From: Jonathan Creekmore <jonathan.creekmore@gmail.com>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, david.vrabel@citrix.com,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
ian.campbell@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] libxenstore: prefer using the character device
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:34:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2pp28wjwh.fsf@Nebula.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21983.20700.957792.401545@mariner.uk.xensource.com> (Ian Jackson's message of "Thu, 27 Aug 2015 19:03:08 +0100")
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> writes:
> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] libxenstore: prefer
> using the character device"):
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 09:04:38AM -0500, Jonathan Creekmore
>> wrote:
>> > With the addition of FMODE_ATOMIC_POS in the Linux 3.14
>> > kernel, concurrent blocking file accesses to a single open
>> > file descriptor can cause a deadlock trying to grab the file
>> > position lock. If a watch has been set up, causing a
>> > read_thread to blocking read on the file descriptor, then
>> > future writes that would cause the background read to
>> > complete will block waiting on the file position lock before
>> > they can execute. This race condition only occurs when
>> > libxenstore is accessing the xenstore daemon through the
>> > /proc/xen/xenbus file and not through the unix domain socket,
>> > which is the case when the xenstore daemon is running as a
>> > stub domain or when oxenstored is passed
>> > --disable-socket. Accessing the daemon from the true
>> > character device also does not exhibit this problem. On
>> > Linux, prefer using the character device file over the proc
>> > file if the character device exists.
>
> I confess I still see this as working around a kernel bug. Only
> this time we are switching from a buggy to non-buggy kernel
> interface.
>
> Why don't we have the kernel provide only non-buggy interfaces ?
I was just trying to implement what David suggested; CC'ing him on
this as well.
>
>> > diff --git a/tools/xenstore/xs_lib.c
>> > b/tools/xenstore/xs_lib.c index af4f75a..0c7744e 100644 ---
>> > a/tools/xenstore/xs_lib.c +++ b/tools/xenstore/xs_lib.c @@
>> > -81,6 +81,8 @@ const char *xs_domain_dev(void)
>> > #if defined(__RUMPUSER_XEN__) || defined(__RUMPRUN__) return
>> > "/dev/xen/xenbus"; #elif defined(__linux__)
>> > + if (access("/dev/xen/xenbus", F_OK) == 0) +
>> > return "/dev/xen/xenbus";
>
> Also, previously xs_domain_dev was a function which simply
> returned a static value. I feel vaguely uneasy at putting this
> kind of autodetection logic here.
Not entirely; the existing code queried an environment variable first
and, only if that was not set, did it return a static value. I added the
autodetection logic to fall back in the case where, for some reason,
/dev/xen/xenbus did not exist. Handling that kind of a fallback at a
higher layer would be a larger refactor to probe for the existence of
the character device first.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-27 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-13 21:44 [PATCH] libxenstore: Use poll() with a non-blocking read() Jonathan Creekmore
2015-08-16 8:59 ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-17 0:46 ` Jonathan Creekmore
2015-08-17 13:44 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-08-18 9:48 ` David Vrabel
2015-08-18 14:49 ` Jonathan Creekmore
2015-08-27 14:04 ` [PATCH v2] libxenstore: prefer using the character device Jonathan Creekmore
2015-08-27 16:56 ` Wei Liu
2015-08-27 18:03 ` Ian Jackson
2015-08-27 20:34 ` Jonathan Creekmore [this message]
2015-08-28 9:57 ` David Vrabel
2015-08-31 18:59 ` Jonathan Creekmore
2015-09-01 10:56 ` Wei Liu
2015-09-01 11:28 ` Ian Jackson
2015-09-01 12:03 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2pp28wjwh.fsf@Nebula.lan \
--to=jonathan.creekmore@gmail.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).