xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>,
	Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0 of 2 v3] Sanity checking of scheduling parameters
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 11:08:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <patchbomb.1339146487@Solace> (raw)

Hi,

This small series achieves two goals:
 - check the return value of libxl_domain_sched_params_set() in
   libxl__build_post() and deal with the error, if that is the
   case (patch #1);
 - check and ensue we are passing along a meaningful set of sedf
   scheduling parameters when they come directly from the config file
   (patch #2)

Tested on both credit and sedf schedulers.

Changes from v2:
 * actually propagate the error correctly instead of always returning
   INVAL (in patch #1).

Changes from v1:
 * patch #1: it was not there at all in v1! :-P
 * patch #2: the if-s have been moved into an helper function. Also,
   they only happen if the domain is actually being scheduled with
   sedf (IanC, yes, I decided to do it... At the end of the day, it is
   simple enough I think).


Thanks and Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

             reply	other threads:[~2012-06-08  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-08  9:08 Dario Faggioli [this message]
2012-06-08  9:08 ` [PATCH 1 of 2 v3] libxl: propagete down the error from libxl_domain_sched_params_set Dario Faggioli
2012-06-08 11:10   ` Ian Jackson
2012-06-08  9:08 ` [PATCH 2 of 2 v3] xl: check for meaningful combination of sedf config file parameters Dario Faggioli
2012-06-08 11:10   ` Ian Jackson
2012-06-08 11:11     ` George Dunlap
2012-06-08 14:26       ` Ian Jackson
2012-06-12 14:58         ` Ian Campbell
2012-06-14 15:06           ` [PATCH 2 of 2 v3] xl: check for meaningful combination of sedf config file parameters [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
2012-06-14 15:13             ` Dario Faggioli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=patchbomb.1339146487@Solace \
    --to=raistlin@linux.it \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).