xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Marcus Granado <Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com>,
	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
	Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@recoil.org>,
	George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>,
	Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08 of 10 v2] libxl: automatic placement deals with node-affinity
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:07:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff98e6bcc0dd18f6b97a.1355944044@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <patchbomb.1355944036@Solace>

Which basically means the following two things:
 1) during domain creation, it is the node-affinity of
    the domain --rather than the vcpu-affinities of its
    VCPUs-- that is affected by automatic placement;
 2) during automatic placement, when counting how many
    VCPUs are already "bound" to a placement candidate
    (as part of the process of choosing the best
    candidate), both vcpu-affinity and node-affinity
    are considered.

Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Acked-by: Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>

diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
@@ -133,13 +133,13 @@ static int numa_place_domain(libxl__gc *
 {
     int found;
     libxl__numa_candidate candidate;
-    libxl_bitmap candidate_nodemap;
+    libxl_bitmap cpupool_nodemap;
     libxl_cpupoolinfo cpupool_info;
     int i, cpupool, rc = 0;
     uint32_t memkb;
 
     libxl__numa_candidate_init(&candidate);
-    libxl_bitmap_init(&candidate_nodemap);
+    libxl_bitmap_init(&cpupool_nodemap);
 
     /*
      * Extract the cpumap from the cpupool the domain belong to. In fact,
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int numa_place_domain(libxl__gc *
     rc = libxl_domain_need_memory(CTX, info, &memkb);
     if (rc)
         goto out;
-    if (libxl_node_bitmap_alloc(CTX, &candidate_nodemap, 0)) {
+    if (libxl_node_bitmap_alloc(CTX, &cpupool_nodemap, 0)) {
         rc = ERROR_FAIL;
         goto out;
     }
@@ -174,17 +174,19 @@ static int numa_place_domain(libxl__gc *
     if (found == 0)
         goto out;
 
-    /* Map the candidate's node map to the domain's info->cpumap */
-    libxl__numa_candidate_get_nodemap(gc, &candidate, &candidate_nodemap);
-    rc = libxl_nodemap_to_cpumap(CTX, &candidate_nodemap, &info->cpumap);
+    /* Map the candidate's node map to the domain's info->nodemap */
+    libxl__numa_candidate_get_nodemap(gc, &candidate, &info->nodemap);
+
+    /* Avoid trying to set the affinity to nodes that might be in the
+     * candidate's nodemap but out of our cpupool. */
+    rc = libxl_cpumap_to_nodemap(CTX, &cpupool_info.cpumap,
+                                 &cpupool_nodemap);
     if (rc)
         goto out;
 
-    /* Avoid trying to set the affinity to cpus that might be in the
-     * nodemap but not in our cpupool. */
-    libxl_for_each_set_bit(i, info->cpumap) {
-        if (!libxl_bitmap_test(&cpupool_info.cpumap, i))
-            libxl_bitmap_reset(&info->cpumap, i);
+    libxl_for_each_set_bit(i, info->nodemap) {
+        if (!libxl_bitmap_test(&cpupool_nodemap, i))
+            libxl_bitmap_reset(&info->nodemap, i);
     }
 
     LOG(DETAIL, "NUMA placement candidate with %d nodes, %d cpus and "
@@ -193,7 +195,7 @@ static int numa_place_domain(libxl__gc *
 
  out:
     libxl__numa_candidate_dispose(&candidate);
-    libxl_bitmap_dispose(&candidate_nodemap);
+    libxl_bitmap_dispose(&cpupool_nodemap);
     libxl_cpupoolinfo_dispose(&cpupool_info);
     return rc;
 }
@@ -211,10 +213,10 @@ int libxl__build_pre(libxl__gc *gc, uint
     /*
      * Check if the domain has any CPU affinity. If not, try to build
      * up one. In case numa_place_domain() find at least a suitable
-     * candidate, it will affect info->cpumap accordingly; if it
+     * candidate, it will affect info->nodemap accordingly; if it
      * does not, it just leaves it as it is. This means (unless
      * some weird error manifests) the subsequent call to
-     * libxl_set_vcpuaffinity_all() will do the actual placement,
+     * libxl_domain_set_nodeaffinity() will do the actual placement,
      * whatever that turns out to be.
      */
     if (libxl_defbool_val(info->numa_placement)) {
diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_numa.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_numa.c
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_numa.c
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_numa.c
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static int nr_vcpus_on_nodes(libxl__gc *
                              int vcpus_on_node[])
 {
     libxl_dominfo *dinfo = NULL;
-    libxl_bitmap vcpu_nodemap;
+    libxl_bitmap dom_nodemap, vcpu_nodemap;
     int nr_doms, nr_cpus;
     int i, j, k;
 
@@ -197,6 +197,12 @@ static int nr_vcpus_on_nodes(libxl__gc *
         return ERROR_FAIL;
     }
 
+    if (libxl_node_bitmap_alloc(CTX, &dom_nodemap, 0) < 0) {
+        libxl_bitmap_dispose(&vcpu_nodemap);
+        libxl_dominfo_list_free(dinfo, nr_doms);
+        return ERROR_FAIL;
+    }
+
     for (i = 0; i < nr_doms; i++) {
         libxl_vcpuinfo *vinfo;
         int nr_dom_vcpus;
@@ -205,14 +211,21 @@ static int nr_vcpus_on_nodes(libxl__gc *
         if (vinfo == NULL)
             continue;
 
+        /* Retrieve the domain's node-affinity map */
+        libxl_domain_get_nodeaffinity(CTX, dinfo[i].domid, &dom_nodemap);
+
         for (j = 0; j < nr_dom_vcpus; j++) {
-            /* For each vcpu of each domain, increment the elements of
-             * the array corresponding to the nodes where the vcpu runs */
+            /*
+             * For each vcpu of each domain, it must have both vcpu-affinity
+             * and node-affinity to (a pcpu belonging to) a certain node to
+             * cause an increment in the corresponding element of the array.
+             */
             libxl_bitmap_set_none(&vcpu_nodemap);
             libxl_for_each_set_bit(k, vinfo[j].cpumap) {
                 int node = tinfo[k].node;
 
                 if (libxl_bitmap_test(suitable_cpumap, k) &&
+                    libxl_bitmap_test(&dom_nodemap, node) &&
                     !libxl_bitmap_test(&vcpu_nodemap, node)) {
                     libxl_bitmap_set(&vcpu_nodemap, node);
                     vcpus_on_node[node]++;
@@ -223,6 +236,7 @@ static int nr_vcpus_on_nodes(libxl__gc *
         libxl_vcpuinfo_list_free(vinfo, nr_dom_vcpus);
     }
 
+    libxl_bitmap_dispose(&dom_nodemap);
     libxl_bitmap_dispose(&vcpu_nodemap);
     libxl_dominfo_list_free(dinfo, nr_doms);
     return 0;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-12-19 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-19 19:07 [PATCH 00 of 10 v2] NUMA aware credit scheduling Dario Faggioli
2012-12-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 01 of 10 v2] xen, libxc: rename xenctl_cpumap to xenctl_bitmap Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20  9:17   ` Jan Beulich
2012-12-20  9:35     ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 02 of 10 v2] xen, libxc: introduce node maps and masks Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20  9:18   ` Jan Beulich
2012-12-20  9:55     ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20 14:33     ` George Dunlap
2012-12-20 14:52       ` Jan Beulich
2012-12-20 15:13         ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 03 of 10 v2] xen: sched_credit: let the scheduler know about node-affinity Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20  6:44   ` Juergen Gross
2012-12-20  8:16     ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20  8:25       ` Juergen Gross
2012-12-20  8:33         ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20  8:39           ` Juergen Gross
2012-12-20  8:58             ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20 15:28             ` George Dunlap
2012-12-20 16:00               ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20  9:22           ` Jan Beulich
2012-12-20 15:56   ` George Dunlap
2012-12-20 17:12     ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20 16:48   ` George Dunlap
2012-12-20 18:18     ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-21 14:29       ` George Dunlap
2012-12-21 16:07         ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20 20:21   ` George Dunlap
2012-12-21  0:18     ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-21 14:56       ` George Dunlap
2012-12-21 16:13         ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 04 of 10 v2] xen: allow for explicitly specifying node-affinity Dario Faggioli
2012-12-21 15:17   ` George Dunlap
2012-12-21 16:17     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-01-03 16:05     ` Daniel De Graaf
2012-12-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 05 of 10 v2] libxc: " Dario Faggioli
2012-12-21 15:19   ` George Dunlap
2012-12-21 16:27     ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 06 of 10 v2] libxl: " Dario Faggioli
2012-12-21 15:30   ` George Dunlap
2012-12-21 16:18     ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-21 17:02       ` Ian Jackson
2012-12-21 17:09         ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 07 of 10 v2] libxl: optimize the calculation of how many VCPUs can run on a candidate Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20  8:41   ` Ian Campbell
2012-12-20  9:24     ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-21 16:00   ` George Dunlap
2012-12-21 16:23     ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-19 19:07 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2012-12-21 16:22   ` [PATCH 08 of 10 v2] libxl: automatic placement deals with node-affinity George Dunlap
2012-12-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 09 of 10 v2] xl: add node-affinity to the output of `xl list` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-21 16:34   ` George Dunlap
2012-12-21 16:54     ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 10 of 10 v2] docs: rearrange and update NUMA placement documentation Dario Faggioli
2012-12-19 23:16 ` [PATCH 00 of 10 v2] NUMA aware credit scheduling Dario Faggioli
2013-01-11 12:19 ` Ian Campbell
2013-01-11 13:57   ` Dario Faggioli
2013-01-11 14:09     ` Ian Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ff98e6bcc0dd18f6b97a.1355944044@Solace \
    --to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=anil@recoil.org \
    --cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
    --cc=dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=msw@amazon.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).