From: Platform Team regression test user <citrix-osstest@xenproject.org>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, osstest-admin@xenproject.org
Subject: [ovmf baseline-only test] 66958: all pass
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 22:04:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <osstest-66958-mainreport@xen.org> (raw)
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 66958 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/66958/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 1fbd0ca16a997b68ed320340aef18645e71e8a73
baseline version:
ovmf 9e730bd16418d76e400f87cf852b53f960d1d5b3
Last test of basis 66948 2016-08-09 10:19:59 Z 1 days
Testing same since 66958 2016-08-10 03:19:59 Z 0 days 1 attempts
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
jobs:
build-amd64-xsm pass
build-i386-xsm pass
build-amd64 pass
build-i386 pass
build-amd64-libvirt pass
build-i386-libvirt pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 pass
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on osstest.xs.citrite.net
logs: /home/osstest/logs
images: /home/osstest/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Push not applicable.
------------------------------------------------------------
commit 1fbd0ca16a997b68ed320340aef18645e71e8a73
Author: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Date: Mon Aug 8 13:03:46 2016 +0200
StdLib/LibC ARM AARCH64: do not redefine compiler intrinsics
The memset() function is a compiler intrinsic on AARCH64 and ARM, and
so is memmove() on ARM. Usually, redefining them as LibC currently does
is not a problem since only one version will be selected at link time
from the various static libraries that provide implementations. However,
under LTO, this is slightly different, since explicit references (in the
C code) and implicit references (emitted by the compiler backend) may
resolve to different versions (LTO vs non-LTO), causing conflicts.
So simply omit them for ARM/AARCH64 resp. ARM.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
commit 78d706e23512435c8166afe88600c4de493e0e68
Author: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Date: Mon Aug 8 12:46:50 2016 +0200
StdLib/LibC: avoid LTO code for compiler intrinsics
The softfloat routines and some other routines supplied by LibC
will satisfy references to compiler intrinsics that are emitted
by the compiler backend, which under LTO means that the link-time
code generation may emit references to symbols that have been
optimized away already.
Work around this by building the ARM and AARCH64 versions of LibC
and the softfloat library without LTO.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Zimmermann <sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
commit 0f73cca02b645267cb11ab8ddf1ba88af5ec3246
Author: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Date: Mon Aug 8 12:33:06 2016 +0200
BaseTools ARM: impose strict alignment only for XIP modules
Given that we only support ARMv7 and up in Tianocore (due to the fact
that the PI spec mandates that the PEI services table pointer be stored
in the TPIDRURW register, which is not available on earlier CPUs), we can
assume that any code executing with the MMU on may perform unaligned
accesses (since the AArch32 bindings in the UEFI spec stipulate that
unaligned accesses should be allowed if supported by the CPU)
So relax the alignment restrictions to XIP modules only, i.e., BASE, SEC,
PEI_CORE and PEIM type modules, exactly like we do for AARCH64 already.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
commit 3cdbd7528bd46584551de60f3c47e63963dda117
Author: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Date: Mon Aug 8 11:58:59 2016 +0200
BaseTools CLANG35: add missing XIP flags for AARCH64
When building for AARCH64, code that may execute with the MMU off should
not perform unaligned accesses, which is why we set -mstrict-align for
BASE, SEC, PEI_CORE and PEIM modules when building with GCCx. However,
this setting is missing from CLANG35 so set it there as well.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
reply other threads:[~2016-08-10 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=osstest-66958-mainreport@xen.org \
--to=citrix-osstest@xenproject.org \
--cc=osstest-admin@xenproject.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).