[xen-unstable-smoke test] 113052: trouble: broken/pass

[xen-unstable-smoke test] 113052: trouble: broken/pass

[osstest service owner]

flight 113052 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113052/

Failures and problems with tests :-(

Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
 build-arm64                     <job status>                 broken
 test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm         <job status>                 broken
 build-arm64-pvops               <job status>                 broken

Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
 test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm       1 build-check(1)               blocked  n/a
 build-arm64-pvops             2 hosts-allocate              broken like 113039
 build-arm64-pvops             3 capture-logs                broken like 113039
 build-arm64                   2 hosts-allocate              broken like 113039
 build-arm64                   3 capture-logs                broken like 113039
 test-armhf-armhf-xl          13 migrate-support-check        fail   never pass
 test-armhf-armhf-xl          14 saverestore-support-check    fail   never pass
 test-amd64-amd64-libvirt     13 migrate-support-check        fail   never pass

version targeted for testing:
 xen                  4d3f0fde471e7588ce512eaff1abdab209d8cd4b
baseline version:
 xen                  6dfb43d6f2cd8ea6274d203ca00ecfc7c565f11a

Last test of basis   113039  2017-09-04 15:02:08 Z    1 days
Testing same since   113052  2017-09-05 13:01:29 Z    0 days    1 attempts

------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
  Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

jobs:
 build-amd64                                                  pass    
 build-arm64                                                  broken  
 build-armhf                                                  pass    
 build-amd64-libvirt                                          pass    
 build-arm64-pvops                                            broken  
 test-armhf-armhf-xl                                          pass    
 test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm                                      broken  
 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386                     pass    
 test-amd64-amd64-libvirt                                     pass    


------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org
logs: /home/logs/logs
images: /home/logs/images

Logs, config files, etc. are available at
    http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs

Explanation of these reports, and of osstest in general, is at
    http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README.email;hb=master
    http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=master

Test harness code can be found at
    http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary

broken-job build-arm64 broken
broken-job test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm broken
broken-job build-arm64-pvops broken
broken-step build-arm64-pvops hosts-allocate
broken-step build-arm64-pvops capture-logs
broken-step build-arm64 hosts-allocate
broken-step build-arm64 capture-logs

Not pushing.

------------------------------------------------------------
commit 4d3f0fde471e7588ce512eaff1abdab209d8cd4b
Author: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Date:   Tue Sep 5 09:40:58 2017 +0100

    x86/emul: Fix the handling of unimplemented Grp7 instructions
    
    Grp7 is abnormally complicated to decode, even by x86's standards, with
    {s,l}msw being the problematic cases.
    
    Previously, any value which fell through the first switch statement (looking
    for instructions with entirely implicit operands) would be interpreted by the
    second switch statement (handling instructions with memory operands).
    
    Unimplemented instructions would then hit the #UD case for having a non-memory
    operand, rather than taking the cannot_emulate path.
    
    Consolidate the two switch statements into a single one, using ranges to cover
    the instructions with memory operands.
    
    Reported-by: Petre Pircalabu <ppircalabu@bitdefender.com>
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
    Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
(qemu changes not included)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel