Yocto Project Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Harro Verton" <wanwizard@openpli.org>
To: "Joshua Watt" <JPEWhacker@gmail.com>, yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] Hashserve OEEquivHash unihash issue
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 09:40:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <307014.1789144839597694168@lists.yoctoproject.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJdd5GYmUEJjWnVCYC1y_g+_0gMFASHw4M+ZjHnGBOZHTKocVw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1675 bytes --]

Thanks for the quick reply, much appreciated !

> 
> What this usually means is that you have two recipes that have different
> task hashes, but produce the same output so the hashserver is mapping them
> together as expected. You might want to figure out why the taskhashes are
> different; if you have the .sigdata files for those hashes (look for e.g.
> "sigdata.8da90b016d0a41cac6ce46c20d8ee64d5e7af35687de43c306544508050227e8"
> in the stamps directory) you can diff them with bitbake-diffsigs and see
> what is actually different.

This file doesn't exist in the stamps directory, and neither does an entry for the hash it was changed to.

The (relevant?) build config contains:

INHERIT += "rm_work"
PRSERV_HOST = "localhost:0"
BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER = "OEEquivHash"
BB_HASHSERVE = "auto"

INSANE_SKIP += "version-going-backwards"
ERROR_QA:remove = "version-going-backwards"
BUILDHISTORY_CHECKVERBACKWARDS = "0"
INHERIT:remove = "buildhistory"

If I flash the image built on both devices, I see that on the first device, ffmpeg - 6.1.4-r0.0 is installed, and on the second, ffmpeg - 6.1.4-r0.1.  And as a result, the first machine shows in the "opkg list-upgradable" output "ffmpeg - 6.1.4-r0.0 - 6.1.4-r0.1". In deploy/ipks/cortexa15hf-neon-vfpv4 (same for both devices), I only have the ipk for 6.1.4-r0.1.

If I build both MACHINE's a second time, new rootfs files are generated, but to my surprise, for the first device the rootfs still contains ffmpeg - 6.1.4-r0.0, even though that does not exist anywhere in the build tree.

I have no clue where to start looking, but something changed along the way in Scarthgap that "broke" this.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1865 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-11 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-10 19:42 Hashserve OEEquivHash unihash issue Harro Verton
2026-09-10 19:50 ` [yocto] " Harro Verton
2026-09-10 19:58   ` Joshua Watt
2026-09-11 16:40     ` Harro Verton [this message]
2026-09-11 16:48       ` Harro Verton
2026-09-17 10:40         ` Harro Verton
2026-09-10 20:00 ` [yocto] " Joshua Watt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=307014.1789144839597694168@lists.yoctoproject.org \
    --to=wanwizard@openpli.org \
    --cc=JPEWhacker@gmail.com \
    --cc=yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox