* [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL
@ 2016-12-12 7:58 ` osstest service owner
2016-12-12 11:47 ` Ian Jackson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: osstest service owner @ 2016-12-12 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel, osstest-admin
flight 103161 xen-4.5-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103161/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102721
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102721
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102721
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102721
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102721
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 5 xen-install fail in 103051 pass in 103161
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 16 guest-start.2 fail in 103051 pass in 103161
test-amd64-amd64-amd64-pvgrub 10 guest-start fail pass in 103051
test-amd64-i386-libvirt 11 guest-start fail pass in 103051
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail pass in 103051
test-amd64-i386-pair 20 guest-start/debian fail pass in 103051
test-amd64-amd64-pygrub 10 guest-start fail pass in 103051
test-amd64-i386-migrupgrade 20 guest-start/debian fail pass in 103051
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 11 guest-start/redhat.repeat fail pass in 103051
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 19 guest-start.2 fail pass in 103051
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 11 guest-start/redhat.repeat fail pass in 103051
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 11 guest-start/redhat.repeat fail pass in 103051
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel 16 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2 fail pass in 103051
test-amd64-i386-xl-raw 18 guest-start/debian.repeat fail pass in 103051
test-amd64-i386-rumprun-i386 16 rumprun-demo-xenstorels/xenstorels.repeat fail pass in 103051
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 15 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail pass in 103051
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop fail blocked in 102721
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 13 guest-localmigrate fail in 103051 like 102721
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 15 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail in 103051 like 102721
test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds 6 xen-boot fail like 102721
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13 saverestore-support-check fail like 102721
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop fail like 102721
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop fail like 102721
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop fail like 102721
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 11 guest-start fail like 102721
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt 12 migrate-support-check fail in 103051 never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 18 xtf/test-hvm32-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 18 xtf/test-hvm32-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 29 xtf/test-hvm32pae-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 29 xtf/test-hvm32pae-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 35 xtf/test-hvm32pse-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 39 xtf/test-hvm64-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 35 xtf/test-hvm32pse-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 39 xtf/test-hvm64-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel 11 guest-start fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 18 xtf/test-hvm32-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 18 xtf/test-hvm32-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 51 xtf/test-hvm64-xsa-195 fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 51 xtf/test-hvm64-xsa-195 fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-amd 11 guest-start fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 29 xtf/test-hvm32pae-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 35 xtf/test-hvm32pse-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 29 xtf/test-hvm32pae-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 39 xtf/test-hvm64-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 11 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 35 xtf/test-hvm32pse-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 39 xtf/test-hvm64-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 16 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2 fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 51 xtf/test-hvm64-xsa-195 fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 51 xtf/test-hvm64-xsa-195 fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 10 guest-start fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 51 xtf/test-hvm64-xsa-195 fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 10 guest-start fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 10 guest-start fail never pass
version targeted for testing:
xen 27be856265352c259c597ff696766a1668cf7564
baseline version:
xen cc325c0bd56d5cc327f8a426d661cc1a2f3a52bd
Last test of basis 102721 2016-11-29 22:49:05 Z 12 days
Failing since 102767 2016-12-01 22:47:44 Z 10 days 9 attempts
Testing same since 103051 2016-12-07 23:19:17 Z 4 days 3 attempts
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
jobs:
build-amd64-xtf pass
build-amd64 pass
build-armhf pass
build-i386 pass
build-amd64-libvirt pass
build-armhf-libvirt pass
build-i386-libvirt pass
build-amd64-prev pass
build-i386-prev pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-armhf-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
build-amd64-rumprun pass
build-i386-rumprun pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 fail
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 fail
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 fail
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 fail
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-xl pass
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-amd fail
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd fail
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-rumprun-amd64 pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck pass
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 pass
test-amd64-i386-rumprun-i386 fail
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt pass
test-amd64-i386-libvirt fail
test-amd64-amd64-migrupgrade pass
test-amd64-i386-migrupgrade fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-multivcpu pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu pass
test-amd64-amd64-pair pass
test-amd64-i386-pair fail
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair pass
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair pass
test-amd64-amd64-amd64-pvgrub fail
test-amd64-amd64-i386-pvgrub pass
test-amd64-amd64-pygrub fail
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qcow2 pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-raw fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds fail
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 pass
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org
logs: /home/logs/logs
images: /home/logs/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs
Explanation of these reports, and of osstest in general, is at
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README.email;hb=master
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=master
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Not pushing.
------------------------------------------------------------
commit 27be856265352c259c597ff696766a1668cf7564
Author: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Date: Wed Dec 7 16:54:35 2016 +0000
QEMU_TAG update
commit bdf3ef18a3f5d7f2e6b198838f6e77f237d3e3f2
Author: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu Mar 17 13:46:58 2016 +0100
arm64: fix incorrect memory region size in TCR_EL2
The maximum and minimum values for TxSZ depend on level of
translation as per AArch64 Virtual Memory System Architecture.
According to ARM specification DDI0487A_h (sec D4.2.2, page 1752),
the minimum TxSZ value is 16. If TxSZ is programmed to a value
smaller than 16 then it is IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED.
This patch sets T0SZ to (64-48)bits since XEN uses all 4 levels
to cover 48bit (256TB) virtual address instead of value zero.
Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
(qemu changes not included)
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL
2016-12-12 7:58 ` [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: " osstest service owner
@ 2016-12-12 11:47 ` Ian Jackson
2016-12-12 13:35 ` Andrew Cooper
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ian Jackson @ 2016-12-12 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Andrew Cooper
Rosstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL"):
> flight 103161 xen-4.5-testing real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103161/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102721
> test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102721
> test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102721
> test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102721
> test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102721
AIUI this is a known and accepted regression in Xen 4.5: some of the
strange things done by one of the XTF tests causes a guest crash
(after a security updates was applied), and XTF does not clean up
after itself particularly well.
Accordingly I have force pushed this:
> version targeted for testing:
> xen 27be856265352c259c597ff696766a1668cf7564
(I have not killed the in-progress flight so there will be one further
report looking a bit like this.)
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL
2016-12-12 11:47 ` Ian Jackson
@ 2016-12-12 13:35 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-12-13 18:29 ` Ian Jackson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cooper @ 2016-12-12 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Jackson, xen-devel
On 12/12/16 11:47, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Rosstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL"):
>> flight 103161 xen-4.5-testing real [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103161/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not be run:
>> test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102721
>> test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102721
>> test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102721
>> test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102721
>> test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102721
> AIUI this is a known and accepted regression in Xen 4.5: some of the
> strange things done by one of the XTF tests causes a guest crash
> (after a security updates was applied), and XTF does not clean up
> after itself particularly well.
No. These are not the issues we discussed. The acceptable regression
is the invlpg~shadow test case only.
These leak check failures are because the XSA-195 PoC is somehow causing
qemu to segfault. I cant explain why, because qemu should be involved
at all, and it is especially suspicious that it is only older branches
where this happens.
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL
2016-12-12 13:35 ` Andrew Cooper
@ 2016-12-13 18:29 ` Ian Jackson
2016-12-13 18:49 ` Ian Jackson
2016-12-15 15:14 ` [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ian Jackson @ 2016-12-13 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cooper; +Cc: xen-devel
Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL"):
> On 12/12/16 11:47, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > AIUI this is a known and accepted regression in Xen 4.5: some of the
> > strange things done by one of the XTF tests causes a guest crash
> > (after a security updates was applied), and XTF does not clean up
> > after itself particularly well.
>
> No. These are not the issues we discussed. The acceptable regression
> is the invlpg~shadow test case only.
Hrm.
> These leak check failures are because the XSA-195 PoC is somehow causing
> qemu to segfault. I cant explain why, because qemu should be involved
> at all, and it is especially suspicious that it is only older branches
> where this happens.
As we discussed yesterday, while this may be a real bug, I think it is
not really a _regression_ in the sense that the osstest baseline
version has the same bug.
I therefore propose to do a force push of 4.4 too.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL
2016-12-13 18:29 ` Ian Jackson
@ 2016-12-13 18:49 ` Ian Jackson
2016-12-13 20:03 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-12-15 15:14 ` [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ian Jackson @ 2016-12-13 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cooper, xen-devel, Stefano Stabellini
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL"):
> As we discussed yesterday, while this may be a real bug, I think it is
> not really a _regression_ in the sense that the osstest baseline
> version has the same bug.
>
> I therefore propose to do a force push of 4.4 too.
I dug the coredump and built binaries out of 103161 and
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007fd84de5a20d in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#1 0x00007fd8519900d4 in address_space_rw ()
#2 0x00007fd8519901bd in cpu_physical_memory_rw ()
#3 0x00007fd851a6df4b in rw_phys_req_item ()
#4 0x00007fd851a6df81 in read_phys_req_item ()
#5 0x00007fd851a6e1dc in cpu_ioreq_move ()
#6 0x00007fd851a6e3b6 in handle_ioreq ()
#7 0x00007fd851a6e6d9 in cpu_handle_ioreq ()
#8 0x00007fd8518e13fc in qemu_iohandler_poll ()
#9 0x00007fd8518e238a in main_loop_wait ()
#10 0x00007fd851973aa1 in main_loop ()
#11 0x00007fd85197b049 in main ()
(gdb)
And the kernel said:
qemu-system-i38[3905]: segfault at 0 ip 00007fd84de5a20d sp
00007ffc38857878 error 4 in libc-2.19.so[7fd84ddc8000+1a1000]
The top ?? is probably because my gdb didn't find the corresponding
correct libc.so. Looking at the source for address_space_rw I wonder
if it is trying to use one of the `memcpy' calls on the
`memory_access_is_direct' branches, which would be a serious mistake.
Sadly there is no debug information. qemu seems to have crashed
without producing any output of any knd.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL
2016-12-13 18:49 ` Ian Jackson
@ 2016-12-13 20:03 ` Andrew Cooper
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cooper @ 2016-12-13 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Jackson, xen-devel, Stefano Stabellini
On 13/12/16 18:49, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL"):
>> As we discussed yesterday, while this may be a real bug, I think it is
>> not really a _regression_ in the sense that the osstest baseline
>> version has the same bug.
>>
>> I therefore propose to do a force push of 4.4 too.
> I dug the coredump and built binaries out of 103161 and
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x00007fd84de5a20d in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
> #1 0x00007fd8519900d4 in address_space_rw ()
> #2 0x00007fd8519901bd in cpu_physical_memory_rw ()
> #3 0x00007fd851a6df4b in rw_phys_req_item ()
> #4 0x00007fd851a6df81 in read_phys_req_item ()
> #5 0x00007fd851a6e1dc in cpu_ioreq_move ()
> #6 0x00007fd851a6e3b6 in handle_ioreq ()
> #7 0x00007fd851a6e6d9 in cpu_handle_ioreq ()
> #8 0x00007fd8518e13fc in qemu_iohandler_poll ()
> #9 0x00007fd8518e238a in main_loop_wait ()
> #10 0x00007fd851973aa1 in main_loop ()
> #11 0x00007fd85197b049 in main ()
> (gdb)
>
> And the kernel said:
>
> qemu-system-i38[3905]: segfault at 0 ip 00007fd84de5a20d sp
> 00007ffc38857878 error 4 in libc-2.19.so[7fd84ddc8000+1a1000]
>
> The top ?? is probably because my gdb didn't find the corresponding
> correct libc.so. Looking at the source for address_space_rw I wonder
> if it is trying to use one of the `memcpy' calls on the
> `memory_access_is_direct' branches, which would be a serious mistake.
>
> Sadly there is no debug information. qemu seems to have crashed
> without producing any output of any knd.
The XSA-195 PoC is very short.
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xtf.git;a=blob;f=tests/xsa-195/main.c;h=5cc2c18d82ab8d350cd07784d82680d4d0c7e72b;hb=HEAD
It constructs itself a memory hole with decrease_reservation of gfn 0,
then points a specially-crafted `bt` instruction to see whether Xen
crashes during emulation.
With Xen fixed, the emulation code in the hypervisor will come to the
conclusion that this is MMIO which should be sent to qemu. Xen will
therefore ask Qemu what value should be found at guest physical address
0xff8. I wonder if the fact that this is gfn 0 is causing Qemu to do
something wrong...
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [xen-4.4-testing test] 103240: regressions - FAIL
@ 2016-12-14 4:47 osstest service owner
2016-12-12 7:58 ` [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: " osstest service owner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: osstest service owner @ 2016-12-14 4:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel, osstest-admin
flight 103240 xen-4.4-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103240/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 20 xtf/test-hvm32-invlpg~shadow fail REGR. vs. 102521
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102521
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 31 xtf/test-hvm32pae-invlpg~shadow fail REGR. vs. 102521
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102521
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 42 xtf/test-hvm64-invlpg~shadow fail REGR. vs. 102521
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102521
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102521
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102521
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 15 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 102521
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 6 xen-boot fail in 103166 pass in 103240
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 15 guest-start/debian.repeat fail in 103166 pass in 103240
test-amd64-i386-xl-raw 18 guest-start/debian.repeat fail in 103166 pass in 103240
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 13 guest-localmigrate fail in 103166 pass in 103240
test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 9 windows-install fail in 103166 pass in 103240
test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 15 guest-start/debian.repeat fail pass in 103166
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop fail in 103166 like 102521
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 16 xtf/test-pv32pae-selftest fail like 102521
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 16 xtf/test-pv32pae-selftest fail like 102521
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop fail like 102521
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop fail like 102521
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop fail like 102521
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-rumprun-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-rumprun-i386 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 10 xtf-fep fail never pass
build-amd64-rumprun 7 xen-build fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 16 xtf/test-pv32pae-selftest fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 18 xtf/test-hvm32-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 10 xtf-fep fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 29 xtf/test-hvm32pae-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 18 xtf/test-hvm32-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 35 xtf/test-hvm32pse-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
build-i386-rumprun 7 xen-build fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 29 xtf/test-hvm32pae-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 10 xtf-fep fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 39 xtf/test-hvm64-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 35 xtf/test-hvm32pse-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 39 xtf/test-hvm64-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 9 debian-di-install fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 10 xtf-fep fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 11 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 51 xtf/test-hvm64-xsa-195 fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 9 debian-di-install fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 51 xtf/test-hvm64-xsa-195 fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel 16 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2 fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 51 xtf/test-hvm64-xsa-195 fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 10 xtf-fep fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 16 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2 fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 18 xtf/test-hvm32-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 29 xtf/test-hvm32pae-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 35 xtf/test-hvm32pse-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 39 xtf/test-hvm64-cpuid-faulting fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-libvirt 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 51 xtf/test-hvm64-xsa-195 fail never pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 51 xtf/test-hvm64-xsa-195 fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 9 debian-di-install fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 20 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 11 guest-start fail never pass
version targeted for testing:
xen 149c34a6ea0c6821620554059e85cb89acf0ff8f
baseline version:
xen 6639a202f285ace4adf57453ade066bd4b4298e0
Last test of basis 102521 2016-11-22 13:45:20 Z 21 days
Failing since 102718 2016-11-29 19:17:21 Z 14 days 13 attempts
Testing same since 103058 2016-12-08 01:54:44 Z 6 days 4 attempts
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
jobs:
build-amd64-xend pass
build-i386-xend pass
build-amd64-xtf pass
build-amd64 pass
build-armhf pass
build-i386 pass
build-amd64-libvirt pass
build-armhf-libvirt pass
build-i386-libvirt pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-armhf-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
build-amd64-rumprun fail
build-i386-rumprun fail
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 fail
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 fail
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 fail
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 fail
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-xl pass
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd fail
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd pass
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 pass
test-amd64-amd64-rumprun-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck pass
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 pass
test-amd64-i386-rumprun-i386 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel pass
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt fail
test-amd64-i386-libvirt pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-multivcpu pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu fail
test-amd64-amd64-pair pass
test-amd64-i386-pair pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair pass
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair pass
test-amd64-amd64-pv pass
test-amd64-i386-pv pass
test-amd64-amd64-amd64-pvgrub pass
test-amd64-amd64-i386-pvgrub pass
test-amd64-amd64-pygrub pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qcow2 pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-raw pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd fail
test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 pass
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org
logs: /home/logs/logs
images: /home/logs/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs
Explanation of these reports, and of osstest in general, is at
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README.email;hb=master
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=master
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Not pushing.
------------------------------------------------------------
commit 149c34a6ea0c6821620554059e85cb89acf0ff8f
Author: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Date: Wed Dec 7 16:54:47 2016 +0000
QEMU_TAG update
commit 1c1bfc1cf252f76b69664a7a6446d205da28f382
Author: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Date: Tue Nov 29 18:40:26 2016 +0000
QEMU_TAG update
========================================
commit eb200a6a9aca6ea6c03bea986d4b64c090672ed1
Author: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Date: Mon Nov 14 17:19:46 2016 +0000
qemu: ioport_read, ioport_write: be defensive about 32-bit addresses
On x86, ioport addresses are 16-bit. That these functions take 32-bit
arguments is a mistake. Changing the argument type to 16-bit will
discard the top bits of any erroneous values from elsewhere in qemu.
Also, check just before use that the value is in range. (This turns
an ill-advised change to MAX_IOPORTS into a possible guest crash
rather than a privilege escalation vulnerability.)
And, in the Xen ioreq processor, clamp incoming ioport addresses to
16-bit values. Xen will never write >16-bit values but the guest may
have access to the ioreq ring. We want to defend the rest of the qemu
code from wrong values.
This is XSA-199.
Reported-by: yanghongke <yanghongke@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
(cherry picked from commit b669e922b37b8957248798a5eb7aa96a666cd3fe)
(cherry picked from commit 095261a9ad5c31b9ed431f8382e8aa223089c85b)
(cherry picked from commit 18858e28bb6bae83ddcf413995b2e68c4c7ae03d)
(cherry picked from commit a7fd3717d99944530b04130f050e83402e64afed)
(cherry picked from commit 3af411fbe776a5436f695e70c9420ea736d03ca8)
commit 851b5ee8ae2a841373d605ae6f755cb33a3626f9
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Date: Tue Nov 29 18:38:24 2016 +0000
xen: fix ioreq handling
Avoid double fetches and bounds check size to avoid overflowing
internal variables.
This is XSA-197.
Reported-by: yanghongke <yanghongke@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
(cherry picked from commit fadd27b1a7d6f5cfc4786ef09d60b368e44226ad)
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages]
2016-12-13 18:29 ` Ian Jackson
2016-12-13 18:49 ` Ian Jackson
@ 2016-12-15 15:14 ` Ian Jackson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ian Jackson @ 2016-12-15 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cooper, xen-devel
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL"):
> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL"):
> > These leak check failures are because the XSA-195 PoC is somehow causing
> > qemu to segfault. I cant explain why, because qemu should be involved
> > at all, and it is especially suspicious that it is only older branches
> > where this happens.
>
> As we discussed yesterday, while this may be a real bug, I think it is
> not really a _regression_ in the sense that the osstest baseline
> version has the same bug.
>
> I therefore propose to do a force push of 4.4 too.
I have now done this. I force pushed this version:
osstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.4-testing test] 103240: regressions - FAIL"):
> flight 103240 xen-4.4-testing real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103240/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 20 xtf/test-hvm32-invlpg~shadow fail REGR. vs. 102521
> test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 42 xtf/test-hvm64-invlpg~shadow fail REGR. vs. 102521
> test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 31 xtf/test-hvm32pae-invlpg~shadow fail REGR. vs. 102521
These are expected.
> test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102521
> test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102521
> test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102521
> test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102521
> test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 52 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 102521
This is the known qemu crash, see above.
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 15 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 102521
This test seems to be slightly unreliable. It would be nice to know
why but in any case it's not a regression on the Xen 4.4 branch.
> version targeted for testing:
> xen 149c34a6ea0c6821620554059e85cb89acf0ff8f
So pushed this.
Later flights have more failures in, which is why I picked this one.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-12-15 15:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-12-14 4:47 [xen-4.4-testing test] 103240: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2016-12-12 7:58 ` [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: " osstest service owner
2016-12-12 11:47 ` Ian Jackson
2016-12-12 13:35 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-12-13 18:29 ` Ian Jackson
2016-12-13 18:49 ` Ian Jackson
2016-12-13 20:03 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-12-15 15:14 ` [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).