From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH 00 of 20] libxl: drop device_model_info
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:45:23 +0000
Message-ID: <patchbomb.1327337123@cosworth.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: ian.jackson@citrix.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

This is the first portion of my previous "libxl: drop
device_model_info, better defaults support, stubdoms by default"
series. Specifically it is the "drop device_model_info" bit (plus some
incidental bits & bobs).

I've split it to make it all a bit more manageable and to allow it to
be reviewed while I address some other concerns with the latter bits
of the other series.

This comes after "libxl: tweak the cpupool interface slightly" which I
sent this morning in my queue but I think the only relation is a tiny
bit of overlap of the context in patch #2. It also comes after "libxl:
remove _libxl_json_internal.h from libxl_json.h" but I beleive there
is no overlap there.

Ian.