From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com,
stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com
Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Subject: [PATCH 0 of 3] Patches for PCI passthrough with modified E820 (v3) - resent.
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 10:17:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <patchbomb.1304518670@localhost6.localdomain6> (raw)
Hello,
This set of v3 patches allows a PV domain to see the machine's
E820 and figure out where the "PCI I/O" gap is and match it with the reality.
Changelog since v2 posting:
- Moved 'libxl__e820_alloc' to be called from do_domain_create and if
machine_e820 == true.
- Made no_machine_e820 be set to true, if the guest has no PCI devices (and is PV)
- Used Keir's re-worked code for E820 creation.
Changelog since v1 posting:
- Squashed the "x86: make the pv-only e820 array be dynamic" and
"x86: adjust the size of the e820 for pv guest to be dynamic" together.
- Made xc_domain_set_memmap_limit use the 'xc_domain_set_memory_map'
- Moved 'libxl_e820_alloc' and 'libxl_e820_sanitize' to be an internal
operation and called from 'libxl_device_pci_parse_bdf'.
- Expanded 'libxl_device_pci_parse_bdf' API call to have an extra argument
(optional).
The short end is that with these patches a PV domain can:
- Use the correct PCI I/O gap. Before these patches, Linux guest would
boot up and would tell:
[ 0.000000] Allocating PCI resources starting at 40000000 (gap: 40000000:c0000000)
while in actuality the PCI I/O gap should have been:
[ 0.000000] Allocating PCI resources starting at b0000000 (gap: b0000000:4c000000)
- The PV domain with PCI devices was limited to 3GB. It now can be booted
with 4GB, 8GB, or whatever number you want. The PCI devices will now _not_ conflict
with System RAM. Meaning the drivers can load.
- With 2.6.39 kernels (which has the 1-1 mapping code), the VM_IO flag will be
now automatically applied to regions that are considerd PCI I/O regions. You can
find out which those are by looking for '1-1' in the kernel bootup.
To use this patchset, the guest config file has to have the parameter 'pci=['<BDF>',...]'
enabled.
This has been tested with 2.6.18 (RHEL5), 2.6.27(SLES11), 2.6.36, 2.6.37, 2.6.38,
and 2.6.39 kernels. Also tested with PV NetBSD 5.1.
Tested this with the PCI devices (NIC, MSI), and with 2GB, 4GB, and 6GB guests
with success.
libxc/xc_domain.c | 77 +++++++++++-----
libxc/xc_e820.h | 3
libxc/xenctrl.h | 11 ++
libxl/libxl.idl | 1
libxl/libxl_create.c | 8 +
libxl/libxl_internal.h | 1
libxl/libxl_pci.c | 230 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c | 3
8 files changed, 309 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2011-05-04 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-04 14:17 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-05-04 14:17 ` [PATCH 1 of 3] tools: Add xc_domain_set_memory_map and xc_get_machine_memory_map calls (x86, amd64 only) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-04 14:17 ` [PATCH 2 of 3] libxl: Add support for passing in the machine's E820 for PCI passthrough Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-10 8:29 ` Ian Campbell
2011-05-10 14:56 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-17 15:10 ` Ian Jackson
2011-05-17 16:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-17 16:05 ` Ian Campbell
2011-05-04 14:17 ` [PATCH 3 of 3] libxl: Convert E820_UNUSABLE and E820_RAM to E820_UNUSABLE as appropriate Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-09 9:00 ` [PATCH 0 of 3] Patches for PCI passthrough with modified E820 (v3) - resent Ian Campbell
2011-05-09 21:01 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-10 8:30 ` Ian Campbell
2011-05-10 14:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-10 15:09 ` Ian Campbell
2011-05-10 15:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-10 15:32 ` Ian Campbell
2011-05-10 15:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-11 7:49 ` Ian Campbell
2011-05-12 17:41 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-13 8:47 ` Ian Campbell
2011-05-13 13:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-17 16:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-17 16:07 ` Ian Campbell
2011-05-17 16:34 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=patchbomb.1304518670@localhost6.localdomain6 \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).