All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andrew Theurer" <habanero@us.ibm.com>
To: <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>, "Hirokazu Takahashi" <taka@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>, <davem@redhat.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS for 2.5.36
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:12:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <004d01c276bb$39b32980$2a060e09@beavis> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20021018.161952.41628057.taka@valinux.co.jp

> >      > Congestion avoidance mechanism of NFS clients might cause this
> >      > situation.  I think the congestion window size is not enough
> >      > for high end machines.  You can make the window be larger as a
> >      > test.
> >
> > The congestion avoidance window is supposed to adapt to the bandwidth
> > that is available. Turn congestion avoidance off if you like, but my
> > experience is that doing so tends to seriously degrade performance as
> > the number of timeouts + resends skyrockets.
>
> Yes, you must be right.
>
> But I guess Andrew may use a great machine so that the transfer rate
> has exeeded the maximum size of the congestion avoidance window.
> Can we determin preferable maximum window size dynamically?

Is this a concern on the client only?  I can run a test with just one client
and see if I can saturate the 100Mbit adapter.  If I can, would we need to
make any adjustments then?  FYI, at 115 MB/sec total throughput, that's only
2.875 MB/sec for each of the 40 clients.  For the TCP result of 181 MB/sec,
that's 4.525 MB/sec, IMO, both of which are comfortable throughputs for a
100Mbit client.

Andrew Theurer



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Andrew Theurer" <habanero@us.ibm.com>
To: <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>, "Hirokazu Takahashi" <taka@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>, <davem@redhat.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [NFS] Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS for 2.5.36
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:12:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <004d01c276bb$39b32980$2a060e09@beavis> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20021018.161952.41628057.taka@valinux.co.jp

> >      > Congestion avoidance mechanism of NFS clients might cause this
> >      > situation.  I think the congestion window size is not enough
> >      > for high end machines.  You can make the window be larger as a
> >      > test.
> >
> > The congestion avoidance window is supposed to adapt to the bandwidth
> > that is available. Turn congestion avoidance off if you like, but my
> > experience is that doing so tends to seriously degrade performance as
> > the number of timeouts + resends skyrockets.
>
> Yes, you must be right.
>
> But I guess Andrew may use a great machine so that the transfer rate
> has exeeded the maximum size of the congestion avoidance window.
> Can we determin preferable maximum window size dynamically?

Is this a concern on the client only?  I can run a test with just one client
and see if I can saturate the 100Mbit adapter.  If I can, would we need to
make any adjustments then?  FYI, at 115 MB/sec total throughput, that's only
2.875 MB/sec for each of the 40 clients.  For the TCP result of 181 MB/sec,
that's 4.525 MB/sec, IMO, both of which are comfortable throughputs for a
100Mbit client.

Andrew Theurer


  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-18 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-18  8:14 [PATCH] zerocopy NFS for 2.5.36 Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-09-18 23:00 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-18 23:54   ` Alan Cox
2002-09-18 23:54     ` Alan Cox
2002-09-19  0:16     ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-19  2:13       ` Aaron Lehmann
2002-09-19  3:30         ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-19  3:30           ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-19 10:42           ` Alan Cox
2002-09-19 10:42             ` Alan Cox
2002-09-19 13:15       ` [NFS] " Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-09-19 20:42         ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-19 21:12           ` David S. Miller
2002-09-19 21:12             ` [NFS] " David S. Miller
2002-09-21 11:56   ` Pavel Machek
2002-09-21 11:56     ` Pavel Machek
2002-10-14  5:50 ` Neil Brown
2002-10-14  6:15   ` David S. Miller
2002-10-14 10:45     ` kuznet
2002-10-14 10:48       ` David S. Miller
2002-10-14 12:01   ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-14 14:12     ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-16  3:44     ` Neil Brown
2002-10-16  4:31       ` David S. Miller
2002-10-16 15:04         ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-17  2:03         ` [NFS] " Andrew Theurer
2002-10-17  2:31           ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-17 13:16             ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-17 13:16               ` [NFS] " Andrew Theurer
2002-10-17 13:26               ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-17 13:26                 ` [NFS] " Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-17 14:10                 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-17 16:26                   ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-17 16:26                     ` [NFS] " Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-18  5:38                     ` Trond Myklebust
2002-10-18  7:19                       ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-18 15:12                         ` Andrew Theurer [this message]
2002-10-18 15:12                           ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-19 20:34                           ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-19 20:34                             ` [NFS] " Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-22 21:16                             ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-22 21:16                               ` [NFS] " Andrew Theurer
2002-10-23  9:29                               ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-24 15:32                                 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-27 11:10                                   ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-16 11:09       ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-16 17:02         ` kaza
2002-10-17  4:36           ` rddunlap
2002-10-18 13:11   ` [PATCH] zerocopy NFS for 2.5.43 Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-23  1:18     ` Neil Brown
2002-10-23  3:53       ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-23  5:40         ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-23  6:03           ` Neil Brown
2002-10-23 22:35             ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-23  6:10         ` Neil Brown
2002-10-23  7:08           ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-23 15:23           ` Trond Myklebust
2002-10-23 21:50       ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-23 23:55         ` Trond Myklebust
2002-10-24  1:33           ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-27 10:39             ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-28 16:31               ` Trond Myklebust
2002-10-28 23:39                 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-29  6:36                 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-29 15:09                   ` Trond Myklebust
2002-10-29 16:27                     ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-29 16:49                       ` Trond Myklebust
2002-10-30  3:18                     ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-25  9:52       ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-25 12:41         ` Neil Brown
2002-10-26  3:11           ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-26  3:46             ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-27 22:46               ` Neil Brown
2002-10-30 23:29           ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-30 23:53             ` Neil Brown
2002-10-31  2:06               ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-31 15:40                 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-31 16:56                   ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-11-01  1:10                     ` Neil Brown
2002-11-04 21:13                       ` Andrew Theurer
2002-11-01  0:54                   ` Neil Brown
2002-11-01  1:39                     ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-11-01  3:41                     ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-11-01  4:20                       ` Neil Brown
2002-11-01  5:07                         ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-25 17:23         ` Trond Myklebust
2002-10-26  3:26           ` Hirokazu Takahashi
     [not found] <3D89176B.40FFD09B@digeo.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <20020919.221513.28808421.taka@valinux.co.jp.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]   ` <3D8A36A5.846D806@digeo.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-09-20  1:00     ` Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS for 2.5.36 Andi Kleen
2002-09-20  1:09       ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-20  1:23         ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='004d01c276bb$39b32980$2a060e09@beavis' \
    --to=habanero@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
    --cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.