From: Lyle Seaman <lws-RAHWjsxJnJUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Herbert Nachtnebel
<Herbert.Nachtnebel-8zxNtbQCHXIjuwv8T7myQQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: AW: Re: [PATCH] S4bios for 2.5.52.
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:05:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021219150600.C5DBE1480A@o-o.yi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from "Herbert Nachtnebel" <Herbert.Nachtnebel-8zxNtbQCHXIjuwv8T7myQQ@public.gmane.org> of "Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:49:06 +0100." <B900970C7DD9474C972986EB3EC7C58F0D404E-PWLG29+z7hEKeIAE67mlpo2P0GrZ+RbP@public.gmane.org>
> but that sounds like a unpluged block queue which get flushed every 5 seconds (or 30 seconds) by the bdflush daemon. There are two things which counters this, 1st: swsusp works on ide and there aren't such problems since aeons and 2nd Pavel knows that :-)
> Hence, apologies for this hip shot.
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying, Herbert.
There was something broken in yield() or schedule() back around 2.5.20 -
2.5.40 that made rw_swap_page_sync EXCRUTIATINGLY slow, but that's been fixed.
Still, writing pages synchronously, one at a time, is going to be slow no
matter what you do. *Especially* on slow laptop drives.
What I sent Nigel was a little patch to write them 20 at a time, which reduced
my suspend times from nearly 60 seconds to something around 2 seconds. I
stopped at 20 because going beyond that was chasing diminishing returns and I
didn't think that chewing up a huge chunk of stack was justified for a
one-second reduction in suspend times.
I didn't send it on to the rest of the list because I figure Nigel's other
changes will be coming along as well, and I didn't want to make merging too
difficult for everyone.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Geek Gift Procrastinating?
Get the perfect geek gift now! Before the Holidays pass you by.
T H I N K G E E K . C O M http://www.thinkgeek.com/sf/
next parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-19 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Herbert.Nachtnebel@tuwien.ac.at>
[not found] ` <B900970C7DD9474C972986EB3EC7C58F0D404E-PWLG29+z7hEKeIAE67mlpo2P0GrZ+RbP@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-19 15:05 ` Lyle Seaman [this message]
[not found] ` <20021219150600.C5DBE1480A-RAHWjsxJnJUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-19 20:12 ` AW: Re: [PATCH] S4bios for 2.5.52 Nigel Cunningham
2002-12-19 20:04 ` Nigel Cunningham
2002-12-19 9:49 AW: " Herbert Nachtnebel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021219150600.C5DBE1480A@o-o.yi.org \
--to=lws-rahwjsxjnjudnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Herbert.Nachtnebel-8zxNtbQCHXIjuwv8T7myQQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.