> - rc = hvm_alloc_ioreq_mfn(s, false);
> + rc = hvm_alloc_ioreq_mfn(s, &s->ioreq);
>
> if ( !rc && (s->bufioreq_handling != HVM_IOREQSRV_BUFIOREQ_OFF) )
> - rc = hvm_alloc_ioreq_mfn(s, true);
> + rc = hvm_alloc_ioreq_mfn(s, &s->bufioreq);
>
> if ( rc )
> - hvm_free_ioreq_mfn(s, false);
> + hvm_free_ioreq_mfn(s, &s->ioreq);
>
> return rc;
> }
>
> static void hvm_ioreq_server_free_pages(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s)
> {
> - hvm_free_ioreq_mfn(s, true);
> - hvm_free_ioreq_mfn(s, false);
> + hvm_free_ioreq_mfn(s, &s->bufioreq);
> + hvm_free_ioreq_mfn(s, &s->ioreq);
> }
>
> static void hvm_ioreq_server_free_rangesets(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s)
> @@ -646,8 +644,8 @@ static void hvm_ioreq_server_enable(struct
> hvm_ioreq_server *s)
> if ( s->enabled )
> goto done;
>
> - hvm_remove_ioreq_gfn(s, false);
> - hvm_remove_ioreq_gfn(s, true);
> + hvm_remove_ioreq_gfn(s, &s->ioreq);
> + hvm_remove_ioreq_gfn(s, &s->bufioreq);
>
> s->enabled = true;
>
> @@ -667,8 +665,8 @@ static void hvm_ioreq_server_disable(struct
> hvm_ioreq_server *s)
> if ( !s->enabled )
> goto done;
>
> - hvm_add_ioreq_gfn(s, true);
> - hvm_add_ioreq_gfn(s, false);
> + hvm_add_ioreq_gfn(s, &s->bufioreq);
> + hvm_add_ioreq_gfn(s, &s->ioreq);
>
> s->enabled = false;
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-06 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-06 7:50 [RFC Patch v4 0/8] Extend resources to support more vcpus in single VM Chao Gao
2017-12-06 7:50 ` [RFC Patch v4 1/8] ioreq: remove most 'buf' parameter from static functions Chao Gao
2017-12-06 14:44 ` Paul Durrant [this message]
2017-12-06 8:37 ` Chao Gao
2017-12-06 7:50 ` [RFC Patch v4 2/8] ioreq: bump the number of IOREQ page to 4 pages Chao Gao
2017-12-06 15:04 ` Paul Durrant
2017-12-06 9:02 ` Chao Gao
2017-12-06 16:10 ` Paul Durrant
2017-12-07 8:41 ` Paul Durrant
2017-12-07 6:56 ` Chao Gao
2017-12-08 11:06 ` Paul Durrant
2017-12-12 1:03 ` Chao Gao
2017-12-12 9:07 ` Paul Durrant
2017-12-12 23:39 ` Chao Gao
2017-12-13 10:49 ` Paul Durrant
2017-12-13 17:50 ` Paul Durrant
2017-12-14 14:50 ` Paul Durrant
2017-12-15 0:35 ` Chao Gao
2017-12-15 9:40 ` Paul Durrant
2018-04-18 8:19 ` Jan Beulich
2017-12-06 7:50 ` [RFC Patch v4 3/8] xl/acpi: unify the computation of lapic_id Chao Gao
2018-02-22 18:05 ` Wei Liu
2017-12-06 7:50 ` [RFC Patch v4 4/8] hvmloader: boot cpu through broadcast Chao Gao
2018-02-22 18:44 ` Wei Liu
2018-02-23 8:41 ` Jan Beulich
2018-02-23 16:42 ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-02-24 5:49 ` Chao Gao
2018-02-26 8:28 ` Jan Beulich
2018-02-26 12:33 ` Chao Gao
2018-02-26 14:19 ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-04-18 8:38 ` Jan Beulich
2018-04-18 11:20 ` Chao Gao
2018-04-18 11:50 ` Jan Beulich
2017-12-06 7:50 ` [RFC Patch v4 5/8] Tool/ACPI: DSDT extension to support more vcpus Chao Gao
2017-12-06 7:50 ` [RFC Patch v4 6/8] hvmload: Add x2apic entry support in the MADT and SRAT build Chao Gao
2018-04-18 8:48 ` Jan Beulich
2017-12-06 7:50 ` [RFC Patch v4 7/8] x86/hvm: bump the number of pages of shadow memory Chao Gao
2018-02-27 14:17 ` George Dunlap
2018-04-18 8:53 ` Jan Beulich
2018-04-18 11:39 ` Chao Gao
2018-04-18 11:50 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-04-18 11:59 ` Jan Beulich
2017-12-06 7:50 ` [RFC Patch v4 8/8] x86/hvm: bump the maximum number of vcpus to 512 Chao Gao
2018-02-22 18:46 ` Wei Liu
2018-02-23 8:50 ` Jan Beulich
2018-02-23 17:18 ` Wei Liu
2018-02-23 18:11 ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-02-24 6:26 ` Chao Gao
2018-02-26 8:26 ` Jan Beulich
2018-02-26 13:11 ` Chao Gao
2018-02-26 16:10 ` Jan Beulich
2018-03-01 5:21 ` Chao Gao
2018-03-01 7:17 ` Juergen Gross
2018-03-01 7:37 ` Jan Beulich
2018-03-01 7:11 ` Chao Gao
2018-02-27 14:59 ` George Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff33a474affb41f3a6c295a1e039a66a@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net \
--to=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).