From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: dario.faggioli@citrix.com, keir@xen.org, jbeulich@suse.com
Subject: [PATCH 0 of 2] x86/numa logical fixes
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:49:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <patchbomb.1342010994@andrewcoop.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
These patches attempt to correct some of the Xen NUMA logic with respect to NUMA
nodes without attached memory. They are a followup to my earlier RFC patche on
27/06/2012
Given the nature of the issue, I would recomend that they be considered for 4.2
next reply other threads:[~2012-07-11 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-11 12:49 Andrew Cooper [this message]
2012-07-11 12:49 ` [PATCH 1 of 2] x86/numa: Correct assumption that each NUMA node has memory Andrew Cooper
2012-07-11 12:49 ` [PATCH 2 of 2] x86/numa: Remove warning about small NUMA nodes Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=patchbomb.1342010994@andrewcoop.uk.xensource.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).