public inbox for docs@lists.yoctoproject.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Antonin Godard" <antonin.godard@bootlin.com>
To: "Quentin Schulz" <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>,
	<docs@lists.yoctoproject.org>
Cc: "Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [docs] [yocto-docs PATCH] set_versions.py: use backward-compatible python argument in run
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 09:19:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D6EOH4KNGJ45.1ZSRSG06NDDWS@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3c0405f4-6059-411a-8854-727581e37484@cherry.de>

Hi Quentin,

On Tue Dec 17, 2024 at 12:05 PM CET, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> Hi Antonin,
>
> On 12/17/24 11:35 AM, Antonin Godard via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
>> Some workers on the autobuilder reported the following error:
>> 
>>    File "./set_versions.py", line 102, in <module>
>>      subprocess.run(["git", "show", "yocto-%s" % release_series[activereleases[0]]], capture_output=True, check=True)
>>    File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/subprocess.py", line 423, in run
>>      with Popen(*popenargs, **kwargs) as process:
>>    TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'capture_output'
>> 
>> See https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org/#/builders/34/builds/86.
>> 
>> This is because capture_output was introduced in Python 3.7, and some of
>> the support distributions are still on Python 3.6. Since capture_output
>> is essentially just setting stdout and stderr to PIPE
>> (https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/3.13/Lib/subprocess.py#L547), do
>> it manually here to be compatible with older python versions.
>> 
>> This is also the case for the "text" parameter, introduced in 3.7 to
>> alias the universal_newlines parameter. Use "universal_newlines" to be
>> backward-compatible.
>> 
>> [ YOCTO #15687 ]
>> 
>
> Do we really want to open that can of worms?
>
> https://docs.yoctoproject.org/ref-manual/system-requirements.html#required-git-tar-python-make-and-gcc-versions 
> clearly states the minimal supported Python version is 3.8.0 so maybe we 
> should just stop building the docs on those distros that are still on 
> old Python? I'm actually surprised building YP on AlmaLinux 8 works 
> then, is it because of uninative?

We still support 3.6 on Kirkstone. The docs build uses a buildtools tarball to
get a recent Sphinx version, rsvg-convert, etc. I wouldn't know how this is done
for other builds, though.

> Looks ok to me otherwise.

Thank you,
Antonin

-- 
Antonin Godard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com


  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-18  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-17 10:35 [yocto-docs PATCH] set_versions.py: use backward-compatible python argument in run Antonin Godard
2024-12-17 11:05 ` [docs] " Quentin Schulz
2024-12-18  8:19   ` Antonin Godard [this message]
2024-12-18 13:39     ` Quentin Schulz
2024-12-19  8:19       ` Antonin Godard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D6EOH4KNGJ45.1ZSRSG06NDDWS@bootlin.com \
    --to=antonin.godard@bootlin.com \
    --cc=docs@lists.yoctoproject.org \
    --cc=quentin.schulz@cherry.de \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox