From: Dulloor <dulloor@gmail.com>
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 5] Add credit2 scheduler (EXPERIMENTAL)
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:29:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <z2w940bcfd21004171329w5f9aec41v77a9390fa5d59a5d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BC72004.2030203@eu.citrix.com>
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:17 AM, George Dunlap
<george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> Dulloor wrote:
>>
>> As we talked before, I am interested in improving the mutiple-socket
>> scenario and adding the load balancing functionalilty, which could
>> provide an acceptable alternative to pinning vcpus to sockets (for my
>> NUMA work). I am going over your patch right now, but what are your
>> thoughts ?
>>
>
> That would be great -- my focus for the next several months will be setting
> up a testing infrastructure to automatically test performance of different
> workloads mixes so I can hone the algorithm and test regressions.
>
> My idea with load balancing was to do this:
> * One runqueue per L2 cache.
> * Add code to calculate the load of a runqueue. Load would be the average
> (~integral) of (vcpus running + vcpus on runqueue). I was planning on doing
> accurate load calculation, rather than sample-based, and falling back to
> sample-based if accurate turned out to be too slow.
> * Calculate the load contributed by various vcpus.
> * At regular intervals, determine of some kind of balancing needs to be done
> by looking at the overall runqueue load and placing based on "contributory"
> load of each VCPU.
>
> Does that make sense? Thoughts?
Sounds good. I can see that the runq_map for all cpus point to the
same run-queue (in make_runq_map). I will start there.
>
> I have some old patches that calculated accurate load, I could dig them up
> if you wanted something to start with. (I don't think they'll apply cleanly
> at the moment.)
>
> Thanks,
> -George
>>
>> -dulloor
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:26 AM, George Dunlap
>> <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> This patch series introduces the credit2 scheduler. The first two
>>> patches
>>> introduce changes necessary to allow the credit2 shared runqueue
>>> functionality
>>> to work properly; the last two implement the functionality itself.
>>>
>>> The scheduler is still in the experimental phase. There's lots of
>>> opportunity to contribute with independent lines of development; email
>>> George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> or check out the wiki page
>>> http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Credit2_Scheduler_Development for ideas
>>> and status updates.
>>>
>>> 19 files changed, 1453 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>> tools/libxc/Makefile | 1
>>> tools/libxc/xc_csched2.c | 50 +
>>> tools/libxc/xenctrl.h | 8
>>> tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c | 58 +
>>> tools/python/xen/xend/XendAPI.py | 3
>>> tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomain.py | 54 +
>>> tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py | 4
>>> tools/python/xen/xend/XendNode.py | 4
>>> tools/python/xen/xend/XendVMMetrics.py | 1
>>> tools/python/xen/xend/server/SrvDomain.py | 14
>>> tools/python/xen/xm/main.py | 82 ++
>>> xen/arch/ia64/vmx/vmmu.c | 6
>>> xen/common/Makefile | 1
>>> xen/common/sched_credit.c | 8
>>> xen/common/sched_credit2.c | 1125
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> xen/common/schedule.c | 22
>>> xen/include/public/domctl.h | 4
>>> xen/include/public/trace.h | 1
>>> xen/include/xen/sched-if.h | 28
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>
>>>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-17 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-14 10:26 [PATCH 0 of 5] Add credit2 scheduler (EXPERIMENTAL) George Dunlap
2010-04-14 10:26 ` [PATCH 1 of 5] credit2: Add context_saved scheduler callback George Dunlap
2010-04-14 10:26 ` [PATCH 2 of 5] credit2: Flexible cpu-to-schedule-spinlock mappings George Dunlap
2010-04-14 10:26 ` [PATCH 3 of 5] credit2: Add a scheduler-specific schedule trace class George Dunlap
2010-04-14 10:26 ` [PATCH 4 of 5] credit2: Add credit2 scheduler to hypervisor George Dunlap
2010-04-14 10:26 ` [PATCH 5 of 5] credit2: Add toolstack options to control credit2 scheduler parameters George Dunlap
[not found] ` <7db7f696-1f0b-44d0-8f7b-eea1be5167dd@default>
2010-04-14 14:29 ` [PATCH 0 of 5] Add credit2 scheduler (EXPERIMENTAL) George Dunlap
2010-04-14 14:52 ` Keir Fraser
2010-04-14 15:59 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-04-14 16:23 ` Keir Fraser
2010-04-14 16:31 ` Dulloor
2010-04-14 16:36 ` Keir Fraser
2010-04-14 17:04 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-04-14 16:46 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-04-15 20:11 ` Dan Magenheimer
[not found] ` <4BC664E1.7090304@purdue.edu>
2010-04-15 13:53 ` George Dunlap
2010-04-15 16:46 ` Naresh Rapolu
2010-04-15 17:33 ` Dulloor
2010-04-15 18:57 ` Naresh Rapolu
[not found] ` <h2x940bcfd21004140841kcdffe330xff5d749d43392fe3@mail.gmail.com>
2010-04-15 14:17 ` George Dunlap
2010-04-17 20:29 ` Dulloor [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=z2w940bcfd21004171329w5f9aec41v77a9390fa5d59a5d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dulloor@gmail.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).