From: syzbot <syzbot+0b9cadf5fc45a98a5083@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: chao@kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [syzbot] possible deadlock in f2fs_write_checkpoint
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 01:09:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0000000000004cede805d58728c3@google.com> (raw)
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 57c149e506d5 Add linux-next specific files for 20220110
git tree: linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=15cb8b77b00000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2f1cca5543ac6349
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=0b9cadf5fc45a98a5083
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+0b9cadf5fc45a98a5083@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.16.0-rc8-next-20220110-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
f2fs_ckpt-7:2/4139 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88807c598390 (&sem->internal_rwsem#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2149 [inline]
ffff88807c598390 (&sem->internal_rwsem#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x535/0x5d00 fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:1615
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88807c599338 (&sem->internal_rwsem#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2149 [inline]
ffff88807c599338 (&sem->internal_rwsem#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __write_checkpoint_sync fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:1744 [inline]
ffff88807c599338 (&sem->internal_rwsem#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __checkpoint_and_complete_reqs+0xdd/0x360 fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:1764
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&sem->internal_rwsem#2);
lock(&sem->internal_rwsem#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
1 lock held by f2fs_ckpt-7:2/4139:
#0: ffff88807c599338 (&sem->internal_rwsem#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2149 [inline]
#0: ffff88807c599338 (&sem->internal_rwsem#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __write_checkpoint_sync fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:1744 [inline]
#0: ffff88807c599338 (&sem->internal_rwsem#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __checkpoint_and_complete_reqs+0xdd/0x360 fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:1764
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 4139 Comm: f2fs_ckpt-7:2 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8-next-20220110-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
print_deadlock_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2956 [inline]
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2999 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3788 [inline]
__lock_acquire.cold+0x149/0x3ab kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5027
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5639 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5604
down_write+0x90/0x150 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1514
f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2149 [inline]
f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x535/0x5d00 fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:1615
__write_checkpoint_sync fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:1745 [inline]
__checkpoint_and_complete_reqs+0xea/0x360 fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:1764
issue_checkpoint_thread+0xdf/0x250 fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:1795
kthread+0x2e9/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:377
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: syzbot <syzbot+0b9cadf5fc45a98a5083@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: chao@kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] possible deadlock in f2fs_write_checkpoint
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 01:09:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0000000000004cede805d58728c3@google.com> (raw)
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 57c149e506d5 Add linux-next specific files for 20220110
git tree: linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=15cb8b77b00000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2f1cca5543ac6349
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=0b9cadf5fc45a98a5083
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+0b9cadf5fc45a98a5083@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.16.0-rc8-next-20220110-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
f2fs_ckpt-7:2/4139 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88807c598390 (&sem->internal_rwsem#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2149 [inline]
ffff88807c598390 (&sem->internal_rwsem#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x535/0x5d00 fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:1615
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88807c599338 (&sem->internal_rwsem#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2149 [inline]
ffff88807c599338 (&sem->internal_rwsem#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __write_checkpoint_sync fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:1744 [inline]
ffff88807c599338 (&sem->internal_rwsem#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __checkpoint_and_complete_reqs+0xdd/0x360 fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:1764
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&sem->internal_rwsem#2);
lock(&sem->internal_rwsem#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
1 lock held by f2fs_ckpt-7:2/4139:
#0: ffff88807c599338 (&sem->internal_rwsem#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2149 [inline]
#0: ffff88807c599338 (&sem->internal_rwsem#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __write_checkpoint_sync fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:1744 [inline]
#0: ffff88807c599338 (&sem->internal_rwsem#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __checkpoint_and_complete_reqs+0xdd/0x360 fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:1764
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 4139 Comm: f2fs_ckpt-7:2 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8-next-20220110-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
print_deadlock_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2956 [inline]
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2999 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3788 [inline]
__lock_acquire.cold+0x149/0x3ab kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5027
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5639 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5604
down_write+0x90/0x150 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1514
f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2149 [inline]
f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x535/0x5d00 fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:1615
__write_checkpoint_sync fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:1745 [inline]
__checkpoint_and_complete_reqs+0xea/0x360 fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:1764
issue_checkpoint_thread+0xdf/0x250 fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c:1795
kthread+0x2e9/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:377
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
next reply other threads:[~2022-01-14 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-14 9:09 syzbot [this message]
2022-01-14 9:09 ` [syzbot] possible deadlock in f2fs_write_checkpoint syzbot
2022-02-02 13:34 ` [f2fs-dev] " syzbot
2022-02-02 13:34 ` syzbot
2022-02-03 2:23 ` [f2fs-dev] " syzbot
2022-02-03 2:23 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0000000000004cede805d58728c3@google.com \
--to=syzbot+0b9cadf5fc45a98a5083@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.