From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0 of 3 v2] Some small NUMA placement improvements
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:34:53 +0200
Message-ID: <patchbomb.1350657293@Solace>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Hi again,

Take 2 of this series, with the only comment about strstr()-vs-strncmp() in
patch 2 addressed, and all the three patches already Acked-by George.

Just as a quick reminder, the series is about:
 - use node distances information during automatic placement (patch 1);
 - let the user specify a minimum and a maximum number of NUMA nodes they want
   the automaic placement to use (patch 2);
 - enhance the syntax of the "cpus=" config switch so that full nodes can be
   specified instead of just single CPUs (patch 3).

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)