* off topic - hope somebody can help
@ 2004-06-11 1:27 Alexis
2004-06-11 2:13 ` Jason
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Alexis @ 2004-06-11 1:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Does anybody knows why ethernet interfaces stay's up even when i unplug the
ethernet cable?
I have 2 isp connected to a box, with a default route pointing both of them one
using a higer weight to use it as backup conection (using iproute2). Ok, if i
unplug the ethernet cable of eth of isp1 , the ethernet card stays up and nobody
can make any connection. But, if i "really" force the interface shutdown of
provider1 (doing ifdown eth1) the traffic goes instantly trough provider2.
Any idea how can i tear down an interface when i unplug the ethernet cable?
Thanks in advance.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: off topic - hope somebody can help
2004-06-11 1:27 off topic - hope somebody can help Alexis
@ 2004-06-11 2:13 ` Jason
2004-06-11 11:29 ` Antony Stone
2004-06-11 16:54 ` Damjan
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jason @ 2004-06-11 2:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexis; +Cc: netfilter
after you yank the cable, what happens if you run mii-tool ethX . Does it
say that the link is dead? If so, what I do is run mii-tool in monitor
mode and just look for a "link down" statement in syslog. When it arrives,
I down the interface with no cable. Not the most elegant, but it has
worked for me for some time now.
--
Jason
www.jasonandjessi.com
It gimme the jibblies
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Alexis wrote:
> Does anybody knows why ethernet interfaces stay's up even when i unplug the
> ethernet cable?
>
> I have 2 isp connected to a box, with a default route pointing both of them one
> using a higer weight to use it as backup conection (using iproute2). Ok, if i
> unplug the ethernet cable of eth of isp1 , the ethernet card stays up and nobody
> can make any connection. But, if i "really" force the interface shutdown of
> provider1 (doing ifdown eth1) the traffic goes instantly trough provider2.
>
> Any idea how can i tear down an interface when i unplug the ethernet cable?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: off topic - hope somebody can help
2004-06-11 1:27 off topic - hope somebody can help Alexis
2004-06-11 2:13 ` Jason
@ 2004-06-11 11:29 ` Antony Stone
2004-06-11 11:42 ` Gavin Hamill
2004-06-11 16:54 ` Damjan
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Antony Stone @ 2004-06-11 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
On Friday 11 June 2004 2:27 am, Alexis wrote:
> Does anybody knows why ethernet interfaces stay's up even when i unplug the
> ethernet cable?
Why shouldn't it? The interface is still fully functioning even if you
choose to disconnect it - I think plenty of people would get upset if the
interface went down on its own just because the cable got unplugged (or the
hub had a short power failure)...
> I have 2 isp connected to a box, with a default route pointing both of them
> one using a higer weight to use it as backup conection (using iproute2).
> Ok, if i unplug the ethernet cable of eth of isp1 , the ethernet card stays
> up and nobody can make any connection. But, if i "really" force the
> interface shutdown of provider1 (doing ifdown eth1) the traffic goes
> instantly trough provider2.
>
> Any idea how can i tear down an interface when i unplug the ethernet cable?
Personally I would prefer to do something like a ping test to each ISPs
gateway router - then you can switch routes if any part of the connection
between your box and the link to the Internet goes down, not just one
specific piece of CAT5 cable.
Regards,
Antony.
--
Documentation is like sex.
When it's good, it's very very good.
When it's bad, it's still better than nothing.
Please reply to the list;
please don't CC me.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: off topic - hope somebody can help
2004-06-11 11:29 ` Antony Stone
@ 2004-06-11 11:42 ` Gavin Hamill
2004-06-11 12:01 ` Antony Stone
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Gavin Hamill @ 2004-06-11 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
On Friday 11 June 2004 12:29, Antony Stone wrote:
> Why shouldn't it? The interface is still fully functioning even if you
> choose to disconnect it - I think plenty of people would get upset if the
> interface went down on its own just because the cable got unplugged (or the
> hub had a short power failure)...
This is definately one of the biggest no-brain decisions Microsoft made with
Windows 2000 - as soon as the link on an Ethernet adapter disappears, all
open TCP sessions from the workstation are immediately reset.
Multiply that by power-cycling a 48-port switch, and you have a headache :/
gdh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: off topic - hope somebody can help
2004-06-11 11:42 ` Gavin Hamill
@ 2004-06-11 12:01 ` Antony Stone
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Antony Stone @ 2004-06-11 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
On Friday 11 June 2004 12:42 pm, Gavin Hamill wrote:
> On Friday 11 June 2004 12:29, Antony Stone wrote:
> > Why shouldn't it? The interface is still fully functioning even if you
> > choose to disconnect it - I think plenty of people would get upset if the
> > interface went down on its own just because the cable got unplugged (or
> > the hub had a short power failure)...
>
> This is definately one of the biggest no-brain decisions Microsoft made
> with Windows 2000 - as soon as the link on an Ethernet adapter disappears,
> all open TCP sessions from the workstation are immediately reset.
>
> Multiply that by power-cycling a 48-port switch, and you have a headache :/
Sheesh - I did not know that - I wrote what I did above on the basis that this
would be such a stupid and inconvenient thing to do that of course nobody
would implement it as a standard "feature".
Glad to know that no matter how hard I try, Microsoft still manages to exceed
my expectations of their inept design concepts.
Antony.
--
I think, therefore I am.
I'm pink, therefore I'm Spam.
I drink, therefore I think I am.
Please reply to the list;
please don't CC me.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: off topic - hope somebody can help
@ 2004-06-11 15:47 Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 CS/SCBN
2004-06-11 18:04 ` Alexis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 CS/SCBN @ 2004-06-11 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'netfilter@lists.netfilter.org'
i think cisco's 'show interface' commands are a model of what s/be
displayed.
these displays delinate between the functionality of the physical interface
and
the protocol that should operating on them.
~piranha@usaf
-----Original Message-----
From: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
[mailto:netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org]On Behalf Of Antony Stone
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 5:01 AM
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: off topic - hope somebody can help
On Friday 11 June 2004 12:42 pm, Gavin Hamill wrote:
> On Friday 11 June 2004 12:29, Antony Stone wrote:
> > Why shouldn't it? The interface is still fully functioning even if you
> > choose to disconnect it - I think plenty of people would get upset if
the
> > interface went down on its own just because the cable got unplugged (or
> > the hub had a short power failure)...
>
> This is definately one of the biggest no-brain decisions Microsoft made
> with Windows 2000 - as soon as the link on an Ethernet adapter disappears,
> all open TCP sessions from the workstation are immediately reset.
>
> Multiply that by power-cycling a 48-port switch, and you have a headache
:/
Sheesh - I did not know that - I wrote what I did above on the basis that
this
would be such a stupid and inconvenient thing to do that of course nobody
would implement it as a standard "feature".
Glad to know that no matter how hard I try, Microsoft still manages to
exceed
my expectations of their inept design concepts.
Antony.
--
I think, therefore I am.
I'm pink, therefore I'm Spam.
I drink, therefore I think I am.
Please reply to the
list;
please don't CC
me.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: off topic - hope somebody can help
2004-06-11 1:27 off topic - hope somebody can help Alexis
2004-06-11 2:13 ` Jason
2004-06-11 11:29 ` Antony Stone
@ 2004-06-11 16:54 ` Damjan
2004-06-11 19:58 ` Alexis
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Damjan @ 2004-06-11 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter; +Cc: Alexis
> Does anybody knows why ethernet interfaces stay's up even when i unplug the
> ethernet cable?
>
> I have 2 isp connected to a box, with a default route pointing both of them one
> using a higer weight to use it as backup conection (using iproute2). Ok, if i
> unplug the ethernet cable of eth of isp1 , the ethernet card stays up and nobody
> can make any connection. But, if i "really" force the interface shutdown of
> provider1 (doing ifdown eth1) the traffic goes instantly trough provider2.
>
> Any idea how can i tear down an interface when i unplug the ethernet cable?
you can use netplugd, look it up on freshemat.net.
--
damjan | дамјан
This is my jabber ID --> damjan@bagra.net.mk <-- not my mail address!!!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: off topic - hope somebody can help
2004-06-11 15:47 Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 CS/SCBN
@ 2004-06-11 18:04 ` Alexis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Alexis @ 2004-06-11 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Lets see, Im aware that "shut" an interface when I unplug the network cable
is a stupid thing to do. But im not asking about this.
Im asking about to "tear down" the protocol of the interface, so I can loose
all the routes of this link and the traffic switch directly to second isp.
I don’t care really if I unplug the cable the Ethernet card remains up, I
need the routes disappear in order to switch to the other isp.
I has nothing to deal with Microsoft, linux or whatever.
Like this mail say, when you make a show int in cisco routers there's a link
state and a protocol state. If protocol goes down (one reason could be
unplug the cable) the routes are lost.
This is what I need, and additional to this, some distributions shows in the
console a link notice and some don’t, I assume this is related to the nic
driver.
-----Mensaje original-----
De: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
[mailto:netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org] En nombre de Hudson Delbert J
Contr 61 CS/SCBN
Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Junio de 2004 12:48
Para: 'netfilter@lists.netfilter.org'
Asunto: RE: off topic - hope somebody can help
i think cisco's 'show interface' commands are a model of what s/be
displayed.
these displays delinate between the functionality of the physical interface
and
the protocol that should operating on them.
~piranha@usaf
-----Original Message-----
From: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
[mailto:netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org]On Behalf Of Antony Stone
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 5:01 AM
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: off topic - hope somebody can help
On Friday 11 June 2004 12:42 pm, Gavin Hamill wrote:
> On Friday 11 June 2004 12:29, Antony Stone wrote:
> > Why shouldn't it? The interface is still fully functioning even if you
> > choose to disconnect it - I think plenty of people would get upset if
the
> > interface went down on its own just because the cable got unplugged (or
> > the hub had a short power failure)...
>
> This is definately one of the biggest no-brain decisions Microsoft made
> with Windows 2000 - as soon as the link on an Ethernet adapter disappears,
> all open TCP sessions from the workstation are immediately reset.
>
> Multiply that by power-cycling a 48-port switch, and you have a headache
:/
Sheesh - I did not know that - I wrote what I did above on the basis that
this
would be such a stupid and inconvenient thing to do that of course nobody
would implement it as a standard "feature".
Glad to know that no matter how hard I try, Microsoft still manages to
exceed
my expectations of their inept design concepts.
Antony.
--
I think, therefore I am.
I'm pink, therefore I'm Spam.
I drink, therefore I think I am.
Please reply to the
list;
please don't CC
me.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: off topic - hope somebody can help
2004-06-11 16:54 ` Damjan
@ 2004-06-11 19:58 ` Alexis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Alexis @ 2004-06-11 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
It could help
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Damjan [mailto:gdamjan@mail.net.mk]
Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Junio de 2004 13:55
Para: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
CC: Alexis
Asunto: Re: off topic - hope somebody can help
> Does anybody knows why ethernet interfaces stay's up even when i unplug
the
> ethernet cable?
>
> I have 2 isp connected to a box, with a default route pointing both of
them one
> using a higer weight to use it as backup conection (using iproute2). Ok,
if i
> unplug the ethernet cable of eth of isp1 , the ethernet card stays up and
nobody
> can make any connection. But, if i "really" force the interface shutdown
of
> provider1 (doing ifdown eth1) the traffic goes instantly trough provider2.
>
> Any idea how can i tear down an interface when i unplug the ethernet
cable?
you can use netplugd, look it up on freshemat.net.
--
damjan | ??????
This is my jabber ID --> damjan@bagra.net.mk <-- not my mail address!!!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-06-11 19:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-06-11 1:27 off topic - hope somebody can help Alexis
2004-06-11 2:13 ` Jason
2004-06-11 11:29 ` Antony Stone
2004-06-11 11:42 ` Gavin Hamill
2004-06-11 12:01 ` Antony Stone
2004-06-11 16:54 ` Damjan
2004-06-11 19:58 ` Alexis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-11 15:47 Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 CS/SCBN
2004-06-11 18:04 ` Alexis
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.