From: Platform Team regression test user <citrix-osstest@xenproject.org>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, osstest-admin@xenproject.org
Subject: [ovmf baseline-only test] 75219: trouble: blocked/broken
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 10:54:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <osstest-75219-mainreport@xen.org> (raw)
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 75219 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xensource.com/osstest/logs/75219/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-xsm <job status> broken
build-i386 <job status> broken
build-amd64-pvops <job status> broken
build-i386-xsm <job status> broken
build-amd64 <job status> broken
build-i386-pvops <job status> broken
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
build-amd64-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
build-i386-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
build-i386 4 host-install(4) broken baseline untested
build-i386-pvops 4 host-install(4) broken baseline untested
build-i386-xsm 4 host-install(4) broken baseline untested
build-amd64-xsm 4 host-install(4) broken baseline untested
build-amd64-pvops 4 host-install(4) broken baseline untested
build-amd64 4 host-install(4) broken baseline untested
version targeted for testing:
ovmf f316a26013f2a8cfb1041d9f74a5c6d5bb9df9c9
baseline version:
ovmf 52664c525223a36e5cb9b141b11dec413908b1dd
Last test of basis 75215 2018-09-13 15:19:33 Z 0 days
Testing same since 75219 2018-09-14 05:20:10 Z 0 days 1 attempts
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
jobs:
build-amd64-xsm broken
build-i386-xsm broken
build-amd64 broken
build-i386 broken
build-amd64-libvirt blocked
build-i386-libvirt blocked
build-amd64-pvops broken
build-i386-pvops broken
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 blocked
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on osstest.xs.citrite.net
logs: /home/osstest/logs
images: /home/osstest/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://osstest.xensource.com/osstest/logs
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
broken-job build-amd64-xsm broken
broken-job build-i386 broken
broken-job build-amd64-pvops broken
broken-job build-i386-xsm broken
broken-job build-amd64 broken
broken-job build-i386-pvops broken
broken-step build-i386 host-install(4)
broken-step build-i386-pvops host-install(4)
broken-step build-i386-xsm host-install(4)
broken-step build-amd64-xsm host-install(4)
broken-step build-amd64-pvops host-install(4)
broken-step build-amd64 host-install(4)
Push not applicable.
------------------------------------------------------------
commit f316a26013f2a8cfb1041d9f74a5c6d5bb9df9c9
Author: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Date: Sun Sep 9 22:34:57 2018 +0800
MdeModulePkg: Avoid key notification called more than once
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=996
Issue:
In current code logic, when a key is pressed, it will search
the whole NotifyList to find whether a notification has been
registered with the keystroke. if yes, it will en-queue the
key for notification execution later. And now if different
notification functions have been registered with the same key,
then the key will be en-queued more than once. Then it will
cause the notification executed more than once.
This patch is to enhance the code logic to fix this issue.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
commit f92b8ee3b7a621d0db8708ec05ee13639436b4a9
Author: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Date: Sun Sep 9 22:29:56 2018 +0800
IntelFrameworkModulePkg: Avoid key notification called more than once
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=996
Issue:
In current code logic, when a key is pressed, it will search
the whole NotifyList to find whether a notification has been
registered with the keystroke. if yes, it will en-queue the
key for notification execution later. And now if different
notification functions have been registered with the same key,
then the key will be en-queued more than once. Then it will
cause the notification executed more than once.
This patch is to enhance the code logic to fix this issue.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
commit 9c8e9e76bd06014e430ecfa6c8f8e21374005a29
Author: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Date: Sun Sep 9 22:26:07 2018 +0800
EmbeddedPkg/VirtualKeyboard: Avoid notification called more than once
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=996
Issue:
In current code logic, when a key is pressed, it will search
the whole NotifyList to find whether a notification has been
registered with the keystroke. if yes, it will en-queue the
key for notification execution later. And now if different
notification functions have been registered with the same key,
then the key will be en-queued more than once. Then it will
cause the notification executed more than once.
This patch is to enhance the code logic to fix this issue.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
reply other threads:[~2018-09-14 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=osstest-75219-mainreport@xen.org \
--to=citrix-osstest@xenproject.org \
--cc=osstest-admin@xenproject.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).