From: "Venkat Yekkirala" <vyekkirala@TrustedCS.com>
To: "'James Morris'" <jmorris@namei.org>, "Paul Moore" <paul.moore@hp.com>
Cc: <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>,
"'Christopher J. PeBenito'" <cpebenito@tresys.com>,
"'Karl MacMillan'" <kmacmillan@mentalrootkit.com>,
"Joshua Brindle" <jbrindle@tresys.com>
Subject: RE: Denials from newest kernel
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 15:10:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001b01c6efcc$c41f4bb0$cc0a010a@tcssec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610140332010.13740@d.namei>
> Yep, this may be the best way forward.
Not really so. Please see my response to Paul.
The best step forward really would be to let naming catchup
with the semantics.
I have the following specific proposals in this regard:
1. Use "secpoint" or a close relative for the module name.
I know you won't have none of it. Is it because there's
another LSM that might use it with the original semantics?
If so, should we then have a new "secpoint" module? I ask
because Chris PeBenito was the latest victim of the confusion
arising from here.
2. Leave the "packet" class with the recv perm, but place the
"relabelto", "flow_in" and "flow_out" perms in a new secpoint class.
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-14 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-10 14:42 Denials from newest kernel Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-10 18:33 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2006-10-10 19:15 ` Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-10 19:35 ` Karl MacMillan
2006-10-10 19:56 ` Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-12 18:51 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2006-10-12 20:06 ` Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-13 15:06 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2006-10-13 21:52 ` Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-16 12:31 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2006-10-16 13:45 ` Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-16 13:53 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2006-10-16 14:16 ` Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-16 17:26 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2006-10-16 18:29 ` Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-16 18:53 ` Paul Moore
2006-10-17 13:56 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2006-10-17 17:58 ` Darrel Goeddel
2006-10-17 18:22 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2006-10-17 19:23 ` Darrel Goeddel
2006-10-18 13:45 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2006-10-19 15:57 ` Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-20 12:41 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2006-10-23 17:42 ` Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-24 0:44 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2006-10-13 22:42 ` Paul Moore
2006-10-14 1:00 ` Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-14 12:13 ` Paul Moore
2006-10-14 19:50 ` Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-14 20:41 ` Paul Moore
2006-10-14 20:58 ` James Morris
2006-10-14 23:01 ` Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-16 13:16 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2006-10-16 14:11 ` Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-14 7:36 ` James Morris
2006-10-14 12:18 ` Paul Moore
2006-10-14 20:10 ` Venkat Yekkirala [this message]
2006-10-10 20:05 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2006-10-11 14:04 ` Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-12 7:19 ` James Morris
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-10 16:28 Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-10 15:45 Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-10 14:18 Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-10 14:42 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2006-10-09 23:40 Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-10 0:10 ` Joshua Brindle
2006-10-10 14:07 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2006-10-10 15:55 ` Joshua Brindle
2006-10-06 21:34 Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-06 21:17 Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-09 14:03 ` Joshua Brindle
2006-10-06 21:15 Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-06 21:31 ` Paul Moore
2006-10-06 20:05 Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-06 19:43 Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-06 15:11 Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-06 15:17 ` Joshua Brindle
2006-10-06 16:25 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-06 15:21 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-06 15:44 ` Joshua Brindle
2006-10-06 15:56 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-06 16:59 ` Karl MacMillan
2006-10-06 18:31 ` Joshua Brindle
2006-10-06 19:04 ` Joshua Brindle
2006-10-06 14:23 Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-06 14:50 ` Joshua Brindle
2006-10-06 13:45 Venkat Yekkirala
2006-10-06 13:55 ` Joshua Brindle
2006-10-06 14:39 ` Paul Moore
2006-10-06 13:31 Joshua Brindle
2006-10-06 17:32 ` James Morris
2006-10-06 18:41 ` Steve G
2006-10-06 19:50 ` James Morris
2006-10-06 19:56 ` Joshua Brindle
2006-10-06 20:13 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2006-10-06 19:02 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001b01c6efcc$c41f4bb0$cc0a010a@tcssec.com' \
--to=vyekkirala@trustedcs.com \
--cc=cpebenito@tresys.com \
--cc=jbrindle@tresys.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kmacmillan@mentalrootkit.com \
--cc=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.