* Speeding up Linux kernel compiles using -pipe?
@ 2003-06-25 4:22 Shawn Starr
2003-06-25 4:55 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-06-25 5:29 ` Anton Blanchard
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Starr @ 2003-06-25 4:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Why aren't we using -pipe? It can significantly speed up compiles by not
writing temp files (intermediate files).
I don't see harm in adding this?
What do you all think?
Shawn.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Speeding up Linux kernel compiles using -pipe?
2003-06-25 4:22 Speeding up Linux kernel compiles using -pipe? Shawn Starr
@ 2003-06-25 4:55 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-06-25 5:29 ` Anton Blanchard
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2003-06-25 4:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shawn Starr; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 12:22:13AM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote:
> Why aren't we using -pipe? It can significantly speed up compiles by not
> writing temp files (intermediate files).
Most architectures already uses -pipe - see arch/*/Makefile:
[sam@mars v2.5]$ ls arch/*/Makefile | xargs grep -l -- -pipe | wc -l
17
[sam@mars v2.5]$ ls arch/*/Makefile | wc -l
21
Sam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Speeding up Linux kernel compiles using -pipe?
2003-06-25 4:22 Speeding up Linux kernel compiles using -pipe? Shawn Starr
2003-06-25 4:55 ` Sam Ravnborg
@ 2003-06-25 5:29 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-06-26 1:01 ` Shawn Starr
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anton Blanchard @ 2003-06-25 5:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shawn Starr; +Cc: linux-kernel
> Why aren't we using -pipe? It can significantly speed up compiles by not
> writing temp files (intermediate files).
I thought we were. Do you have results to show it speeds up kernel
compiles? I found the opposite when using ext2:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0212.1/0040.html
Anton
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: Speeding up Linux kernel compiles using -pipe?
2003-06-25 5:29 ` Anton Blanchard
@ 2003-06-26 1:01 ` Shawn Starr
2003-06-26 8:34 ` Mike Galbraith
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Starr @ 2003-06-26 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Anton Blanchard'; +Cc: linux-kernel
Nevermind, We are using pipe, I just didn't see due to the new Makefile
output (V=1) shows me we are using pipe, at least for ia32.
Shawn S.
-----Original Message-----
From: Anton Blanchard [mailto:anton@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 1:30 AM
To: Shawn Starr
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Speeding up Linux kernel compiles using -pipe?
> Why aren't we using -pipe? It can significantly speed up compiles by
> not writing temp files (intermediate files).
I thought we were. Do you have results to show it speeds up kernel compiles?
I found the opposite when using ext2:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0212.1/0040.html
Anton
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: Speeding up Linux kernel compiles using -pipe?
2003-06-26 1:01 ` Shawn Starr
@ 2003-06-26 8:34 ` Mike Galbraith
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mike Galbraith @ 2003-06-26 8:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shawn Starr; +Cc: 'Anton Blanchard', linux-kernel
At 09:01 PM 6/25/2003 -0400, Shawn Starr wrote:
>Nevermind, We are using pipe, I just didn't see due to the new Makefile
>output (V=1) shows me we are using pipe, at least for ia32.
Unless something has changed recently, -pipe is actually a slowdown.
-Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-06-26 8:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-06-25 4:22 Speeding up Linux kernel compiles using -pipe? Shawn Starr
2003-06-25 4:55 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-06-25 5:29 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-06-26 1:01 ` Shawn Starr
2003-06-26 8:34 ` Mike Galbraith
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.