From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6495EEA3C5F for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 11:22:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout-03.galae.net (smtpout-03.galae.net [185.246.85.4]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.msgproc02-g2.129837.1775733759159473186 for ; Thu, 09 Apr 2026 04:22:40 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=fail reason="dkim: body hash did not verify" header.i=@bootlin.com header.s=dkim header.b=j3MLe8Ca; spf=pass (domain: bootlin.com, ip: 185.246.85.4, mailfrom: joaomarcos.costa@bootlin.com) Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-03.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10D1D4E4299F for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 11:22:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D66795FDEB; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 11:22:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id AD86F104502B2; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 13:22:35 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1775733756; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:references; bh=WX3wHZEby5HlWfJZM/hOC2YE+xuH2lnaPIRxDAEToN4=; b=j3MLe8CaarNotQ0q8ECA574NW5lCg17tBolwYHYffFvLnvfgqQcbGOeaXRZCoTimkN70OV mQH33+S8Opeu0DU5XF13IDgw0xdrVxRezQAzQoeneKdywFMbdcXIOCx9l/hCfsUnILXKJg oEa4RDOj8d83Hht4OwGNjpV3Ds6AJ+hrRi6RgHvJ+HZOTa7r+6QTgBa8MuTI0OS7ctBpvK ajsxI7PKFkJerPn4xqn0xyCgg88q6WTuMrCVrIzWTuUulYGw5BTBODXewqBX+Clm463xLu gcJdxb3NZxeHbSBacam5hgRbRw2Qz0gZS/LQGwnkChQahH05XToS55p9zJAmVQ== Message-ID: <7d76e296-5ec5-4dd2-8813-782b497a58a8@bootlin.com> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2026 13:22:35 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [docs] [PATCH] ref-manual/variables.rst: fix wording in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE note To: quentin.schulz@cherry.de, docs@lists.yoctoproject.org References: <20260409094035.346379-1-joaomarcos.costa@bootlin.com> <5ff51b37-613a-448d-949f-406a56f1a012@cherry.de> Content-Language: en-US, fr From: Joao Marcos Costa Organization: Bootlin In-Reply-To: <5ff51b37-613a-448d-949f-406a56f1a012@cherry.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from 45-33-107-173.ip.linodeusercontent.com [45.33.107.173] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:22:42 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/docs/message/9208 Hello, Quentin On 4/9/26 12:29, Quentin Schulz via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > Hi Jo=C3=A3o, >=20 > On 4/9/26 11:40 AM, Joao Marcos Costa via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: >> Add missing "that" between "recipe" and "inherits". >> >> Signed-off-by: Jo=C3=A3o Marcos Costa >> --- >> =C2=A0 documentation/ref-manual/variables.rst | 2 +- >> =C2=A0 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/documentation/ref-manual/variables.rst=20 >> b/documentation/ref-manual/variables.rst >> index 60e608c0c..8466124e0 100644 >> --- a/documentation/ref-manual/variables.rst >> +++ b/documentation/ref-manual/variables.rst >> @@ -1679,7 +1679,7 @@ system and gives an overview of their function=20 >> and contents. >> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 .. note:: >> -=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 When :term:`COMPATIB= LE_MACHINE` is set in a recipe inherits=20 >> from >> +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 When :term:`COMPATIB= LE_MACHINE` is set in a recipe that=20 >> inherits from >> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 native, t= he recipe is always skipped. All native recipes=20 >> must be >=20 > Doesn't read well to me still. I would say maybe go for >=20 > "in a native recipe" >=20 > What do you think? >=20 > Cheers, > Quentin I like the current phrasing, to be honest. My only concern about it is=20 the grammar, so my goal here is to provide a plain fix rather than a=20 subjective improvement in semantics. Thanks for the review! --=20 Best regards, Jo=C3=A3o Marcos Costa