Re: [docs] [PATCH 13/16] ref-manual: merge patch-status-* to patch-status

[Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@rootcommit.com>]

Hi Antonin

On 10/9/24 09:41, Antonin Godard via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> From: Antonin Godard <antonin.godard@bootlin.com>
>
> These are not distinct anymore and check for any patches in any layer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antonin Godard <antonin.godard@bootlin.com>
> ---
>   documentation/ref-manual/classes.rst | 8 ++------
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/documentation/ref-manual/classes.rst b/documentation/ref-manual/classes.rst
> index 121887d1f..0fce37cfa 100644
> --- a/documentation/ref-manual/classes.rst
> +++ b/documentation/ref-manual/classes.rst
> @@ -1461,12 +1461,8 @@ The tests you can list with the :term:`WARN_QA` and
>   -  ``patch-fuzz:`` Checks for fuzz in patch files that may allow
>      them to apply incorrectly if the underlying code changes.
>   
> --  ``patch-status-core:`` Checks that the Upstream-Status is specified
> -   and valid in the headers of patches for recipes in the OE-Core layer.
> -
> --  ``patch-status-noncore:`` Checks that the Upstream-Status is specified
> -   and valid in the headers of patches for recipes in layers other than
> -   OE-Core.
> +-  ``patch-status:`` Checks that the Upstream-Status is specified and valid in
> +   the headers of patches for recipes.

Not your fault here, but an opportunity to write:

Checks that the ``Upstream-Status`` value is specified...
Cheers
Michael.

-- 
Michael Opdenacker
Root Commit
https://rootcommit.com