From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DCB3C433F5 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 22:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qv1-f47.google.com (mail-qv1-f47.google.com [209.85.219.47]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.18278.1639434609926662838 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:30:10 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=hb5TSkTS; spf=pass (domain: gmail.com, ip: 209.85.219.47, mailfrom: twoerner@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qv1-f47.google.com with SMTP id gu12so15782044qvb.6 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:30:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=QGJgFA3FIcGeXnbuyiE0oRK5WZWrjMHMHsMebsQ5vbA=; b=hb5TSkTSKKXZ8pELOBqXwWAHCpTTWOEkjNpiQVRC7bAQdY8YGZJGrzQxCL22qWCjZG zaLu3fOF5V95aKHVtadxBPfAAkRjKV4bkPrBw2AZ5QtAsbg6oUUgwkCfRoxkHt25mpF5 YeWh/gul6Z+dAlslwf+1q5vVHNeaBKwX4zyaFy2ECfbetiNiKbYV2wsXefWwRRbYZm+u G1KsO/3jAe0XjStzBm3KSg+I7a48htK6TtUt6pO+ccQmtCLgFnIQDb9j+GQL6kG7qGJA ce77DwCTxClQcMU+gGiU9bzTeFgFnZuc62efvdLG+zCf8coKR/hS97bqv/ZuHopEHVok xQ7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=QGJgFA3FIcGeXnbuyiE0oRK5WZWrjMHMHsMebsQ5vbA=; b=Go/GAwg0QoKPBv65nZFMPhYQgbXGBsWYr2flxs4Rnm6aUsj9jKECdCxNjVPE482+zM KiJik4TT7Qw5Deh8twEVny4caFuPBU9RcRuZ8NQqveR5meG0wlimJzLEMvhVsP/nVsoU DK/saGr7UsVqZDgQAhtDjVWoUrVEwy0gBWhDTfqlJ0tPcc28dOD9md1aDcQahEkWFup+ jiv/XJSSsXkz1sf9XMta3+oJkht8jqCsiOqkQ7hWMlf9NGrCFtqVnUPvjMvfz0tNtJe9 pmuJC37XUlTm6WGUwLJd6t4SggdMzw+FZvchnsWCRxHg98uf9Ad2Vbe8VCAoMyS/5dgV t2rg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Vo47FRD1vzrtAdBWuEIDGl5nhZpyJlGW/0BVpS9MtIVi/X7gH OdjEt7hzTa5MBrEKTLhhgLM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyxTWeaNqLHLQQzpl4HA/pdq+pLoWj+c75KeWXWVzuPQDHN6PmQT9zeG/yow6LrzueMyTeIiw== X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5a13:: with SMTP id ei19mr1170571qvb.129.1639434609009; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:30:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (pppoe-209-91-167-254.vianet.ca. [209.91.167.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bq36sm6842808qkb.6.2021.12.13.14.30.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:30:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 17:30:05 -0500 From: Trevor Woerner To: Khem Raj Cc: Quentin Schulz , Yocto-mailing-list , Quentin Schulz Subject: Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] kernel: linux-yocto: fix broken Ethernet MAC controller on RK3399 on 5.14 >= version <= 5.14.11 Message-ID: <20211213223005.GA36849@localhost> References: <20211116170406.abau3j6liwsdonbp@fedora> <20211116171242.7dyycd3d2qwb4ske@fedora> <69C8168A-27F2-4B12-9592-264E80EFBC2D@0leil.net> <20211213090032.dy47s56sykoikbfc@fedora> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 22:30:11 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/55568 Hi Quentin/Khem, On Mon 2021-12-13 @ 09:35:53 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 9:18 AM Quentin Schulz wrote: > > > > Hi Khem, > > > > On December 13, 2021 4:04:03 PM GMT+01:00, Khem Raj wrote: > > >On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 1:00 AM Quentin Schulz < > > >quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Trevor, > > >> > > >> Gentle ping :) > > >> > > >> Honister 3.4.1 being out it's less of an issue but the question remains > > >> at least for settling on a policy :) I apologize for not reviewing this patch in a timely manner; I'm sorry for the frustration it caused. Would this have been solved by (me) creating a honister branch? I usually don't create a release branch until openembedded-core moves, but this looks like it was a case where master and the latest branch diverged? If so, would that still be useful? Best regards, Trevor