From: "Sricharan" <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
To: 'Rajendra Nayak' <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
'Stephen Boyd' <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] clk: qcom: Set BRANCH_HALT_DELAY flags for venus core0/1 clks
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 08:58:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001701d23b02$7bf7daa0$73e78fe0$@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5823DC3E.2060106@codeaurora.org>
Hi Rajendra,
>
>>>
>>> The proper sequence sounds like it should be:
>>>
>>> 1. Enable GDSC for main domain
>>> 2. Enable clocks for main domain (video_{core,maxi,ahb,axi}_clk)
>>> 3. Write the two registers to assert hw signal for subdomains
>>> 4. Enable GDSCs for two subdomains
>>> 5. Enable clocks for subdomains (video_subcore{0,1}_clk)
>>>
>[]..
>
>>
>> So the above is the sequence which is actually carried out on the
>> firmware side. The same can be done in host as well.
>
>By the 'above sequence is done on firmware side', I hope you don;t mean *all* 5 steps.
>I guess you mean only step 3 is done by firmware?
>
Yes, only step 3.
Regards,
Sricharan
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Sricharan" <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
To: "'Rajendra Nayak'" <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
"'Stephen Boyd'" <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: <mturquette@baylibre.com>, <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] clk: qcom: Set BRANCH_HALT_DELAY flags for venus core0/1 clks
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 08:58:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001701d23b02$7bf7daa0$73e78fe0$@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5823DC3E.2060106@codeaurora.org>
Hi Rajendra,
>
>>>
>>> The proper sequence sounds like it should be:
>>>
>>> 1. Enable GDSC for main domain
>>> 2. Enable clocks for main domain (video_{core,maxi,ahb,axi}_clk)
>>> 3. Write the two registers to assert hw signal for subdomains
>>> 4. Enable GDSCs for two subdomains
>>> 5. Enable clocks for subdomains (video_subcore{0,1}_clk)
>>>
>[]..
>
>>
>> So the above is the sequence which is actually carried out on the
>> firmware side. The same can be done in host as well.
>
>By the 'above sequence is done on firmware side', I hope you don;t mean *all* 5 steps.
>I guess you mean only step 3 is done by firmware?
>
Yes, only step 3.
Regards,
Sricharan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-10 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-24 10:18 [PATCH 0/3] clk: qcom: Add support for hw controlled gdscs/clocks Sricharan R
2016-10-24 10:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] clk: qcom: gdsc: Add support for gdscs with HW control Sricharan R
2016-10-25 13:01 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2016-10-26 4:12 ` Sricharan
2016-10-26 4:12 ` Sricharan
2016-11-02 0:18 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-11-02 6:50 ` Sricharan
2016-11-02 6:50 ` Sricharan
2016-11-02 6:53 ` Sricharan
2016-11-02 6:53 ` Sricharan
2016-11-02 17:59 ` 'Stephen Boyd'
2016-11-03 13:30 ` Sricharan
2016-11-03 13:30 ` Sricharan
2016-11-03 20:05 ` 'Stephen Boyd'
2016-10-24 10:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] clk: qcom: Put venus core0/1 gdscs to hw control mode Sricharan R
2016-10-24 10:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] clk: qcom: Set BRANCH_HALT_DELAY flags for venus core0/1 clks Sricharan R
2016-11-03 20:34 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-11-04 9:09 ` Sricharan
2016-11-04 9:09 ` Sricharan
2016-11-04 20:18 ` 'Stephen Boyd'
2016-11-07 5:48 ` Rajendra Nayak
2016-11-08 22:33 ` 'Stephen Boyd'
2016-11-09 16:56 ` Sricharan
2016-11-09 16:56 ` Sricharan
2016-11-10 2:32 ` Rajendra Nayak
2016-11-10 3:28 ` Sricharan [this message]
2016-11-10 3:28 ` Sricharan
2016-11-10 23:30 ` 'Stephen Boyd'
2016-11-14 3:51 ` Sricharan
2016-11-14 3:51 ` Sricharan
2016-12-12 15:40 ` Stanimir Varbanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001701d23b02$7bf7daa0$73e78fe0$@codeaurora.org' \
--to=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.