From: yingbin wang <yingbin.wangyb@gmail.com>
To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: network performance drop heavily in xen 4.0 release
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:24:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <k2oacd07b8d1004152124l2778fda7nbed7b38fb8cddb0d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C7ED0287.116B2%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
sorry, I forgot to report the performance of xen4.0+kernel2.6.18.8.
xen4.0+kernel2.6.18.8:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.0-16.3 sec 1.79 GBytes 941 Mbits/sec
This combination can only meet some of our needs.
the reason why we didn't use 2.6.18.8:
1. Our storage application is base on NBD, which will goto deadlock
on 2.6.18.8 when nbd-client and nbd-server are deployed on the same
server.
2. Hard disk frequently offline
so we want to upgrade to kernel2.6.31.
we also try xen4.0+kernel2.6.31.12(gentoo-xen-kernel patch). the
performance is acceptable, but blktap2(support VHD) not work.
has anybody solve the problem in xen4.0+kernel2.6.31.13?
Cheers,
wyb
2010/4/16 Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>:
> On 15/04/2010 17:39, "yingbin wang" <yingbin.wangyb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I report a Bug !!! We have just upgraded to
>> xen4.0+kernel2.6.31.13 recently. however , fond that the network
>> performance drop heavily in dom0 (nearly Reduced by 2/3 vs
>> xen3.4.2+kernel2.6.18.8 ) .
>
> How does xen4.0+kernel2.6.18.8 perform? The regression is more likely in the
> dom0 kernel than Xen itself. And you don't *have* to upgrade both.
>
> -- Keir
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-16 4:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <k2iacd07b8d1004150928k3b9581e2raa9eb1c034a36d65@mail.gmail.com>
2010-04-15 16:39 ` network performance drop heavily in xen 4.0 release yingbin wang
2010-04-15 16:51 ` Keir Fraser
2010-04-16 4:24 ` yingbin wang [this message]
2010-04-16 5:56 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-16 8:49 ` yingbin wang
2010-04-18 18:55 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-24 6:42 ` yingbin wang
2010-04-24 11:18 ` Re: network performance drop heavily in xen 4.0 release [SOLVED] Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-24 14:20 ` Re: network performance drop heavily in xen 4.0 release Ronaldo C. A. Chaves
2010-04-24 14:59 ` yingbin wang
2010-04-24 15:07 ` Ronaldo C. A. Chaves
2010-04-24 15:57 ` listmail
2010-04-24 16:03 ` listmail
2010-04-24 16:22 ` listmail
2010-04-26 20:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-05-09 17:23 ` Problem with /etc/init.d/xendomains Carsten Schiers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=k2oacd07b8d1004152124l2778fda7nbed7b38fb8cddb0d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yingbin.wangyb@gmail.com \
--cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).