From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham-oKK1aGe2n869koe0gwxAeg@public.gmane.org>
To: 'Lyle Seaman' <lws-RAHWjsxJnJUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
'Herbert Nachtnebel'
<Herbert.Nachtnebel-8zxNtbQCHXIjuwv8T7myQQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: RE: AW: Re: [PATCH] S4bios for 2.5.52.
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:12:20 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000b01c2a79a$f13045b0$0101010a@NigelLaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021219150600.C5DBE1480A-RAHWjsxJnJUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Hmm. I didn't think that carefully about what was causing the write to
occur. Hence I unrolled I took your patch further and completely separated
the submitting of _all_ of the pages from the block_flushpage calls for all
of the pages (ie two loops). (I saw much more than a one second gain, even
on my faster desktop computer!) After reading this, I think I should look
sooner at what is going. I was going to anyway, but I was concentrating on
getting my whole port from 2.4 working first.
I'm not promising anything quickly - I have plenty of 'real' work at the
moment :>
Regards,
Nigel
> Still, writing pages synchronously, one at a time, is going
> to be slow no
> matter what you do. *Especially* on slow laptop drives.
>
> What I sent Nigel was a little patch to write them 20 at a
> time, which reduced
> my suspend times from nearly 60 seconds to something around 2
> seconds. I
> stopped at 20 because going beyond that was chasing
> diminishing returns and I
> didn't think that chewing up a huge chunk of stack was
> justified for a
> one-second reduction in suspend times.
>
> I didn't send it on to the rest of the list because I figure
> Nigel's other
> changes will be coming along as well, and I didn't want to
> make merging too
> difficult for everyone.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Geek Gift Procrastinating?
Get the perfect geek gift now! Before the Holidays pass you by.
T H I N K G E E K . C O M http://www.thinkgeek.com/sf/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-19 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Herbert.Nachtnebel@tuwien.ac.at>
[not found] ` <B900970C7DD9474C972986EB3EC7C58F0D404E-PWLG29+z7hEKeIAE67mlpo2P0GrZ+RbP@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-19 15:05 ` AW: Re: [PATCH] S4bios for 2.5.52 Lyle Seaman
[not found] ` <20021219150600.C5DBE1480A-RAHWjsxJnJUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-19 20:12 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2002-12-19 20:04 ` Nigel Cunningham
2002-12-19 9:49 AW: " Herbert Nachtnebel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000b01c2a79a$f13045b0$0101010a@NigelLaptop' \
--to=ncunningham-okk1age2n869koe0gwxaeg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Herbert.Nachtnebel-8zxNtbQCHXIjuwv8T7myQQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lws-RAHWjsxJnJUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.