All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+8fb64a61fdd96b50f3b8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [reiserfs?] possible deadlock in open_xa_dir
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 22:35:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0000000000007bedb605f119ed9f@google.com> (raw)

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    1b929c02afd3 Linux 6.2-rc1
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11da7f8c480000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2651619a26b4d687
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8fb64a61fdd96b50f3b8
compiler:       gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d562ace1a56c/disk-1b929c02.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/39f000fe6b9e/vmlinux-1b929c02.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/1c67e48de5a0/bzImage-1b929c02.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+8fb64a61fdd96b50f3b8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.2.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.1/19784 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88807d682090 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: reiserfs_write_lock+0x79/0x100 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27

but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880899d6ce0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:791 [inline]
ffff8880899d6ce0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: open_xa_root fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:127 [inline]
ffff8880899d6ce0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: open_xa_dir+0x127/0x830 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:152

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9/3){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       down_write_nested+0x98/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1672
       inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:791 [inline]
       open_xa_root fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:127 [inline]
       open_xa_dir+0x127/0x830 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:152
       reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x1ab/0x9a0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:252
       reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x20/0xa0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:364
       reiserfs_evict_inode+0x2e7/0x540 fs/reiserfs/inode.c:53
       evict+0x2ed/0x6b0 fs/inode.c:664
       iput_final fs/inode.c:1747 [inline]
       iput.part.0+0x59b/0x880 fs/inode.c:1773
       iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1763
       reiserfs_create+0x65a/0x730 fs/reiserfs/namei.c:688
       vfs_create fs/namei.c:3115 [inline]
       vfs_create+0x3ed/0x670 fs/namei.c:3101
       do_mknodat+0x3c4/0x510 fs/namei.c:3965
       __do_sys_mknod fs/namei.c:3998 [inline]
       __se_sys_mknod fs/namei.c:3996 [inline]
       __x64_sys_mknod+0x11e/0x180 fs/namei.c:3996
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #0 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x2a43/0x56d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x630 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5633
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x12f/0x1360 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
       reiserfs_write_lock+0x79/0x100 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27
       reiserfs_mkdir+0x31c/0x990 fs/reiserfs/namei.c:831
       xattr_mkdir fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:76 [inline]
       open_xa_root fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:136 [inline]
       open_xa_dir+0x6a3/0x830 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:152
       xattr_lookup+0x21/0x3d0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:395
       reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0xfb/0xb00 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:533
       reiserfs_xattr_set+0x454/0x5b0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:633
       trusted_set+0xa7/0xd0 fs/reiserfs/xattr_trusted.c:31
       __vfs_setxattr+0x173/0x1e0 fs/xattr.c:202
       __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x129/0x5f0 fs/xattr.c:236
       __vfs_setxattr_locked+0x1d3/0x260 fs/xattr.c:297
       vfs_setxattr+0x143/0x340 fs/xattr.c:323
       do_setxattr+0x151/0x190 fs/xattr.c:608
       setxattr+0x146/0x160 fs/xattr.c:631
       path_setxattr+0x197/0x1c0 fs/xattr.c:650
       __do_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:666 [inline]
       __se_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:662 [inline]
       __x64_sys_setxattr+0xc4/0x160 fs/xattr.c:662
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9/3);
                               lock(&sbi->lock);
                               lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9/3);
  lock(&sbi->lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by syz-executor.1/19784:
 #0: ffff88801c7fe460 (sb_writers#17){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: path_setxattr+0xb2/0x1c0 fs/xattr.c:648
 #1: ffff8880899d7a20 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9){++++}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:756 [inline]
 #1: ffff8880899d7a20 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9){++++}-{3:3}, at: vfs_setxattr+0x120/0x340 fs/xattr.c:322
 #2: ffff8880899d6ce0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:791 [inline]
 #2: ffff8880899d6ce0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: open_xa_root fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:127 [inline]
 #2: ffff8880899d6ce0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: open_xa_dir+0x127/0x830 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:152

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 19784 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc1-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0xd1/0x138 lib/dump_stack.c:106
 check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2177
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x2a43/0x56d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668 [inline]
 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x630 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5633
 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
 __mutex_lock+0x12f/0x1360 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
 reiserfs_write_lock+0x79/0x100 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27
 reiserfs_mkdir+0x31c/0x990 fs/reiserfs/namei.c:831
 xattr_mkdir fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:76 [inline]
 open_xa_root fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:136 [inline]
 open_xa_dir+0x6a3/0x830 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:152
 xattr_lookup+0x21/0x3d0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:395
 reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0xfb/0xb00 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:533
 reiserfs_xattr_set+0x454/0x5b0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:633
 trusted_set+0xa7/0xd0 fs/reiserfs/xattr_trusted.c:31
 __vfs_setxattr+0x173/0x1e0 fs/xattr.c:202
 __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x129/0x5f0 fs/xattr.c:236
 __vfs_setxattr_locked+0x1d3/0x260 fs/xattr.c:297
 vfs_setxattr+0x143/0x340 fs/xattr.c:323
 do_setxattr+0x151/0x190 fs/xattr.c:608
 setxattr+0x146/0x160 fs/xattr.c:631
 path_setxattr+0x197/0x1c0 fs/xattr.c:650
 __do_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:666 [inline]
 __se_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:662 [inline]
 __x64_sys_setxattr+0xc4/0x160 fs/xattr.c:662
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7fd78168c0a9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 19 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fd78242a168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000bc
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fd7817abf80 RCX: 00007fd78168c0a9
RDX: 0000000020000440 RSI: 00000000200002c0 RDI: 0000000020000280
RBP: 00007fd7816e7ae9 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 000000000000010c R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007fff9b71513f R14: 00007fd78242a300 R15: 0000000000022000
 </TASK>
REISERFS warning (device loop1): vs-13060 reiserfs_update_sd_size: stat data of object [3 6 0x0 SD] (nlink == 2) not found (pos 5)
REISERFS warning (device loop1): vs-13060 reiserfs_update_sd_size: stat data of object [3 6 0x0 SD] (nlink == 3) not found (pos 3)


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

             reply	other threads:[~2022-12-31  6:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-31  6:35 syzbot [this message]
2023-05-05  7:10 ` [syzbot] [reiserfs?] possible deadlock in open_xa_dir syzbot
2023-05-05 20:51 ` syzbot
2023-05-05 21:36   ` Paul Moore
2023-05-05 21:36     ` Paul Moore
2023-05-31  9:49     ` Roberto Sassu
2023-05-31  9:49       ` Roberto Sassu
2023-05-31  9:52       ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-01 21:22       ` Jeff Mahoney
2023-06-02  7:20         ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-02  7:20           ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-02  8:56           ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-02  9:17             ` syzbot
2023-06-02 16:18               ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-02 16:39                 ` syzbot
2023-06-02 16:46           ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-02 16:46             ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-01 20:19   ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-01 20:38     ` syzbot
2023-06-01 20:30   ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-01 20:57     ` syzbot
2024-03-09 22:20 ` syzbot
     [not found] <20230505075628.4150-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2023-05-05  8:32 ` syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0000000000007bedb605f119ed9f@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+8fb64a61fdd96b50f3b8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.