From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0 of 2 v3] Sanity checking of scheduling parameters
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 11:08:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <patchbomb.1339146487@Solace> (raw)
Hi,
This small series achieves two goals:
- check the return value of libxl_domain_sched_params_set() in
libxl__build_post() and deal with the error, if that is the
case (patch #1);
- check and ensue we are passing along a meaningful set of sedf
scheduling parameters when they come directly from the config file
(patch #2)
Tested on both credit and sedf schedulers.
Changes from v2:
* actually propagate the error correctly instead of always returning
INVAL (in patch #1).
Changes from v1:
* patch #1: it was not there at all in v1! :-P
* patch #2: the if-s have been moved into an helper function. Also,
they only happen if the domain is actually being scheduled with
sedf (IanC, yes, I decided to do it... At the end of the day, it is
simple enough I think).
Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
next reply other threads:[~2012-06-08 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-08 9:08 Dario Faggioli [this message]
2012-06-08 9:08 ` [PATCH 1 of 2 v3] libxl: propagete down the error from libxl_domain_sched_params_set Dario Faggioli
2012-06-08 11:10 ` Ian Jackson
2012-06-08 9:08 ` [PATCH 2 of 2 v3] xl: check for meaningful combination of sedf config file parameters Dario Faggioli
2012-06-08 11:10 ` Ian Jackson
2012-06-08 11:11 ` George Dunlap
2012-06-08 14:26 ` Ian Jackson
2012-06-12 14:58 ` Ian Campbell
2012-06-14 15:06 ` [PATCH 2 of 2 v3] xl: check for meaningful combination of sedf config file parameters [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
2012-06-14 15:13 ` Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=patchbomb.1339146487@Solace \
--to=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).