From: syzbot <syzbot+903a7b353239d83ad434-Pl5Pbv+GP7P466ipTTIvnc23WoclnBCfAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
To: konishi.ryusuke-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-nilfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
syzkaller-bugs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
Subject: [syzbot] [nilfs?] possible deadlock in nilfs_dirty_inode
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 07:49:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0000000000009be70d05ff097338@google.com> (raw)
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: dad9774deaf1 Merge tag 'timers-urgent-2023-06-21' of git:/..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=106a4b33280000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2cbd298d0aff1140
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=903a7b353239d83ad434
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
userspace arch: i386
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7bc7510fe41f/non_bootable_disk-dad9774d.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/04ba8cb302c4/vmlinux-dad9774d.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/9b26d41c591b/bzImage-dad9774d.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+903a7b353239d83ad434-Pl5Pbv+GP7P466ipTTIvnc23WoclnBCfAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.4.0-rc7-syzkaller-00072-gdad9774deaf1 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/111 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888050c6e650 (sb_internal#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: nilfs_dirty_inode+0x18a/0x260 fs/nilfs2/inode.c:1147
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8c8efae0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_task_reclaim_state mm/vmscan.c:512 [inline]
ffffffff8c8efae0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x170/0x1ac0 mm/vmscan.c:7349
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
__fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3893 [inline]
fs_reclaim_acquire+0x11d/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3907
might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:303 [inline]
prepare_alloc_pages+0x159/0x570 mm/page_alloc.c:4539
__alloc_pages+0x149/0x4a0 mm/page_alloc.c:4757
alloc_pages+0x1aa/0x270 mm/mempolicy.c:2279
folio_alloc+0x20/0x70 mm/mempolicy.c:2289
filemap_alloc_folio+0x3c1/0x470 mm/filemap.c:976
__filemap_get_folio+0x2a6/0x990 mm/filemap.c:1971
pagecache_get_page+0x2e/0x270 mm/folio-compat.c:99
block_write_begin+0x35/0x4d0 fs/buffer.c:2171
nilfs_write_begin+0xa0/0x1a0 fs/nilfs2/inode.c:261
page_symlink+0x386/0x480 fs/namei.c:5193
nilfs_symlink+0x235/0x3c0 fs/nilfs2/namei.c:153
vfs_symlink fs/namei.c:4475 [inline]
vfs_symlink+0x10c/0x2c0 fs/namei.c:4459
do_symlinkat+0x262/0x2e0 fs/namei.c:4501
__do_sys_symlinkat fs/namei.c:4517 [inline]
__se_sys_symlinkat fs/namei.c:4514 [inline]
__ia32_sys_symlinkat+0x97/0xc0 fs/namei.c:4514
do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:112 [inline]
__do_fast_syscall_32+0x65/0xf0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:178
do_fast_syscall_32+0x33/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:203
entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x70/0x82
-> #1 (&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem){++++}-{3:3}:
down_read+0x9c/0x480 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520
nilfs_transaction_begin+0x31a/0xa20 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:223
nilfs_create+0x9b/0x300 fs/nilfs2/namei.c:82
lookup_open.isra.0+0x105a/0x1400 fs/namei.c:3492
open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3560 [inline]
path_openat+0x975/0x2750 fs/namei.c:3788
do_filp_open+0x1ba/0x410 fs/namei.c:3818
do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x4c0 fs/open.c:1356
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1372 [inline]
__do_compat_sys_open fs/open.c:1423 [inline]
__se_compat_sys_open fs/open.c:1421 [inline]
__ia32_compat_sys_open+0x11d/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1421
do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:112 [inline]
__do_fast_syscall_32+0x65/0xf0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:178
do_fast_syscall_32+0x33/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:203
entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x70/0x82
-> #0 (sb_internal#3){.+.+}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3113 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3232 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3847 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2fcd/0x5f30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5088
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5705 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5670
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1494 [inline]
sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1616 [inline]
nilfs_transaction_begin+0x21e/0xa20 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:220
nilfs_dirty_inode+0x18a/0x260 fs/nilfs2/inode.c:1147
__mark_inode_dirty+0x1e0/0xd60 fs/fs-writeback.c:2424
mark_inode_dirty_sync include/linux/fs.h:2149 [inline]
iput.part.0+0x57/0x740 fs/inode.c:1770
iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1763
dentry_unlink_inode+0x2b1/0x460 fs/dcache.c:401
__dentry_kill+0x3c0/0x640 fs/dcache.c:607
shrink_dentry_list+0x12c/0x4f0 fs/dcache.c:1201
prune_dcache_sb+0xeb/0x150 fs/dcache.c:1282
super_cache_scan+0x33a/0x590 fs/super.c:104
do_shrink_slab+0x428/0xaa0 mm/vmscan.c:895
shrink_slab_memcg mm/vmscan.c:964 [inline]
shrink_slab+0x38f/0x6c0 mm/vmscan.c:1043
shrink_one+0x4f9/0x710 mm/vmscan.c:5365
shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:5415 [inline]
lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5532 [inline]
shrink_node+0x1fd5/0x3500 mm/vmscan.c:6473
kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:7273 [inline]
balance_pgdat+0xa02/0x1ac0 mm/vmscan.c:7463
kswapd+0x677/0xd60 mm/vmscan.c:7723
kthread+0x344/0x440 kernel/kthread.c:379
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
sb_internal#3 --> &nilfs->ns_segctor_sem --> fs_reclaim
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
lock(fs_reclaim);
rlock(sb_internal#3);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by kswapd0/111:
#0: ffffffff8c8efae0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_task_reclaim_state mm/vmscan.c:512 [inline]
#0: ffffffff8c8efae0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x170/0x1ac0 mm/vmscan.c:7349
#1: ffffffff8c8a3b10 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab_memcg mm/vmscan.c:937 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8c8a3b10 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x2a0/0x6c0 mm/vmscan.c:1043
#2: ffff888050c6e0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#61){++++}-{3:3}, at: trylock_super fs/super.c:414 [inline]
#2: ffff888050c6e0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#61){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x70/0x590 fs/super.c:79
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 111 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 6.4.0-rc7-syzkaller-00072-gdad9774deaf1 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2188
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3113 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3232 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3847 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2fcd/0x5f30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5088
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5705 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5670
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1494 [inline]
sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1616 [inline]
nilfs_transaction_begin+0x21e/0xa20 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:220
nilfs_dirty_inode+0x18a/0x260 fs/nilfs2/inode.c:1147
__mark_inode_dirty+0x1e0/0xd60 fs/fs-writeback.c:2424
mark_inode_dirty_sync include/linux/fs.h:2149 [inline]
iput.part.0+0x57/0x740 fs/inode.c:1770
iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1763
dentry_unlink_inode+0x2b1/0x460 fs/dcache.c:401
__dentry_kill+0x3c0/0x640 fs/dcache.c:607
shrink_dentry_list+0x12c/0x4f0 fs/dcache.c:1201
prune_dcache_sb+0xeb/0x150 fs/dcache.c:1282
super_cache_scan+0x33a/0x590 fs/super.c:104
do_shrink_slab+0x428/0xaa0 mm/vmscan.c:895
shrink_slab_memcg mm/vmscan.c:964 [inline]
shrink_slab+0x38f/0x6c0 mm/vmscan.c:1043
shrink_one+0x4f9/0x710 mm/vmscan.c:5365
shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:5415 [inline]
lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5532 [inline]
shrink_node+0x1fd5/0x3500 mm/vmscan.c:6473
kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:7273 [inline]
balance_pgdat+0xa02/0x1ac0 mm/vmscan.c:7463
kswapd+0x677/0xd60 mm/vmscan.c:7723
kthread+0x344/0x440 kernel/kthread.c:379
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the bug is already fixed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want to change bug's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the bug is a duplicate of another bug, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: syzbot <syzbot+903a7b353239d83ad434@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [nilfs?] possible deadlock in nilfs_dirty_inode
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 07:49:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0000000000009be70d05ff097338@google.com> (raw)
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: dad9774deaf1 Merge tag 'timers-urgent-2023-06-21' of git:/..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=106a4b33280000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2cbd298d0aff1140
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=903a7b353239d83ad434
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
userspace arch: i386
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7bc7510fe41f/non_bootable_disk-dad9774d.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/04ba8cb302c4/vmlinux-dad9774d.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/9b26d41c591b/bzImage-dad9774d.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+903a7b353239d83ad434@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.4.0-rc7-syzkaller-00072-gdad9774deaf1 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/111 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888050c6e650 (sb_internal#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: nilfs_dirty_inode+0x18a/0x260 fs/nilfs2/inode.c:1147
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8c8efae0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_task_reclaim_state mm/vmscan.c:512 [inline]
ffffffff8c8efae0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x170/0x1ac0 mm/vmscan.c:7349
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
__fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3893 [inline]
fs_reclaim_acquire+0x11d/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3907
might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:303 [inline]
prepare_alloc_pages+0x159/0x570 mm/page_alloc.c:4539
__alloc_pages+0x149/0x4a0 mm/page_alloc.c:4757
alloc_pages+0x1aa/0x270 mm/mempolicy.c:2279
folio_alloc+0x20/0x70 mm/mempolicy.c:2289
filemap_alloc_folio+0x3c1/0x470 mm/filemap.c:976
__filemap_get_folio+0x2a6/0x990 mm/filemap.c:1971
pagecache_get_page+0x2e/0x270 mm/folio-compat.c:99
block_write_begin+0x35/0x4d0 fs/buffer.c:2171
nilfs_write_begin+0xa0/0x1a0 fs/nilfs2/inode.c:261
page_symlink+0x386/0x480 fs/namei.c:5193
nilfs_symlink+0x235/0x3c0 fs/nilfs2/namei.c:153
vfs_symlink fs/namei.c:4475 [inline]
vfs_symlink+0x10c/0x2c0 fs/namei.c:4459
do_symlinkat+0x262/0x2e0 fs/namei.c:4501
__do_sys_symlinkat fs/namei.c:4517 [inline]
__se_sys_symlinkat fs/namei.c:4514 [inline]
__ia32_sys_symlinkat+0x97/0xc0 fs/namei.c:4514
do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:112 [inline]
__do_fast_syscall_32+0x65/0xf0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:178
do_fast_syscall_32+0x33/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:203
entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x70/0x82
-> #1 (&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem){++++}-{3:3}:
down_read+0x9c/0x480 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520
nilfs_transaction_begin+0x31a/0xa20 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:223
nilfs_create+0x9b/0x300 fs/nilfs2/namei.c:82
lookup_open.isra.0+0x105a/0x1400 fs/namei.c:3492
open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3560 [inline]
path_openat+0x975/0x2750 fs/namei.c:3788
do_filp_open+0x1ba/0x410 fs/namei.c:3818
do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x4c0 fs/open.c:1356
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1372 [inline]
__do_compat_sys_open fs/open.c:1423 [inline]
__se_compat_sys_open fs/open.c:1421 [inline]
__ia32_compat_sys_open+0x11d/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1421
do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:112 [inline]
__do_fast_syscall_32+0x65/0xf0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:178
do_fast_syscall_32+0x33/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:203
entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x70/0x82
-> #0 (sb_internal#3){.+.+}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3113 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3232 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3847 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2fcd/0x5f30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5088
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5705 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5670
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1494 [inline]
sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1616 [inline]
nilfs_transaction_begin+0x21e/0xa20 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:220
nilfs_dirty_inode+0x18a/0x260 fs/nilfs2/inode.c:1147
__mark_inode_dirty+0x1e0/0xd60 fs/fs-writeback.c:2424
mark_inode_dirty_sync include/linux/fs.h:2149 [inline]
iput.part.0+0x57/0x740 fs/inode.c:1770
iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1763
dentry_unlink_inode+0x2b1/0x460 fs/dcache.c:401
__dentry_kill+0x3c0/0x640 fs/dcache.c:607
shrink_dentry_list+0x12c/0x4f0 fs/dcache.c:1201
prune_dcache_sb+0xeb/0x150 fs/dcache.c:1282
super_cache_scan+0x33a/0x590 fs/super.c:104
do_shrink_slab+0x428/0xaa0 mm/vmscan.c:895
shrink_slab_memcg mm/vmscan.c:964 [inline]
shrink_slab+0x38f/0x6c0 mm/vmscan.c:1043
shrink_one+0x4f9/0x710 mm/vmscan.c:5365
shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:5415 [inline]
lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5532 [inline]
shrink_node+0x1fd5/0x3500 mm/vmscan.c:6473
kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:7273 [inline]
balance_pgdat+0xa02/0x1ac0 mm/vmscan.c:7463
kswapd+0x677/0xd60 mm/vmscan.c:7723
kthread+0x344/0x440 kernel/kthread.c:379
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
sb_internal#3 --> &nilfs->ns_segctor_sem --> fs_reclaim
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
lock(fs_reclaim);
rlock(sb_internal#3);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by kswapd0/111:
#0: ffffffff8c8efae0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_task_reclaim_state mm/vmscan.c:512 [inline]
#0: ffffffff8c8efae0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x170/0x1ac0 mm/vmscan.c:7349
#1: ffffffff8c8a3b10 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab_memcg mm/vmscan.c:937 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8c8a3b10 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x2a0/0x6c0 mm/vmscan.c:1043
#2: ffff888050c6e0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#61){++++}-{3:3}, at: trylock_super fs/super.c:414 [inline]
#2: ffff888050c6e0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#61){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x70/0x590 fs/super.c:79
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 111 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 6.4.0-rc7-syzkaller-00072-gdad9774deaf1 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2188
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3113 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3232 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3847 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2fcd/0x5f30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5088
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5705 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5670
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1494 [inline]
sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1616 [inline]
nilfs_transaction_begin+0x21e/0xa20 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:220
nilfs_dirty_inode+0x18a/0x260 fs/nilfs2/inode.c:1147
__mark_inode_dirty+0x1e0/0xd60 fs/fs-writeback.c:2424
mark_inode_dirty_sync include/linux/fs.h:2149 [inline]
iput.part.0+0x57/0x740 fs/inode.c:1770
iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1763
dentry_unlink_inode+0x2b1/0x460 fs/dcache.c:401
__dentry_kill+0x3c0/0x640 fs/dcache.c:607
shrink_dentry_list+0x12c/0x4f0 fs/dcache.c:1201
prune_dcache_sb+0xeb/0x150 fs/dcache.c:1282
super_cache_scan+0x33a/0x590 fs/super.c:104
do_shrink_slab+0x428/0xaa0 mm/vmscan.c:895
shrink_slab_memcg mm/vmscan.c:964 [inline]
shrink_slab+0x38f/0x6c0 mm/vmscan.c:1043
shrink_one+0x4f9/0x710 mm/vmscan.c:5365
shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:5415 [inline]
lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5532 [inline]
shrink_node+0x1fd5/0x3500 mm/vmscan.c:6473
kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:7273 [inline]
balance_pgdat+0xa02/0x1ac0 mm/vmscan.c:7463
kswapd+0x677/0xd60 mm/vmscan.c:7723
kthread+0x344/0x440 kernel/kthread.c:379
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the bug is already fixed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want to change bug's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the bug is a duplicate of another bug, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
next reply other threads:[~2023-06-26 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-26 14:49 syzbot [this message]
2023-06-26 14:49 ` [syzbot] [nilfs?] possible deadlock in nilfs_dirty_inode syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0000000000009be70d05ff097338@google.com \
--to=syzbot+903a7b353239d83ad434-pl5pbv+gp7p466ipttivnc23woclnbcfal8byrjmmd8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=konishi.ryusuke-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nilfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.