All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+9a5b0ced8b1bfb238b56@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: hdanton@sina.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [kernfs?] possible deadlock in kernfs_fop_llseek
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 18:08:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0000000000008885bc06153af8ef@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240404004257.3933-1-hdanton@sina.com>

Hello,

syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
possible deadlock in kernfs_fop_llseek

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.8.0-syzkaller-08951-gfe46a7dd189e-dirty #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.0/5486 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88807ec0b888 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_llseek+0x7e/0x2a0 fs/kernfs/file.c:867

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888050982238 (&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ovl_inode_lock fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:649 [inline]
ffff888050982238 (&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ovl_llseek+0x28a/0x4a0 fs/overlayfs/file.c:215

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
       ovl_inode_lock_interruptible fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:654 [inline]
       ovl_nlink_start+0xdc/0x390 fs/overlayfs/util.c:1162
       ovl_do_remove+0x1fa/0xd90 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:893
       vfs_rmdir+0x367/0x4c0 fs/namei.c:4209
       do_rmdir+0x3b5/0x580 fs/namei.c:4268
       __do_sys_rmdir fs/namei.c:4287 [inline]
       __se_sys_rmdir fs/namei.c:4285 [inline]
       __x64_sys_rmdir+0x49/0x60 fs/namei.c:4285
       do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75

-> #1 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}-{3:3}:
       lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       down_read+0xb1/0xa40 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1526
       inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:803 [inline]
       lookup_slow+0x45/0x70 fs/namei.c:1708
       walk_component+0x2e1/0x410 fs/namei.c:2004
       lookup_last fs/namei.c:2461 [inline]
       path_lookupat+0x16f/0x450 fs/namei.c:2485
       filename_lookup+0x256/0x610 fs/namei.c:2514
       kern_path+0x35/0x50 fs/namei.c:2622
       lookup_bdev+0xc5/0x290 block/bdev.c:1072
       resume_store+0x1a0/0x710 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1235
       kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3a4/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:334
       call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2108 [inline]
       new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]
       vfs_write+0xa84/0xcb0 fs/read_write.c:590
       ksys_write+0x1a0/0x2c0 fs/read_write.c:643
       do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75

-> #0 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
       __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
       lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
       kernfs_fop_llseek+0x7e/0x2a0 fs/kernfs/file.c:867
       ovl_llseek+0x335/0x4a0 fs/overlayfs/file.c:219
       vfs_llseek fs/read_write.c:289 [inline]
       ksys_lseek fs/read_write.c:302 [inline]
       __do_sys_lseek fs/read_write.c:313 [inline]
       __se_sys_lseek fs/read_write.c:311 [inline]
       __x64_sys_lseek+0x153/0x1e0 fs/read_write.c:311
       do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &of->mutex --> &ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth] --> &ovl_i_lock_key[depth]

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]);
                               lock(&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]);
                               lock(&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]);
  lock(&of->mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by syz-executor.0/5486:
 #0: ffff8880707c8ac8 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0x259/0x320 fs/file.c:1191
 #1: ffff888050981e80 (&ovl_i_mutex_key[depth]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:793 [inline]
 #1: ffff888050981e80 (&ovl_i_mutex_key[depth]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ovl_llseek+0x277/0x4a0 fs/overlayfs/file.c:207
 #2: ffff888050982238 (&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ovl_inode_lock fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:649 [inline]
 #2: ffff888050982238 (&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ovl_llseek+0x28a/0x4a0 fs/overlayfs/file.c:215

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 5486 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-08951-gfe46a7dd189e-dirty #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
 lock_acquire+0x1e4/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
 __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
 kernfs_fop_llseek+0x7e/0x2a0 fs/kernfs/file.c:867
 ovl_llseek+0x335/0x4a0 fs/overlayfs/file.c:219
 vfs_llseek fs/read_write.c:289 [inline]
 ksys_lseek fs/read_write.c:302 [inline]
 __do_sys_lseek fs/read_write.c:313 [inline]
 __se_sys_lseek fs/read_write.c:311 [inline]
 __x64_sys_lseek+0x153/0x1e0 fs/read_write.c:311
 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
RIP: 0033:0x7fe1f567dde9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fe1f64370c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000008
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fe1f57abf80 RCX: 00007fe1f567dde9
RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007fe1f56ca47a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fe1f57abf80 R15: 00007ffe353f4cc8
 </TASK>


Tested on:

commit:         fe46a7dd Merge tag 'sound-6.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel..
git tree:       https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=104e8475180000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=4d90a36f0cab495a
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9a5b0ced8b1bfb238b56
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
patch:          https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=1799f6ad180000


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-04  1:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-03 18:23 [syzbot] [kernfs?] possible deadlock in kernfs_fop_llseek syzbot
2024-04-03 23:51 ` syzbot
2024-04-04  6:54   ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-04  8:11     ` Al Viro
2024-04-04  8:21       ` Al Viro
2024-04-04  8:40         ` Al Viro
2024-04-04  9:33         ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-04 22:01           ` Al Viro
2024-04-05 10:34             ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-05  6:51           ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-05 11:19             ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-05 13:48               ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-05 14:52                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-05 15:41             ` Tejun Heo
2024-04-06  3:54             ` Al Viro
2024-04-05 10:47           ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-05 14:48             ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-06  4:09           ` Al Viro
2024-04-06  5:25             ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-05 15:08     ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-05 15:37       ` syzbot
2024-04-05 16:23         ` Al Viro
2024-04-06  5:34           ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-06  7:05             ` syzbot
2024-04-06  7:11               ` Al Viro
2024-04-06  8:23                 ` Hillf Danton
2024-04-07  0:48                   ` Al Viro
2024-04-06  8:57                 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-07  0:50                   ` Al Viro
2024-04-07 11:02                     ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-09  9:18                     ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-04  0:42 ` Hillf Danton
2024-04-04  1:08   ` syzbot [this message]
2024-04-04  2:12 ` Hillf Danton
2024-04-04  2:39   ` syzbot
2024-04-05 23:00 ` Hillf Danton
2024-04-05 23:02   ` syzbot
2024-04-06  0:10     ` Al Viro
2024-04-05 23:02 ` Hillf Danton
2024-04-06  0:34   ` syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0000000000008885bc06153af8ef@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+9a5b0ced8b1bfb238b56@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.