From: syzbot <syzbot+8fb64a61fdd96b50f3b8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [reiserfs?] possible deadlock in open_xa_dir
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 22:35:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0000000000007bedb605f119ed9f@google.com> (raw)
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 1b929c02afd3 Linux 6.2-rc1
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11da7f8c480000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2651619a26b4d687
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8fb64a61fdd96b50f3b8
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d562ace1a56c/disk-1b929c02.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/39f000fe6b9e/vmlinux-1b929c02.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/1c67e48de5a0/bzImage-1b929c02.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+8fb64a61fdd96b50f3b8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.2.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.1/19784 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88807d682090 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: reiserfs_write_lock+0x79/0x100 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880899d6ce0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:791 [inline]
ffff8880899d6ce0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: open_xa_root fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:127 [inline]
ffff8880899d6ce0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: open_xa_dir+0x127/0x830 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:152
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9/3){+.+.}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x98/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1672
inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:791 [inline]
open_xa_root fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:127 [inline]
open_xa_dir+0x127/0x830 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:152
reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x1ab/0x9a0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:252
reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x20/0xa0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:364
reiserfs_evict_inode+0x2e7/0x540 fs/reiserfs/inode.c:53
evict+0x2ed/0x6b0 fs/inode.c:664
iput_final fs/inode.c:1747 [inline]
iput.part.0+0x59b/0x880 fs/inode.c:1773
iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1763
reiserfs_create+0x65a/0x730 fs/reiserfs/namei.c:688
vfs_create fs/namei.c:3115 [inline]
vfs_create+0x3ed/0x670 fs/namei.c:3101
do_mknodat+0x3c4/0x510 fs/namei.c:3965
__do_sys_mknod fs/namei.c:3998 [inline]
__se_sys_mknod fs/namei.c:3996 [inline]
__x64_sys_mknod+0x11e/0x180 fs/namei.c:3996
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
-> #0 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2a43/0x56d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x630 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5633
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x12f/0x1360 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
reiserfs_write_lock+0x79/0x100 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27
reiserfs_mkdir+0x31c/0x990 fs/reiserfs/namei.c:831
xattr_mkdir fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:76 [inline]
open_xa_root fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:136 [inline]
open_xa_dir+0x6a3/0x830 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:152
xattr_lookup+0x21/0x3d0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:395
reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0xfb/0xb00 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:533
reiserfs_xattr_set+0x454/0x5b0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:633
trusted_set+0xa7/0xd0 fs/reiserfs/xattr_trusted.c:31
__vfs_setxattr+0x173/0x1e0 fs/xattr.c:202
__vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x129/0x5f0 fs/xattr.c:236
__vfs_setxattr_locked+0x1d3/0x260 fs/xattr.c:297
vfs_setxattr+0x143/0x340 fs/xattr.c:323
do_setxattr+0x151/0x190 fs/xattr.c:608
setxattr+0x146/0x160 fs/xattr.c:631
path_setxattr+0x197/0x1c0 fs/xattr.c:650
__do_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:666 [inline]
__se_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:662 [inline]
__x64_sys_setxattr+0xc4/0x160 fs/xattr.c:662
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9/3);
lock(&sbi->lock);
lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9/3);
lock(&sbi->lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by syz-executor.1/19784:
#0: ffff88801c7fe460 (sb_writers#17){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: path_setxattr+0xb2/0x1c0 fs/xattr.c:648
#1: ffff8880899d7a20 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9){++++}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:756 [inline]
#1: ffff8880899d7a20 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9){++++}-{3:3}, at: vfs_setxattr+0x120/0x340 fs/xattr.c:322
#2: ffff8880899d6ce0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:791 [inline]
#2: ffff8880899d6ce0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: open_xa_root fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:127 [inline]
#2: ffff8880899d6ce0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: open_xa_dir+0x127/0x830 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:152
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 19784 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc1-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xd1/0x138 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2177
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2a43/0x56d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x630 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5633
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x12f/0x1360 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
reiserfs_write_lock+0x79/0x100 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27
reiserfs_mkdir+0x31c/0x990 fs/reiserfs/namei.c:831
xattr_mkdir fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:76 [inline]
open_xa_root fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:136 [inline]
open_xa_dir+0x6a3/0x830 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:152
xattr_lookup+0x21/0x3d0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:395
reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0xfb/0xb00 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:533
reiserfs_xattr_set+0x454/0x5b0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:633
trusted_set+0xa7/0xd0 fs/reiserfs/xattr_trusted.c:31
__vfs_setxattr+0x173/0x1e0 fs/xattr.c:202
__vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x129/0x5f0 fs/xattr.c:236
__vfs_setxattr_locked+0x1d3/0x260 fs/xattr.c:297
vfs_setxattr+0x143/0x340 fs/xattr.c:323
do_setxattr+0x151/0x190 fs/xattr.c:608
setxattr+0x146/0x160 fs/xattr.c:631
path_setxattr+0x197/0x1c0 fs/xattr.c:650
__do_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:666 [inline]
__se_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:662 [inline]
__x64_sys_setxattr+0xc4/0x160 fs/xattr.c:662
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7fd78168c0a9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 19 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fd78242a168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000bc
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fd7817abf80 RCX: 00007fd78168c0a9
RDX: 0000000020000440 RSI: 00000000200002c0 RDI: 0000000020000280
RBP: 00007fd7816e7ae9 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 000000000000010c R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007fff9b71513f R14: 00007fd78242a300 R15: 0000000000022000
</TASK>
REISERFS warning (device loop1): vs-13060 reiserfs_update_sd_size: stat data of object [3 6 0x0 SD] (nlink == 2) not found (pos 5)
REISERFS warning (device loop1): vs-13060 reiserfs_update_sd_size: stat data of object [3 6 0x0 SD] (nlink == 3) not found (pos 3)
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
next reply other threads:[~2022-12-31 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-31 6:35 syzbot [this message]
2023-05-05 7:10 ` [syzbot] [reiserfs?] possible deadlock in open_xa_dir syzbot
2023-05-05 20:51 ` syzbot
2023-05-05 21:36 ` Paul Moore
2023-05-05 21:36 ` Paul Moore
2023-05-31 9:49 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-05-31 9:49 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-05-31 9:52 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-01 21:22 ` Jeff Mahoney
2023-06-02 7:20 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-02 7:20 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-02 8:56 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-02 9:17 ` syzbot
2023-06-02 16:18 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-02 16:39 ` syzbot
2023-06-02 16:46 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-02 16:46 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-01 20:19 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-01 20:38 ` syzbot
2023-06-01 20:30 ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-01 20:57 ` syzbot
2024-03-09 22:20 ` syzbot
[not found] <20230505075628.4150-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2023-05-05 8:32 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0000000000007bedb605f119ed9f@google.com \
--to=syzbot+8fb64a61fdd96b50f3b8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.