From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Xen-Devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: Marcus Granado <Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@recoil.org>,
George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 00 of 11 v4] NUMA aware credit scheduling
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 03:30:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <patchbomb.1363314642@hit-nxdomain.opendns.com> (raw)
Hello,
Round 4 of the NUMA aware scheduling series. Very few going on, actually, as
the comments to v3 where not a big deal... Nevertheless, I, as usual, really
appreciated them a lot, and I think I've addressed them all. The only notable
change is on patch 05/11, where I discovered a small but nasty bug (see the
specific changelog).
I couldn't rerun the full set of my usual benchmarks, but I really don't think
that to be necessary, as practically no functional change is being introduced,
wrt to v3. However, I did run a couple of them, randomly, just to be sure,
and the numbers actually do look almost identical to these ones:
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-02/msg00009.html
What I'm now missing is a couple of Ack-s from the relevant people. In fact,
almost all the patches carry more than one Ack, but there are a few of them
which are missing Ack-s from the actual maintainers of the code they touch.
In some more details, and with
'*'='properly Ack-ed',
'+'= 'Ack-ed but _not_ by the maintainer',
here it comes the series:
* 01/11 xen, libxc: rename xenctl_cpumap to xenctl_bitmap
* 02/11 xen, libxc: introduce xc_nodemap_t
* 03/11 xen: sched_credit: when picking, make sure we get an idle one, if any
+ 04/11 xen: sched_credit: let the scheduler know about node-affinity
* 05/11 xen: allow for explicitly specifying node-affinity
* 06/11 libxc: allow for explicitly specifying node-affinity
+ 07/11 libxl: allow for explicitly specifying node-affinity
+ 08/11 libxl: optimize the calculation of how many VCPUs can run on a candidate
+ 09/11 libxl: automatic placement deals with node-affinity
+ 10/11 xl: add node-affinity to the output of `xl list
* 11/11 docs: rearrange and update NUMA placement documentation
So, George, if, as you said, you're fine with it, could you explicitly
ack 04/11 ?
Also, IanC and IanJ, could you have a look and ack (if you feel like
so, of course) 07/11, 08/11, 09/11 and 10/11 ?
Thanks a lot and Regads,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
next reply other threads:[~2013-03-15 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-15 2:30 Dario Faggioli [this message]
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 01 of 11 v4] xen, libxc: rename xenctl_cpumap to xenctl_bitmap Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 02 of 11 v4] xen, libxc: introduce xc_nodemap_t Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 03 of 11 v4] xen: sched_credit: when picking, make sure we get an idle one, if any Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 8:14 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-15 10:37 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 10:55 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-18 14:02 ` George Dunlap
2013-03-18 14:23 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 04 of 11 v4] xen: sched_credit: let the scheduler know about node-affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-03-18 13:58 ` George Dunlap
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 05 of 11 v4] xen: allow for explicitly specifying node-affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 8:17 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-15 14:20 ` Daniel De Graaf
2013-03-16 7:11 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 06 of 11 v4] libxc: " Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 07 of 11 v4] libxl: " Dario Faggioli
2013-03-18 14:33 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-18 14:35 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 08 of 11 v4] libxl: optimize the calculation of how many VCPUs can run on a candidate Dario Faggioli
2013-03-18 14:34 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 09 of 11 v4] libxl: automatic placement deals with node-affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-03-18 14:36 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 10 of 11 v4] xl: add node-affinity to the output of `xl list` Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 3:03 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-03-18 14:06 ` George Dunlap
2013-03-18 14:21 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-03-18 14:13 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-18 14:22 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 11 of 11 v4] docs: rearrange and update NUMA placement documentation Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=patchbomb.1363314642@hit-nxdomain.opendns.com \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=anil@recoil.org \
--cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=msw@amazon.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).