All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+8fb64a61fdd96b50f3b8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [reiserfs?] possible deadlock in open_xa_dir
Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 00:10:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000000000000959b3205faecfa72@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0000000000007bedb605f119ed9f@google.com>

syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    78b421b6a7c6 Merge tag 'linux-watchdog-6.4-rc1' of git://w..
git tree:       upstream
console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=150c42a8280000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=73a06f6ef2d5b492
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8fb64a61fdd96b50f3b8
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.7, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=14e2e518280000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=17c03112280000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/25168a5d3be8/disk-78b421b6.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f5af9f784d9d/vmlinux-78b421b6.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7781e4e3e606/bzImage-78b421b6.xz
mounted in repro: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/29a59b19c7a8/mount_0.gz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+8fb64a61fdd96b50f3b8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.3.0-syzkaller-13164-g78b421b6a7c6 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor363/4996 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888074558980 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:810 [inline]
ffff888074558980 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: open_xa_root fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:128 [inline]
ffff888074558980 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: open_xa_dir+0x136/0x610 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:153

but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880156f2090 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: reiserfs_write_lock_nested+0x5f/0xd0 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:78

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5691
       __mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
       __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
       mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
       reiserfs_write_lock+0x7a/0xd0 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27
       reiserfs_mkdir+0x321/0x8f0 fs/reiserfs/namei.c:829
       xattr_mkdir fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:77 [inline]
       open_xa_root fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:137 [inline]
       open_xa_dir+0x2cd/0x610 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:153
       xattr_lookup+0x24/0x280 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:396
       reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0xfc/0xdc0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:534
       reiserfs_security_write+0x157/0x1d0 fs/reiserfs/xattr_security.c:106
       reiserfs_new_inode+0x1631/0x1d40 fs/reiserfs/inode.c:2111
       reiserfs_create+0x3e7/0x6e0 fs/reiserfs/namei.c:666
       lookup_open fs/namei.c:3492 [inline]
       open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3560 [inline]
       path_openat+0x13df/0x3170 fs/namei.c:3788
       do_filp_open+0x234/0x490 fs/namei.c:3818
       do_sys_openat2+0x13f/0x500 fs/open.c:1356
       do_sys_open fs/open.c:1372 [inline]
       __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1388 [inline]
       __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1383 [inline]
       __x64_sys_openat+0x247/0x290 fs/open.c:1383
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/3){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3108 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3227 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x166b/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3842
       __lock_acquire+0x1295/0x2000 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5074
       lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5691
       down_write_nested+0x3d/0x50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1689
       inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:810 [inline]
       open_xa_root fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:128 [inline]
       open_xa_dir+0x136/0x610 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:153
       xattr_lookup+0x24/0x280 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:396
       reiserfs_xattr_get+0xfd/0x570 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:678
       __vfs_getxattr+0x436/0x470 fs/xattr.c:424
       smk_fetch+0xb1/0x140 security/smack/smack_lsm.c:295
       smack_d_instantiate+0x6d9/0xb40 security/smack/smack_lsm.c:3475
       security_d_instantiate+0x9b/0xf0 security/security.c:3760
       d_instantiate_new+0x65/0x120 fs/dcache.c:2053
       reiserfs_create+0x5cf/0x6e0 fs/reiserfs/namei.c:692
       lookup_open fs/namei.c:3492 [inline]
       open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3560 [inline]
       path_openat+0x13df/0x3170 fs/namei.c:3788
       do_filp_open+0x234/0x490 fs/namei.c:3818
       do_sys_openat2+0x13f/0x500 fs/open.c:1356
       do_sys_open fs/open.c:1372 [inline]
       __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1388 [inline]
       __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1383 [inline]
       __x64_sys_openat+0x247/0x290 fs/open.c:1383
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&sbi->lock);
                               lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/3);
                               lock(&sbi->lock);
  lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/3);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by syz-executor363/4996:
 #0: ffff88807c6be460 (sb_writers#9){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:394
 #1: ffff8880745582e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:775 [inline]
 #1: ffff8880745582e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3557 [inline]
 #1: ffff8880745582e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: path_openat+0x7ba/0x3170 fs/namei.c:3788
 #2: ffff8880156f2090 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: reiserfs_write_lock_nested+0x5f/0xd0 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:78

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 4996 Comm: syz-executor363 Not tainted 6.3.0-syzkaller-13164-g78b421b6a7c6 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/14/2023
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
 check_noncircular+0x2fe/0x3b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2188
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3108 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3227 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x166b/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3842
 __lock_acquire+0x1295/0x2000 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5074
 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5691
 down_write_nested+0x3d/0x50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1689
 inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:810 [inline]
 open_xa_root fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:128 [inline]
 open_xa_dir+0x136/0x610 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:153
 xattr_lookup+0x24/0x280 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:396
 reiserfs_xattr_get+0xfd/0x570 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:678
 __vfs_getxattr+0x436/0x470 fs/xattr.c:424
 smk_fetch+0xb1/0x140 security/smack/smack_lsm.c:295
 smack_d_instantiate+0x6d9/0xb40 security/smack/smack_lsm.c:3475
 security_d_instantiate+0x9b/0xf0 security/security.c:3760
 d_instantiate_new+0x65/0x120 fs/dcache.c:2053
 reiserfs_create+0x5cf/0x6e0 fs/reiserfs/namei.c:692
 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3492 [inline]
 open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3560 [inline]
 path_openat+0x13df/0x3170 fs/namei.c:3788
 do_filp_open+0x234/0x490 fs/namei.c:3818
 do_sys_openat2+0x13f/0x500 fs/open.c:1356
 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1372 [inline]
 __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1388 [inline]
 __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1383 [inline]
 __x64_sys_openat+0x247/0x290 fs/open.c:1383
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7fdd867933d9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 b1 14 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fdd867402f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fdd868196c0 RCX: 00007fdd867933d9
RDX: 000000000000275a RSI: 0000000020000080 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c


---
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-05  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-31  6:35 [syzbot] [reiserfs?] possible deadlock in open_xa_dir syzbot
2023-05-05  7:10 ` syzbot [this message]
2023-05-05 20:51 ` syzbot
2023-05-05 21:36   ` Paul Moore
2023-05-05 21:36     ` Paul Moore
2023-05-31  9:49     ` Roberto Sassu
2023-05-31  9:49       ` Roberto Sassu
2023-05-31  9:52       ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-01 21:22       ` Jeff Mahoney
2023-06-02  7:20         ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-02  7:20           ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-02  8:56           ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-02  9:17             ` syzbot
2023-06-02 16:18               ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-02 16:39                 ` syzbot
2023-06-02 16:46           ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-02 16:46             ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-01 20:19   ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-01 20:38     ` syzbot
2023-06-01 20:30   ` Roberto Sassu
2023-06-01 20:57     ` syzbot
2024-03-09 22:20 ` syzbot
     [not found] <20230505075628.4150-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2023-05-05  8:32 ` syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=000000000000959b3205faecfa72@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+8fb64a61fdd96b50f3b8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.