From: Fan Li <fanofcode.li@samsung.com>
To: jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH V2] f2fs: change the method of calculating the number summary blocks
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:21:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002701ced480$0ab1cd10$20156730$@samsung.com> (raw)
npages_for_summary_flush uses (SUMMARY_SIZE + 1) as the size of a
f2fs_summary
while its actual size is SUMMARY_SIZE. So the result sometimes is bigger
than actual
number by one, which causes checkpoint can't be written into disk
contiguously,
and sometimes summary blocks can't be compacted like they should.
Besides, when writing summary blocks into pages, if remain space in a page
isn't
big enough for one f2fs_summary, it will be left unused, current code seems
not to
take it into account.
Signed-off-by: Fan Li <fanofcode.li@samsung.com>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 14 ++++++--------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c index 487af61..e40cdc4
100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -279,9 +279,8 @@ static void __add_sum_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
int type,
*/
int npages_for_summary_flush(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) {
- int total_size_bytes = 0;
int valid_sum_count = 0;
- int i, sum_space;
+ int i, sum_in_page;
for (i = CURSEG_HOT_DATA; i <= CURSEG_COLD_DATA; i++) {
if (sbi->ckpt->alloc_type[i] == SSR)
@@ -290,13 +289,12 @@ int npages_for_summary_flush(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
valid_sum_count += curseg_blkoff(sbi, i);
}
- total_size_bytes = valid_sum_count * (SUMMARY_SIZE + 1)
- + sizeof(struct nat_journal) + 2
- + sizeof(struct sit_journal) + 2;
- sum_space = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - SUM_FOOTER_SIZE;
- if (total_size_bytes < sum_space)
+ sum_in_page = (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 2 * SUM_JOURNAL_SIZE -
+ SUM_FOOTER_SIZE) / SUMMARY_SIZE;
+ if (valid_sum_count <= sum_in_page)
return 1;
- else if (total_size_bytes < 2 * sum_space)
+ else if ((valid_sum_count - sum_in_page) <=
+ (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - SUM_FOOTER_SIZE) / SUMMARY_SIZE)
return 2;
return 3;
}
--
1.7.9.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that
developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white
paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep
Android apps secure.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Fan Li <fanofcode.li@samsung.com>
To: jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH V2] f2fs: change the method of calculating the number summary blocks
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:21:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002701ced480$0ab1cd10$20156730$@samsung.com> (raw)
npages_for_summary_flush uses (SUMMARY_SIZE + 1) as the size of a
f2fs_summary
while its actual size is SUMMARY_SIZE. So the result sometimes is bigger
than actual
number by one, which causes checkpoint can't be written into disk
contiguously,
and sometimes summary blocks can't be compacted like they should.
Besides, when writing summary blocks into pages, if remain space in a page
isn't
big enough for one f2fs_summary, it will be left unused, current code seems
not to
take it into account.
Signed-off-by: Fan Li <fanofcode.li@samsung.com>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 14 ++++++--------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c index 487af61..e40cdc4
100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -279,9 +279,8 @@ static void __add_sum_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
int type,
*/
int npages_for_summary_flush(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) {
- int total_size_bytes = 0;
int valid_sum_count = 0;
- int i, sum_space;
+ int i, sum_in_page;
for (i = CURSEG_HOT_DATA; i <= CURSEG_COLD_DATA; i++) {
if (sbi->ckpt->alloc_type[i] == SSR)
@@ -290,13 +289,12 @@ int npages_for_summary_flush(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
valid_sum_count += curseg_blkoff(sbi, i);
}
- total_size_bytes = valid_sum_count * (SUMMARY_SIZE + 1)
- + sizeof(struct nat_journal) + 2
- + sizeof(struct sit_journal) + 2;
- sum_space = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - SUM_FOOTER_SIZE;
- if (total_size_bytes < sum_space)
+ sum_in_page = (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 2 * SUM_JOURNAL_SIZE -
+ SUM_FOOTER_SIZE) / SUMMARY_SIZE;
+ if (valid_sum_count <= sum_in_page)
return 1;
- else if (total_size_bytes < 2 * sum_space)
+ else if ((valid_sum_count - sum_in_page) <=
+ (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - SUM_FOOTER_SIZE) / SUMMARY_SIZE)
return 2;
return 3;
}
--
1.7.9.5
next reply other threads:[~2013-10-29 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-29 8:21 Fan Li [this message]
2013-10-29 8:21 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH V2] f2fs: change the method of calculating the number summary blocks Fan Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002701ced480$0ab1cd10$20156730$@samsung.com' \
--to=fanofcode.li@samsung.com \
--cc=jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.