xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: yingbin wang <yingbin.wangyb@gmail.com>
To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: network performance drop heavily in xen 4.0 release
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:24:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <k2oacd07b8d1004152124l2778fda7nbed7b38fb8cddb0d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C7ED0287.116B2%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>

sorry, I forgot to report the performance of xen4.0+kernel2.6.18.8.

xen4.0+kernel2.6.18.8:
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]  0.0-16.3 sec  1.79 GBytes    941 Mbits/sec

This combination can only meet some of our needs.

the reason why we didn't use 2.6.18.8:
  1. Our storage application is base on NBD, which will goto deadlock
on 2.6.18.8 when nbd-client and nbd-server are deployed on the same
server.
  2. Hard disk frequently offline

so we want to upgrade to kernel2.6.31.
we also try xen4.0+kernel2.6.31.12(gentoo-xen-kernel patch). the
performance is acceptable, but blktap2(support VHD) not work.
has anybody solve the problem in xen4.0+kernel2.6.31.13?

Cheers,
wyb

2010/4/16 Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>:
> On 15/04/2010 17:39, "yingbin wang" <yingbin.wangyb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>     I report a Bug !!!  We have just upgraded to
>> xen4.0+kernel2.6.31.13 recently.  however , fond that the network
>> performance drop heavily in dom0  (nearly Reduced by 2/3 vs
>> xen3.4.2+kernel2.6.18.8 ) .
>
> How does xen4.0+kernel2.6.18.8 perform? The regression is more likely in the
> dom0 kernel than Xen itself. And you don't *have* to upgrade both.
>
>  -- Keir
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-16  4:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <k2iacd07b8d1004150928k3b9581e2raa9eb1c034a36d65@mail.gmail.com>
2010-04-15 16:39 ` network performance drop heavily in xen 4.0 release yingbin wang
2010-04-15 16:51   ` Keir Fraser
2010-04-16  4:24     ` yingbin wang [this message]
2010-04-16  5:56       ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-16  8:49   ` yingbin wang
2010-04-18 18:55     ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-24  6:42       ` yingbin wang
2010-04-24 11:18         ` Re: network performance drop heavily in xen 4.0 release [SOLVED] Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-24 14:20         ` Re: network performance drop heavily in xen 4.0 release Ronaldo C. A. Chaves
2010-04-24 14:59           ` yingbin wang
2010-04-24 15:07             ` Ronaldo C. A. Chaves
2010-04-24 15:57               ` listmail
2010-04-24 16:03                 ` listmail
2010-04-24 16:22                   ` listmail
2010-04-26 20:23         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-05-09 17:23         ` Problem with /etc/init.d/xendomains Carsten Schiers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=k2oacd07b8d1004152124l2778fda7nbed7b38fb8cddb0d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yingbin.wangyb@gmail.com \
    --cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).