From: "Michael Opdenacker" <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
To: JPEWhacker@gmail.com, docs@lists.yoctoproject.org
Cc: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
Subject: [RFC 1/1] overview-manual: initial documentation for hash equivalence
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 21:55:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210617195530.258307-2-michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210617195530.258307-1-michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
---
documentation/overview-manual/concepts.rst | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
diff --git a/documentation/overview-manual/concepts.rst b/documentation/overview-manual/concepts.rst
index ab882ff778..bb8318ea46 100644
--- a/documentation/overview-manual/concepts.rst
+++ b/documentation/overview-manual/concepts.rst
@@ -1950,6 +1950,69 @@ another reason why a task-based approach is preferred over a
recipe-based approach, which would have to install the output from every
task.
+Hash Equivalence
+----------------
+
+The above section explained how BitBake skips the execution of tasks
+which output can already be found in the Shared State Cache.
+
+BitBake can go beyond this and also skip the execution of tasks that,
+even though the hash for their dependencies has changed, still generate
+identical output.
+
+So, even if two executions of a given task can have a different hash,
+because of potentially different sources, different environment variables
+or different output hashes for the tasks they depend on, they can be considered
+as "equivalent" as long as they generate the same output hash.
+
+Thanks to this equivalence, a change in one of the tasks in BitBake's run queue
+doesn't have to propagate to all the downstream tasks that depend on the output
+of this task, causing a full rebuild of such tasks, and so on with the next
+depending tasks. Instead, BitBake can safely retrieve all the downstream
+task output from the Shared State Cache.
+
+This applies to multiple scenarios:
+
+- A "trivial" change to a recipe that doesn't impact its generated output,
+ such as whitespace changes, modifications to unused code paths or
+ in the ordering of variables.
+
+- Shared library updates, for example to fix a security vulnerability.
+ For sure, the programs using such a library should be rebuilt, but
+ their new binaries should remain identical. The corresponding tasks should
+ have a different output hash because of the change in the hash of their
+ library dependency, but thanks to their output being identical, hash
+ equivalence will stop the propagation down the dependency chain.
+
+- Native tool updates. Though the depending tasks should be rebuilt,
+ it's likely that they will generate the same output and be marked
+ as equivalent.
+
+This mechanism is enabled by default in Poky, and is controlled by two
+variables:
+
+- :term:`bitbake:BB_HASHSERVE`, specifying a local or remote hash
+ equivalence server to use.
+
+- :term:`bitbake:BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER`, which must be set to ``OEEquivHash``.
+
+Therefore, the default configuration in Poky corresponds to the
+below settings::
+
+ BB_HASHSERVE = "auto"
+ BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER = "OEEquivHash"
+
+Another possibility is to share a hash equivalence server on a network,
+by setting::
+
+ BB_HASHSERVE = "<HOSTNAME>:<PORT>"
+
+.. note::
+
+ The hash equivalence server needs to be maintained together with the
+ share state cache. Otherwise, the server could report shared state hashes
+ that do not exist.
+
Automatically Added Runtime Dependencies
========================================
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-17 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-17 19:55 [RFC 0/1] initial documentation for hash equivalence Michael Opdenacker
2021-06-17 19:55 ` Michael Opdenacker [this message]
2021-06-17 20:40 ` [docs] [RFC 1/1] overview-manual: " Richard Purdie
2021-06-18 16:55 ` Michael Opdenacker
2021-06-17 20:47 ` [docs] [RFC 0/1] " Richard Purdie
2021-06-18 16:59 ` Michael Opdenacker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210617195530.258307-2-michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com \
--to=michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com \
--cc=JPEWhacker@gmail.com \
--cc=docs@lists.yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox