RE: A 'Statement of Assurance' on SELinux patents

["Ed Street" <blacknet@simplyaquatics.com>]

Hello,

So basically SCC is telling us they don't care what we do with Selinux
as long as they do not have a product that would be considered
'competitive' I do believe that this is discussed under the Sherman act
and in the constitution :)

So tell me what is prohibiting SCC from taking OUR additional work on
Selinux and making a competitive product and using this 'agreement' to
state that we/I can no longer use it.

I have discussed this topic with some lawyer friends of mine and they
said it stinks, full of holes and does violate several laws in the
United States.

In the end I do have the impression that SCC is in a financial crunch
and looking for $ anywhere they can grab it.  Now to pull SCC's
financial reports.

Ed


--
You have received this message because you are subscribed to the selinux list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.