* [PATCH] rtc: rtc-pcf2123: replace strict_strtoul() with kstrtoul()
@ 2013-06-01 7:31 Jingoo Han
2013-06-02 11:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jingoo Han @ 2013-06-01 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Andrew Morton'
Cc: linux-kernel, 'Alessandro Zummo', rtc-linux,
'Jingoo Han'
The usage of strict_strtoul() is not preferred, because
strict_strtoul() is obsolete. Thus, kstrtoul() should be
used.
Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2123.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2123.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2123.c
index b2a78a0..4130e6b 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2123.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2123.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static ssize_t pcf2123_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
r = container_of(attr, struct pcf2123_sysfs_reg, attr);
- if (strict_strtoul(r->name, 16, ®))
+ if (kstrtoul(r->name, 16, ®))
return -EINVAL;
txbuf[0] = PCF2123_READ | reg;
@@ -117,8 +117,7 @@ static ssize_t pcf2123_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
r = container_of(attr, struct pcf2123_sysfs_reg, attr);
- if (strict_strtoul(r->name, 16, ®)
- || strict_strtoul(buffer, 10, &val))
+ if (kstrtoul(r->name, 16, ®) || kstrtoul(buffer, 10, &val))
return -EINVAL;
txbuf[0] = PCF2123_WRITE | reg;
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-pcf2123: replace strict_strtoul() with kstrtoul()
2013-06-01 7:31 [PATCH] rtc: rtc-pcf2123: replace strict_strtoul() with kstrtoul() Jingoo Han
@ 2013-06-02 11:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-03 7:05 ` Jingoo Han
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2013-06-02 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jingoo Han
Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alessandro Zummo,
rtc-linux
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com> wrote:
> The usage of strict_strtoul() is not preferred, because
> strict_strtoul() is obsolete. Thus, kstrtoul() should be
> used.
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2123.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2123.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static ssize_t pcf2123_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>
> r = container_of(attr, struct pcf2123_sysfs_reg, attr);
>
> - if (strict_strtoul(r->name, 16, ®))
> + if (kstrtoul(r->name, 16, ®))
> return -EINVAL;
ret = kstrtoul(...);
if (ret)
return ret;
> @@ -117,8 +117,7 @@ static ssize_t pcf2123_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>
> r = container_of(attr, struct pcf2123_sysfs_reg, attr);
>
> - if (strict_strtoul(r->name, 16, ®)
> - || strict_strtoul(buffer, 10, &val))
> + if (kstrtoul(r->name, 16, ®) || kstrtoul(buffer, 10, &val))
> return -EINVAL;
I see no harm to allow user to write octal values as well.
Thus, just
ret = kstrtoul(r->name, 0, ®);
if (ret)
return ret;
Alessandro, what do you think?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-pcf2123: replace strict_strtoul() with kstrtoul()
2013-06-02 11:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2013-06-03 7:05 ` Jingoo Han
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jingoo Han @ 2013-06-03 7:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Andy Shevchenko'
Cc: 'Andrew Morton', linux-kernel, 'Alessandro Zummo',
rtc-linux, Jingoo Han
On Sunday, June 02, 2013 8:56 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com> wrote:
> > The usage of strict_strtoul() is not preferred, because
> > strict_strtoul() is obsolete. Thus, kstrtoul() should be
> > used.
>
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2123.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2123.c
> > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static ssize_t pcf2123_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> >
> > r = container_of(attr, struct pcf2123_sysfs_reg, attr);
> >
> > - if (strict_strtoul(r->name, 16, ®))
> > + if (kstrtoul(r->name, 16, ®))
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> ret = kstrtoul(...);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> > @@ -117,8 +117,7 @@ static ssize_t pcf2123_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> >
> > r = container_of(attr, struct pcf2123_sysfs_reg, attr);
> >
> > - if (strict_strtoul(r->name, 16, ®)
> > - || strict_strtoul(buffer, 10, &val))
> > + if (kstrtoul(r->name, 16, ®) || kstrtoul(buffer, 10, &val))
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> I see no harm to allow user to write octal values as well.
> Thus, just
> ret = kstrtoul(r->name, 0, ®);
If you want to do this, please send another patch later, on top of this patch.
I just want to address the replacing strict_strtoul() with kstrtoul().
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> Alessandro, what do you think?
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-03 7:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-06-01 7:31 [PATCH] rtc: rtc-pcf2123: replace strict_strtoul() with kstrtoul() Jingoo Han
2013-06-02 11:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-03 7:05 ` Jingoo Han
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.