Re: How to power on Intel x86 based CPUs

Re: How to power on Intel x86 based CPUs

[Yong Li]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 186 bytes --]

Hi Brad,

We(Intel) finished chassis/power control based on sdbusplus for Intel
platforms, and starting to upstream. 
Official release will be available in github soon.

Thanks,
Yong Li

[-- Attachment #2: winmail.dat --]
[-- Type: application/ms-tnef, Size: 2290 bytes --]

Re: How to power on Intel x86 based CPUs

[Brad Chou]

Hi Yong,
Great, this is a good news.
I am using GPIO scripts to control CPU on/off in chassis services as Quanta-q71L does.
So I can just power on/off it by systemctl commands.
It is more preferred to use D-bus interface, so maybe I can also use REST to do power control stuff.
Thanks.


> On May 23, 2018, at 13:04, Yong Li <yong.b.li@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Brad,
> 
> We(Intel) finished chassis/power control based on sdbusplus for Intel
> platforms, and starting to upstream. 
> Official release will be available in github soon.
> 
> Thanks,
> Yong Li
> <winmail.dat>

How to power on Intel x86 based CPUs

[Brad Chou]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 815 bytes --]

Hi,
I am going to power on my OEM server board with two Intel x86 CPUs. The BMC chip is ASPEED 2500.

By the Intel data sheets, I just need to control a power on GPIO to emulate power button behavior.
The problems are, when I send Host State Control commands as mentioned in docs/host-management.md, the journal log shows a lot of systemctl errors.

Looks like it is going to start the OpenPower related host control services, which only applies to PowerPC system.
I try to modify GPIO_CONFIGS appears in skeleton recipe to match my board, but I still got some other errors says pflash stuffs.

Because there is no documents to tell me how to customize the openbmc to fit on x86 CPUs, so I am not sure the GPIO_CONFIGS in skeleton is the right way or not.

Can somebody share your experience ?

Thanks.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1638 bytes --]

Re: How to power on Intel x86 based CPUs

[Andrew Jeffery]

Hi Brad,

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, at 19:35, Brad Chou wrote:
> Hi,
> I am going to power on my OEM server board with two Intel x86 CPUs. The 
> BMC chip is ASPEED 2500.
> 
> By the Intel data sheets, I just need to control a power on GPIO to 
> emulate power button behavior.
> The problems are, when I send Host State Control commands as mentioned 
> in docs/host-management.md, the journal log shows a lot of systemctl 
> errors.
> 
> Looks like it is going to start the OpenPower related host control 
> services, which only applies to PowerPC system.
> I try to modify GPIO_CONFIGS appears in skeleton recipe to match my 
> board, but I still got some other errors says pflash stuffs.

It sounds like you're building an OpenPOWER-based BMC image - this is controlled by how you set the TEMPLATECONF environment variable when sourcing the `openbmc-env` file to build (at a guess I'd say you're building for Palmetto, as it's used throughout the examples in the docs repo).

We do have support for a couple of x86 machines in the tree - your best bet is probably the Quanta 71L machine maintained by Patrick Venture:

https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/tree/master/meta-openbmc-machines/meta-x86/meta-quanta/meta-q71l

As an aside, if you're experimenting and switching between target machines, it's probably a good idea to blow away your build/conf directory to make sure things get set up correctly when you next set TEMPLATECONF and source openbmc-env.

> 
> Because there is no documents to tell me how to customize the openbmc to 
> fit on x86 CPUs, so I am not sure the GPIO_CONFIGS in skeleton is the 
> right way or not.

Yeah, there's not a wealth of documentation on bringing up a new machine. It would be great if you could document your experience once you get there :)

Hope that helps in some way,

Andrew

Re: How to power on Intel x86 based CPUs

[Brad Chou]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2604 bytes --]

Hi,
Actually I am using the meta-s2600wf as my TEMPLATECONF.
Now switch to Q71L but found some problems :

1. I can not send the same REST command to power up the host. It seems the xyz/openbmc_project/state/host0/attr/RequestedHostTransition 
is gone. I even can’t see any attributes related to xyz/openbmc_project/state.

2. I found in quanta-q71l.conf, it remove the obmc-host-state-mgmt, this may be needed when using REST to power on host. Why q71L remove it ?  Is it because of not compatible with x86 system ?

3. Suppose the REST is not used by Q71L, how can I power it up from LAN ?

Thanks.


> On Apr 10, 2018, at 21:36, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> 
> Hi Brad,
> 
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, at 19:35, Brad Chou wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am going to power on my OEM server board with two Intel x86 CPUs. The 
>> BMC chip is ASPEED 2500.
>> 
>> By the Intel data sheets, I just need to control a power on GPIO to 
>> emulate power button behavior.
>> The problems are, when I send Host State Control commands as mentioned 
>> in docs/host-management.md, the journal log shows a lot of systemctl 
>> errors.
>> 
>> Looks like it is going to start the OpenPower related host control 
>> services, which only applies to PowerPC system.
>> I try to modify GPIO_CONFIGS appears in skeleton recipe to match my 
>> board, but I still got some other errors says pflash stuffs.
> 
> It sounds like you're building an OpenPOWER-based BMC image - this is controlled by how you set the TEMPLATECONF environment variable when sourcing the `openbmc-env` file to build (at a guess I'd say you're building for Palmetto, as it's used throughout the examples in the docs repo).
> 
> We do have support for a couple of x86 machines in the tree - your best bet is probably the Quanta 71L machine maintained by Patrick Venture:
> 
> https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/tree/master/meta-openbmc-machines/meta-x86/meta-quanta/meta-q71l
> 
> As an aside, if you're experimenting and switching between target machines, it's probably a good idea to blow away your build/conf directory to make sure things get set up correctly when you next set TEMPLATECONF and source openbmc-env.
> 
>> 
>> Because there is no documents to tell me how to customize the openbmc to 
>> fit on x86 CPUs, so I am not sure the GPIO_CONFIGS in skeleton is the 
>> right way or not.
> 
> Yeah, there's not a wealth of documentation on bringing up a new machine. It would be great if you could document your experience once you get there :)
> 
> Hope that helps in some way,
> 
> Andrew


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5444 bytes --]

Re: How to power on Intel x86 based CPUs

[Nancy Yuen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2891 bytes --]

Patrick Venture uses the q71l and may be able to answer #2.  I suspect it
was removed simply b/c the system we were using it on didn't use it.

----------
Nancy

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 2:43 AM, Brad Chou <chou.brad@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> Actually I am using the meta-s2600wf as my TEMPLATECONF.
> Now switch to Q71L but found some problems :
>
> 1. I can not send the same REST command to power up the host. It seems the
> xyz/openbmc_project/state/host0/attr/RequestedHostTransition
> is gone. I even can’t see any attributes related to
> xyz/openbmc_project/state.
>
> 2. I found in quanta-q71l.conf, it remove the obmc-host-state-mgmt, this
> may be needed when using REST to power on host. Why q71L remove it ?  Is it
> because of not compatible with x86 system ?
>
> 3. Suppose the REST is not used by Q71L, how can I power it up from LAN ?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Apr 10, 2018, at 21:36, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Brad,
>
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, at 19:35, Brad Chou wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am going to power on my OEM server board with two Intel x86 CPUs. The
> BMC chip is ASPEED 2500.
>
> By the Intel data sheets, I just need to control a power on GPIO to
> emulate power button behavior.
> The problems are, when I send Host State Control commands as mentioned
> in docs/host-management.md, the journal log shows a lot of systemctl
> errors.
>
> Looks like it is going to start the OpenPower related host control
> services, which only applies to PowerPC system.
> I try to modify GPIO_CONFIGS appears in skeleton recipe to match my
> board, but I still got some other errors says pflash stuffs.
>
>
> It sounds like you're building an OpenPOWER-based BMC image - this is
> controlled by how you set the TEMPLATECONF environment variable when
> sourcing the `openbmc-env` file to build (at a guess I'd say you're
> building for Palmetto, as it's used throughout the examples in the docs
> repo).
>
> We do have support for a couple of x86 machines in the tree - your best
> bet is probably the Quanta 71L machine maintained by Patrick Venture:
>
> https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/tree/master/meta-
> openbmc-machines/meta-x86/meta-quanta/meta-q71l
>
> As an aside, if you're experimenting and switching between target
> machines, it's probably a good idea to blow away your build/conf directory
> to make sure things get set up correctly when you next set TEMPLATECONF and
> source openbmc-env.
>
>
> Because there is no documents to tell me how to customize the openbmc to
> fit on x86 CPUs, so I am not sure the GPIO_CONFIGS in skeleton is the
> right way or not.
>
>
> Yeah, there's not a wealth of documentation on bringing up a new machine.
> It would be great if you could document your experience once you get there
> :)
>
> Hope that helps in some way,
>
> Andrew
>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5044 bytes --]

Re: How to power on Intel x86 based CPUs

[Patrick Venture]

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Nancy Yuen <yuenn@google.com> wrote:
> Patrick Venture uses the q71l and may be able to answer #2.  I suspect it
> was removed simply b/c the system we were using it on didn't use it.
>
> ----------
> Nancy
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 2:43 AM, Brad Chou <chou.brad@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> Actually I am using the meta-s2600wf as my TEMPLATECONF.
>> Now switch to Q71L but found some problems :
>>
>> 1. I can not send the same REST command to power up the host. It seems the
>> xyz/openbmc_project/state/host0/attr/RequestedHostTransition
>> is gone. I even can’t see any attributes related to
>> xyz/openbmc_project/state.
>>
>> 2. I found in quanta-q71l.conf, it remove the obmc-host-state-mgmt, this
>> may be needed when using REST to power on host. Why q71L remove it ?  Is it
>> because of not compatible with x86 system ?

We didn't require it.  There was nothing wired up to it for us.  One
could conceivably wire up the power-on script stuff.

>>
>> 3. Suppose the REST is not used by Q71L, how can I power it up from LAN ?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> On Apr 10, 2018, at 21:36, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Brad,
>>
>> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, at 19:35, Brad Chou wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I am going to power on my OEM server board with two Intel x86 CPUs. The
>> BMC chip is ASPEED 2500.
>>
>> By the Intel data sheets, I just need to control a power on GPIO to
>> emulate power button behavior.
>> The problems are, when I send Host State Control commands as mentioned
>> in docs/host-management.md, the journal log shows a lot of systemctl
>> errors.
>>
>> Looks like it is going to start the OpenPower related host control
>> services, which only applies to PowerPC system.
>> I try to modify GPIO_CONFIGS appears in skeleton recipe to match my
>> board, but I still got some other errors says pflash stuffs.
>>
>>
>> It sounds like you're building an OpenPOWER-based BMC image - this is
>> controlled by how you set the TEMPLATECONF environment variable when
>> sourcing the `openbmc-env` file to build (at a guess I'd say you're building
>> for Palmetto, as it's used throughout the examples in the docs repo).
>>
>> We do have support for a couple of x86 machines in the tree - your best
>> bet is probably the Quanta 71L machine maintained by Patrick Venture:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/tree/master/meta-openbmc-machines/meta-x86/meta-quanta/meta-q71l
>>
>> As an aside, if you're experimenting and switching between target
>> machines, it's probably a good idea to blow away your build/conf directory
>> to make sure things get set up correctly when you next set TEMPLATECONF and
>> source openbmc-env.
>>
>>
>> Because there is no documents to tell me how to customize the openbmc to
>> fit on x86 CPUs, so I am not sure the GPIO_CONFIGS in skeleton is the
>> right way or not.
>>
>>
>> Yeah, there's not a wealth of documentation on bringing up a new machine.
>> It would be great if you could document your experience once you get there
>> :)
>>
>> Hope that helps in some way,
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>>
>

How to power on Intel x86 based CPUs

[Brad Chou]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 815 bytes --]

Hi,
I am going to power on my OEM server board with two Intel x86 CPUs. The BMC chip is ASPEED 2500.

By the Intel data sheets, I just need to control a power on GPIO to emulate power button behavior.
The problems are, when I send Host State Control commands as mentioned in docs/host-management.md, the journal log shows a lot of systemctl errors.

Looks like it is going to start the OpenPower related host control services, which only applies to PowerPC system.
I try to modify GPIO_CONFIGS appears in skeleton recipe to match my board, but I still got some other errors says pflash stuffs.

Because there is no documents to tell me how to customize the openbmc to fit on x86 CPUs, so I am not sure the GPIO_CONFIGS in skeleton is the right way or not.

Can somebody share your experience ?

Thanks.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1451 bytes --]