All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: chao@kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org,
	 linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [syzbot] [f2fs?] possible deadlock in f2fs_getxattr
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2023 21:13:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00000000000096797d06001a359d@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0000000000005921ef05ffddc3b7@google.com>

syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    c192ac735768 MAINTAINERS 2: Electric Boogaloo
git tree:       upstream
console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1115adb0a80000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=9831e2c2660aae77
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e5600587fa9cbf8e3826
compiler:       gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=136809b4a80000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=1484e74ca80000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/a05cca457512/disk-c192ac73.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/87f55eba1b87/vmlinux-c192ac73.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/81e9815bafe0/bzImage-c192ac73.xz
mounted in repro: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/45865ba5a074/mount_0.gz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.4.0-syzkaller-12491-gc192ac735768 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor225/5016 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888072747888 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline]
ffff888072747888 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_getxattr+0xb96/0xfd0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:532

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88807274b668 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline]
ffff88807274b668 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_do_tmpfile+0x24/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/dir.c:838

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       down_write+0x92/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573
       f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline]
       f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x2c4/0x6c0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644
       f2fs_add_dentry+0xa6/0x240 fs/f2fs/dir.c:784
       f2fs_do_add_link+0x183/0x270 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827
       f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline]
       f2fs_create+0x3c1/0x670 fs/f2fs/namei.c:377
       lookup_open.isra.0+0x1050/0x1400 fs/namei.c:3492
       open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3560 [inline]
       path_openat+0x969/0x2710 fs/namei.c:3790
       do_filp_open+0x1ba/0x410 fs/namei.c:3820
       do_sys_openat2+0x160/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1407
       do_sys_open fs/open.c:1422 [inline]
       __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1438 [inline]
       __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1433 [inline]
       __x64_sys_openat+0x143/0x1f0 fs/open.c:1433
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #0 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x2e9d/0x5e20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726
       down_read+0x9c/0x480 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520
       f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline]
       f2fs_getxattr+0xb96/0xfd0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:532
       __f2fs_get_acl+0x59/0x610 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179
       f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:377 [inline]
       f2fs_init_acl+0x152/0xb40 fs/f2fs/acl.c:420
       f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0x15d/0x1260 fs/f2fs/dir.c:558
       f2fs_do_tmpfile+0x33/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/dir.c:839
       __f2fs_tmpfile+0x1db/0x440 fs/f2fs/namei.c:884
       f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write+0xcf4/0x1330 fs/f2fs/file.c:2099
       __f2fs_ioctl+0x317f/0xa5f0 fs/f2fs/file.c:4195
       f2fs_ioctl+0x194/0x220 fs/f2fs/file.c:4287
       vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
       __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
       __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x19d/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:856
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&fi->i_sem);
                               lock(&fi->i_xattr_sem);
                               lock(&fi->i_sem);
  rlock(&fi->i_xattr_sem);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

5 locks held by syz-executor225/5016:
 #0: ffff88807a306410 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write+0x1a7/0x1330 fs/f2fs/file.c:2056
 #1: ffff888072749250 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:771 [inline]
 #1: ffff888072749250 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write+0x1e3/0x1330 fs/f2fs/file.c:2060
 #2: ffff888072749830 (&fi->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline]
 #2: ffff888072749830 (&fi->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write+0x2e6/0x1330 fs/f2fs/file.c:2074
 #3: ffff88807ba403b0 (&sbi->cp_rwsem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline]
 #3: ffff88807ba403b0 (&sbi->cp_rwsem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_lock_op fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2151 [inline]
 #3: ffff88807ba403b0 (&sbi->cp_rwsem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: __f2fs_tmpfile+0x1ae/0x440 fs/f2fs/namei.c:879
 #4: ffff88807274b668 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline]
 #4: ffff88807274b668 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_do_tmpfile+0x24/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/dir.c:838

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 5016 Comm: syz-executor225 Not tainted 6.4.0-syzkaller-12491-gc192ac735768 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/03/2023
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:106
 check_noncircular+0x2df/0x3b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x2e9d/0x5e20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline]
 lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726
 down_read+0x9c/0x480 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520
 f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline]
 f2fs_getxattr+0xb96/0xfd0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:532
 __f2fs_get_acl+0x59/0x610 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179
 f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:377 [inline]
 f2fs_init_acl+0x152/0xb40 fs/f2fs/acl.c:420
 f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0x15d/0x1260 fs/f2fs/dir.c:558
 f2fs_do_tmpfile+0x33/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/dir.c:839
 __f2fs_tmpfile+0x1db/0x440 fs/f2fs/namei.c:884
 f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write+0xcf4/0x1330 fs/f2fs/file.c:2099
 __f2fs_ioctl+0x317f/0xa5f0 fs/f2fs/file.c:4195
 f2fs_ioctl+0x194/0x220 fs/f2fs/file.c:4287
 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
 __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x19d/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:856
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7fe30f74c969
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 51 14 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffc55cdfb78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fe30f74c969
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000f501 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007fe30f70c200 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 00000000


---
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: syzbot <syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: chao@kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [f2fs?] possible deadlock in f2fs_getxattr
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2023 21:13:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00000000000096797d06001a359d@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0000000000005921ef05ffddc3b7@google.com>

syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    c192ac735768 MAINTAINERS 2: Electric Boogaloo
git tree:       upstream
console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1115adb0a80000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=9831e2c2660aae77
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e5600587fa9cbf8e3826
compiler:       gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=136809b4a80000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=1484e74ca80000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/a05cca457512/disk-c192ac73.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/87f55eba1b87/vmlinux-c192ac73.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/81e9815bafe0/bzImage-c192ac73.xz
mounted in repro: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/45865ba5a074/mount_0.gz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.4.0-syzkaller-12491-gc192ac735768 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor225/5016 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888072747888 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline]
ffff888072747888 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_getxattr+0xb96/0xfd0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:532

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88807274b668 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline]
ffff88807274b668 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_do_tmpfile+0x24/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/dir.c:838

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       down_write+0x92/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573
       f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline]
       f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x2c4/0x6c0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644
       f2fs_add_dentry+0xa6/0x240 fs/f2fs/dir.c:784
       f2fs_do_add_link+0x183/0x270 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827
       f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline]
       f2fs_create+0x3c1/0x670 fs/f2fs/namei.c:377
       lookup_open.isra.0+0x1050/0x1400 fs/namei.c:3492
       open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3560 [inline]
       path_openat+0x969/0x2710 fs/namei.c:3790
       do_filp_open+0x1ba/0x410 fs/namei.c:3820
       do_sys_openat2+0x160/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1407
       do_sys_open fs/open.c:1422 [inline]
       __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1438 [inline]
       __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1433 [inline]
       __x64_sys_openat+0x143/0x1f0 fs/open.c:1433
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #0 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x2e9d/0x5e20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726
       down_read+0x9c/0x480 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520
       f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline]
       f2fs_getxattr+0xb96/0xfd0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:532
       __f2fs_get_acl+0x59/0x610 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179
       f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:377 [inline]
       f2fs_init_acl+0x152/0xb40 fs/f2fs/acl.c:420
       f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0x15d/0x1260 fs/f2fs/dir.c:558
       f2fs_do_tmpfile+0x33/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/dir.c:839
       __f2fs_tmpfile+0x1db/0x440 fs/f2fs/namei.c:884
       f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write+0xcf4/0x1330 fs/f2fs/file.c:2099
       __f2fs_ioctl+0x317f/0xa5f0 fs/f2fs/file.c:4195
       f2fs_ioctl+0x194/0x220 fs/f2fs/file.c:4287
       vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
       __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
       __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x19d/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:856
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&fi->i_sem);
                               lock(&fi->i_xattr_sem);
                               lock(&fi->i_sem);
  rlock(&fi->i_xattr_sem);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

5 locks held by syz-executor225/5016:
 #0: ffff88807a306410 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write+0x1a7/0x1330 fs/f2fs/file.c:2056
 #1: ffff888072749250 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:771 [inline]
 #1: ffff888072749250 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write+0x1e3/0x1330 fs/f2fs/file.c:2060
 #2: ffff888072749830 (&fi->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline]
 #2: ffff888072749830 (&fi->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write+0x2e6/0x1330 fs/f2fs/file.c:2074
 #3: ffff88807ba403b0 (&sbi->cp_rwsem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline]
 #3: ffff88807ba403b0 (&sbi->cp_rwsem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_lock_op fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2151 [inline]
 #3: ffff88807ba403b0 (&sbi->cp_rwsem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: __f2fs_tmpfile+0x1ae/0x440 fs/f2fs/namei.c:879
 #4: ffff88807274b668 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline]
 #4: ffff88807274b668 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_do_tmpfile+0x24/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/dir.c:838

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 5016 Comm: syz-executor225 Not tainted 6.4.0-syzkaller-12491-gc192ac735768 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/03/2023
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:106
 check_noncircular+0x2df/0x3b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x2e9d/0x5e20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline]
 lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726
 down_read+0x9c/0x480 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520
 f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline]
 f2fs_getxattr+0xb96/0xfd0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:532
 __f2fs_get_acl+0x59/0x610 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179
 f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:377 [inline]
 f2fs_init_acl+0x152/0xb40 fs/f2fs/acl.c:420
 f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0x15d/0x1260 fs/f2fs/dir.c:558
 f2fs_do_tmpfile+0x33/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/dir.c:839
 __f2fs_tmpfile+0x1db/0x440 fs/f2fs/namei.c:884
 f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write+0xcf4/0x1330 fs/f2fs/file.c:2099
 __f2fs_ioctl+0x317f/0xa5f0 fs/f2fs/file.c:4195
 f2fs_ioctl+0x194/0x220 fs/f2fs/file.c:4287
 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
 __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x19d/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:856
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7fe30f74c969
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 51 14 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffc55cdfb78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fe30f74c969
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000f501 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007fe30f70c200 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 00000000


---
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-10  4:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-07  4:06 [f2fs-dev] [syzbot] [f2fs?] possible deadlock in f2fs_getxattr syzbot
2023-07-07  4:06 ` syzbot
2023-07-10  4:13 ` syzbot [this message]
2023-07-10  4:13   ` syzbot
2023-07-14 15:11 ` [f2fs-dev] " syzbot
2023-07-14 15:11   ` syzbot
2023-08-18 19:51 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2023-08-18 19:51   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2023-08-18 19:51   ` [f2fs-dev] " syzbot
2023-08-18 19:51     ` syzbot
2023-08-18 20:15 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2023-08-18 20:15   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2023-08-18 21:02   ` [f2fs-dev] " syzbot
2023-08-18 21:02     ` syzbot
2023-08-18 21:15 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2023-08-18 21:15   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2023-08-18 21:49   ` [f2fs-dev] " syzbot
2023-08-18 21:49     ` syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=00000000000096797d06001a359d@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.