All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
To: 'Brian Foster' <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: 'Dave Chinner' <david@fromorbit.com>,
	'Theodore Ts'o' <tytso@mit.edu>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	'linux-ext4' <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com, 'Ashish Sangwan' <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 11/11] xfstests: fsx: Add fallocate insert range operation
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 14:48:57 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <001901d02a3d$a10cd9d0$e3268d70$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150106181323.GI5874@bfoster.bfoster>

> >  		}
> >  		break;
> > +	case OP_INSERT_RANGE:
> > +		if (!insert_range_calls) {
> > +			log4(OP_SKIPPED, OP_INSERT_RANGE, offset, size);
> > +			goto out;
> > +		}
> > +		break;
> >  	}
> >
> >  	switch (op) {
> > @@ -1244,6 +1313,21 @@ test(void)
> >  		}
> >  		do_collapse_range(offset, size);
> >  		break;
> > +	case OP_INSERT_RANGE:
> > +		TRIM_OFF_LEN(offset, size, (maxfilelen - 1) - file_size);
> 
> I see a ton of "skipping insert beyond EOF" messages when I run fsx with
> this patch that boil down to that we trim against the max allowable file
> size increase rather than the current file size. I suspect the intent
> here is to not limit the insert length based on the file size. That
> makes sense, but that causes us to fail to mod the insert offset against
> the file size and thus generate a ton more noise.
> 
> Could we either open code the trim to handle the offset/len correctly or
> break up the macro in a way that facilitates doing so? For example, a
> quick solution might be to create TRIM_OFF() and TRIM_LEN() based on the
> associated code in TRIM_OFF_LEN(), redefine TRIM_OFF_LEN() to use the
> new macros, and then the insert range code could do something like:
> 
> 	TRIM_OFF(offset, file_size - 1);
> 	TRIM_LEN(offset, size, maxfilelen - file_size);
> 	...
> 
Okay, I will change it as your suggestion.

> Brian
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
To: 'Brian Foster' <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: 'Theodore Ts'o' <tytso@mit.edu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
	'Ashish Sangwan' <a.sangwan@samsung.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	'linux-ext4' <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 11/11] xfstests: fsx: Add fallocate insert range operation
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 14:48:57 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <001901d02a3d$a10cd9d0$e3268d70$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150106181323.GI5874@bfoster.bfoster>

> >  		}
> >  		break;
> > +	case OP_INSERT_RANGE:
> > +		if (!insert_range_calls) {
> > +			log4(OP_SKIPPED, OP_INSERT_RANGE, offset, size);
> > +			goto out;
> > +		}
> > +		break;
> >  	}
> >
> >  	switch (op) {
> > @@ -1244,6 +1313,21 @@ test(void)
> >  		}
> >  		do_collapse_range(offset, size);
> >  		break;
> > +	case OP_INSERT_RANGE:
> > +		TRIM_OFF_LEN(offset, size, (maxfilelen - 1) - file_size);
> 
> I see a ton of "skipping insert beyond EOF" messages when I run fsx with
> this patch that boil down to that we trim against the max allowable file
> size increase rather than the current file size. I suspect the intent
> here is to not limit the insert length based on the file size. That
> makes sense, but that causes us to fail to mod the insert offset against
> the file size and thus generate a ton more noise.
> 
> Could we either open code the trim to handle the offset/len correctly or
> break up the macro in a way that facilitates doing so? For example, a
> quick solution might be to create TRIM_OFF() and TRIM_LEN() based on the
> associated code in TRIM_OFF_LEN(), redefine TRIM_OFF_LEN() to use the
> new macros, and then the insert range code could do something like:
> 
> 	TRIM_OFF(offset, file_size - 1);
> 	TRIM_LEN(offset, size, maxfilelen - file_size);
> 	...
> 
Okay, I will change it as your suggestion.

> Brian
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-07  5:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-02  9:43 [PATCH v7 11/11] xfstests: fsx: Add fallocate insert range operation Namjae Jeon
2015-01-02  9:43 ` Namjae Jeon
2015-01-06 18:13 ` Brian Foster
2015-01-06 18:13   ` Brian Foster
2015-01-07  5:48   ` Namjae Jeon [this message]
2015-01-07  5:48     ` Namjae Jeon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='001901d02a3d$a10cd9d0$e3268d70$@samsung.com' \
    --to=namjae.jeon@samsung.com \
    --cc=a.sangwan@samsung.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.