Yocto Project Documentation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Antonin Godard" <antonin.godard@bootlin.com>
To: <dixitparmar19@gmail.com>, <docs@lists.yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: [docs] [PATCH v2] ref-manual: document KERNEL_SPLIT_MODULES variable
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 14:59:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DAPOERTPGVZQ.1S2ZZBVVMS1N6@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9960.1750248888618731264@lists.yoctoproject.org>

On Wed Jun 18, 2025 at 2:14 PM CEST, Dixit Parmar via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> Will fix the ref->term typo and the take your suggestion on rewording.
>
> There seem to be confusion related to the kernel package name, however I feel
> it was additional information. I shall remove the mention of the kernel
> package name (keep the variable reference only) for simplicity in next
> version.

Looking forward to it!

> Yes, you would be able to install "all" the kernel-modules without bothering
> about KERNEL_SPLIT_MODULES. The issue is having autoload .conf file being
> installed or not when KERNEL_MODULE_AUTOLOAD is having your modules listed to
> be autoloader. When KERNEL_SPLIT_MODULES = 0 the .conf files for driver
> autoload and probeconf is not getting generated.

This sounds like a bug to me, no? Why would someone expect setting
KERNEL_SPLIT_MODULES to 0 have the autoload files missing?

I ran a some tests. So when I set KERNEL_SPLIT_MODULES to 1, and
KERNEL_MODULE_AUTOLOAD to "xt_limit", a kernel-module-xt-limit.ipk package is
generated like so:

├── etc
│   └── modules-load.d
│       └── xt_limit.conf
└── lib
    └── modules
        └── 6.12.30-yocto-standard
            └── kernel
                └── net
                    └── netfilter
                        └── xt_limit.ko

When KERNEL_SPLIT_MODULES is set to 0, only one kernel-modules.ipk package is
generated, and does _not_ contain xt_limit.conf, but only xt_limit.ko. To me
this sounds like a bug, what do you think?

I would _not_ describe that behavior in the documentation for the
KERNEL_SPLIT_MODULES variables.

The fact that "kernel-modules" is still available when KERNEL_SPLIT_MODULES = 1
is simply because a "fake" kernel-modules.ipk package is generated, and depends
on the other kernel-module-* packages - so you can ignore my remark in my
previous message.

Thanks,
Antonin

-- 
Antonin Godard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com



  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-18 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-08 10:44 [PATCH v2] ref-manual: document KERNEL_SPLIT_MODULES variable Dixit Parmar
2025-06-10  8:55 ` [docs] " Antonin Godard
2025-06-10  9:20   ` Antonin Godard
2025-06-18 12:14     ` Dixit Parmar
2025-06-18 12:59       ` Antonin Godard [this message]
2025-06-18 13:19         ` Dixit Parmar
2025-06-18 13:42           ` [docs] " Antonin Godard
2025-06-21  6:48             ` Dixit Parmar
2025-07-01  8:37 ` Antonin Godard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DAPOERTPGVZQ.1S2ZZBVVMS1N6@bootlin.com \
    --to=antonin.godard@bootlin.com \
    --cc=dixitparmar19@gmail.com \
    --cc=docs@lists.yoctoproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox