* Re: dt_binding_check report false alarm?
@ 2023-05-25 15:23 ` William Zhang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: William Zhang @ 2023-05-25 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Conor Dooley
Cc: devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, f.fainelli, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Rob Herring
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2696 bytes --]
Sorry for the multiple emails. Our mail relay server was not working
properly.
Hi Conor,
On 05/25/2023 06:23 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> Hey William,
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 10:02:41PM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It seems dt_binding_check reports a false error when run on this
>> modified yaml. I picked this simple file just to demostrate this issue.
>> Basically I made the interrupts and interrupt-names as optional
>> properties. But when there are two interrupts present, then
>> interrupt-names are required. However in the example, I don't define
>> interrupts and interrupt-name at all, the dt binding check reports error
>> that interrupt-names are required:
>
> Rob and Krzysztof would know more than me, but since they're not
> around...
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>> index 563a31605d2b..c37a3a64a78c 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>> @@ -32,11 +32,18 @@ properties:
>> clock-names:
>> const: ipg
>>
>> +allOf:
>> + - if:
>> + properties:
>> + interrupts:
>> + minItems: 2
>
> ...I don't think you can actually do this and "minItems: 2" will always
> evaluate to true because it is an assignment. Don't hold me to that
> though! The standard pattern here is to do:
> allOf:
> - if:
> properties:
> compatible:
> contains:
> const: foo
> then:
> required:
> - interrupt-names
>
> Cheers,
> Conor.
>
Our device can use one or two interrupt, or choose to not use interrupt
at all(polling mode). Interrupt names is only required when there are
two interrupts(so the driver code can tell which is which). So I will
need to check if it contains two interrupts. My check does work if I
have two interrupt but don't have interrupt name, the check catches the
error. If I have one interrupt without interrupt name, the check pass.
Only when I does not have interrupt and interrupt name, it falsely
report error. Looks to me that it does not treat minItem = 0 case
properly.
>> + then:
>> + required:
>> + - interrupt-names
>> +
>> required:
>> - compatible
>> - reg
>> - - interrupts
>> - - interrupt-names
>> - clocks
>> - clock-names
>>
>> @@ -49,6 +56,4 @@ examples:
>> reg = <0x53fac000 0x4000>;
>> clocks = <&clks 111>;
>> clock-names = "ipg";
>> - interrupts = <49>, <50>;
>> - interrupt-names = "scm", "smn";
>> };
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4212 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: dt_binding_check report false alarm?
2023-05-25 15:23 ` William Zhang
@ 2023-05-25 15:33 ` Conor Dooley
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2023-05-25 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Zhang
Cc: Conor Dooley, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, f.fainelli,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Rob Herring
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3356 bytes --]
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 08:23:30AM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
> Sorry for the multiple emails. Our mail relay server was not working
> properly.
I only got one /shrug
> On 05/25/2023 06:23 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > Hey William,
> >
> > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 10:02:41PM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > It seems dt_binding_check reports a false error when run on this
> > > modified yaml. I picked this simple file just to demostrate this issue.
> > > Basically I made the interrupts and interrupt-names as optional
> > > properties. But when there are two interrupts present, then
> > > interrupt-names are required. However in the example, I don't define
> > > interrupts and interrupt-name at all, the dt binding check reports error
> > > that interrupt-names are required:
> >
> > Rob and Krzysztof would know more than me, but since they're not
> > around...
> >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
> > > index 563a31605d2b..c37a3a64a78c 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
> > > @@ -32,11 +32,18 @@ properties:
> > > clock-names:
> > > const: ipg
> > > +allOf:
> > > + - if:
> > > + properties:
> > > + interrupts:
> > > + minItems: 2
> >
> > ...I don't think you can actually do this and "minItems: 2" will always
> > evaluate to true because it is an assignment. Don't hold me to that
> > though! The standard pattern here is to do:
> > allOf:
> > - if:
> > properties:
> > compatible:
> > contains:
> > const: foo
> > then:
> > required:
> > - interrupt-names
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Conor.
> >
> Our device can use one or two interrupt, or choose to not use interrupt at
> all(polling mode). Interrupt names is only required when there are two
> interrupts(so the driver code can tell which is which). So I will need to
> check if it contains two interrupts. My check does work if I have two
> interrupt but don't have interrupt name, the check catches the error. If I
> have one interrupt without interrupt name, the check pass. Only when I does
> not have interrupt and interrupt name, it falsely report error. Looks to
> me that it does not treat minItem = 0 case properly.
Right. I would not bother with the "only interrupt-names when 2
interrupts" stuff & do the simple thing of always making it required
when you have interrupts.
Then you can use allOf and oneOf to allow for both schemes for the new
device and keep enforcement of 2 items for the existing one.
Cheers,
Conor.
> > > + then:
> > > + required:
> > > + - interrupt-names
> > > +
> > > required:
> > > - compatible
> > > - reg
> > > - - interrupts
> > > - - interrupt-names
> > > - clocks
> > > - clock-names
> > > @@ -49,6 +56,4 @@ examples:
> > > reg = <0x53fac000 0x4000>;
> > > clocks = <&clks 111>;
> > > clock-names = "ipg";
> > > - interrupts = <49>, <50>;
> > > - interrupt-names = "scm", "smn";
> > > };
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
> >
> >
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: dt_binding_check report false alarm?
@ 2023-05-25 15:33 ` Conor Dooley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2023-05-25 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Zhang
Cc: Conor Dooley, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, f.fainelli,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Rob Herring
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3356 bytes --]
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 08:23:30AM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
> Sorry for the multiple emails. Our mail relay server was not working
> properly.
I only got one /shrug
> On 05/25/2023 06:23 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > Hey William,
> >
> > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 10:02:41PM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > It seems dt_binding_check reports a false error when run on this
> > > modified yaml. I picked this simple file just to demostrate this issue.
> > > Basically I made the interrupts and interrupt-names as optional
> > > properties. But when there are two interrupts present, then
> > > interrupt-names are required. However in the example, I don't define
> > > interrupts and interrupt-name at all, the dt binding check reports error
> > > that interrupt-names are required:
> >
> > Rob and Krzysztof would know more than me, but since they're not
> > around...
> >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
> > > index 563a31605d2b..c37a3a64a78c 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
> > > @@ -32,11 +32,18 @@ properties:
> > > clock-names:
> > > const: ipg
> > > +allOf:
> > > + - if:
> > > + properties:
> > > + interrupts:
> > > + minItems: 2
> >
> > ...I don't think you can actually do this and "minItems: 2" will always
> > evaluate to true because it is an assignment. Don't hold me to that
> > though! The standard pattern here is to do:
> > allOf:
> > - if:
> > properties:
> > compatible:
> > contains:
> > const: foo
> > then:
> > required:
> > - interrupt-names
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Conor.
> >
> Our device can use one or two interrupt, or choose to not use interrupt at
> all(polling mode). Interrupt names is only required when there are two
> interrupts(so the driver code can tell which is which). So I will need to
> check if it contains two interrupts. My check does work if I have two
> interrupt but don't have interrupt name, the check catches the error. If I
> have one interrupt without interrupt name, the check pass. Only when I does
> not have interrupt and interrupt name, it falsely report error. Looks to
> me that it does not treat minItem = 0 case properly.
Right. I would not bother with the "only interrupt-names when 2
interrupts" stuff & do the simple thing of always making it required
when you have interrupts.
Then you can use allOf and oneOf to allow for both schemes for the new
device and keep enforcement of 2 items for the existing one.
Cheers,
Conor.
> > > + then:
> > > + required:
> > > + - interrupt-names
> > > +
> > > required:
> > > - compatible
> > > - reg
> > > - - interrupts
> > > - - interrupt-names
> > > - clocks
> > > - clock-names
> > > @@ -49,6 +56,4 @@ examples:
> > > reg = <0x53fac000 0x4000>;
> > > clocks = <&clks 111>;
> > > clock-names = "ipg";
> > > - interrupts = <49>, <50>;
> > > - interrupt-names = "scm", "smn";
> > > };
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
> >
> >
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: dt_binding_check report false alarm?
2023-05-25 15:33 ` Conor Dooley
@ 2023-05-25 17:10 ` William Zhang
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: William Zhang @ 2023-05-25 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Conor Dooley
Cc: Conor Dooley, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, f.fainelli,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Rob Herring
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3756 bytes --]
On 05/25/2023 08:33 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 08:23:30AM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
>> Sorry for the multiple emails. Our mail relay server was not working
>> properly.
>
> I only got one /shrug
>
That's good. Maybe it only flushed queued email to internal email accounts.
>> On 05/25/2023 06:23 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> Hey William,
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 10:02:41PM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> It seems dt_binding_check reports a false error when run on this
>>>> modified yaml. I picked this simple file just to demostrate this issue.
>>>> Basically I made the interrupts and interrupt-names as optional
>>>> properties. But when there are two interrupts present, then
>>>> interrupt-names are required. However in the example, I don't define
>>>> interrupts and interrupt-name at all, the dt binding check reports error
>>>> that interrupt-names are required:
>>>
>>> Rob and Krzysztof would know more than me, but since they're not
>>> around...
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>>> index 563a31605d2b..c37a3a64a78c 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>>> @@ -32,11 +32,18 @@ properties:
>>>> clock-names:
>>>> const: ipg
>>>> +allOf:
>>>> + - if:
>>>> + properties:
>>>> + interrupts:
>>>> + minItems: 2
>>>
>>> ...I don't think you can actually do this and "minItems: 2" will always
>>> evaluate to true because it is an assignment. Don't hold me to that
>>> though! The standard pattern here is to do:
>>> allOf:
>>> - if:
>>> properties:
>>> compatible:
>>> contains:
>>> const: foo
>>> then:
>>> required:
>>> - interrupt-names
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Conor.
>>>
>> Our device can use one or two interrupt, or choose to not use interrupt at
>> all(polling mode). Interrupt names is only required when there are two
>> interrupts(so the driver code can tell which is which). So I will need to
>> check if it contains two interrupts. My check does work if I have two
>> interrupt but don't have interrupt name, the check catches the error. If I
>> have one interrupt without interrupt name, the check pass. Only when I does
>> not have interrupt and interrupt name, it falsely report error. Looks to
>> me that it does not treat minItem = 0 case properly.
>
> Right. I would not bother with the "only interrupt-names when 2
> interrupts" stuff & do the simple thing of always making it required
> when you have interrupts.
> Then you can use allOf and oneOf to allow for both schemes for the new
> device and keep enforcement of 2 items for the existing one.
>
> Cheers,
> Conor.
>
I agree it is better to keep it simple. Sorry I am still new to yaml but
what is the best way to check if interrupt property exist? What I can
think of is similar
- if:
properties:
interrupts:
minItems: 1
then:
required:
- interrupt-names
But this still reports the same error when there is no interrupt.
>>>> + then:
>>>> + required:
>>>> + - interrupt-names
>>>> +
>>>> required:
>>>> - compatible
>>>> - reg
>>>> - - interrupts
>>>> - - interrupt-names
>>>> - clocks
>>>> - clock-names
>>>> @@ -49,6 +56,4 @@ examples:
>>>> reg = <0x53fac000 0x4000>;
>>>> clocks = <&clks 111>;
>>>> clock-names = "ipg";
>>>> - interrupts = <49>, <50>;
>>>> - interrupt-names = "scm", "smn";
>>>> };
>>>> --
>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4212 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: dt_binding_check report false alarm?
@ 2023-05-25 17:10 ` William Zhang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: William Zhang @ 2023-05-25 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Conor Dooley
Cc: Conor Dooley, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, f.fainelli,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Rob Herring
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3756 bytes --]
On 05/25/2023 08:33 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 08:23:30AM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
>> Sorry for the multiple emails. Our mail relay server was not working
>> properly.
>
> I only got one /shrug
>
That's good. Maybe it only flushed queued email to internal email accounts.
>> On 05/25/2023 06:23 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> Hey William,
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 10:02:41PM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> It seems dt_binding_check reports a false error when run on this
>>>> modified yaml. I picked this simple file just to demostrate this issue.
>>>> Basically I made the interrupts and interrupt-names as optional
>>>> properties. But when there are two interrupts present, then
>>>> interrupt-names are required. However in the example, I don't define
>>>> interrupts and interrupt-name at all, the dt binding check reports error
>>>> that interrupt-names are required:
>>>
>>> Rob and Krzysztof would know more than me, but since they're not
>>> around...
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>>> index 563a31605d2b..c37a3a64a78c 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>>> @@ -32,11 +32,18 @@ properties:
>>>> clock-names:
>>>> const: ipg
>>>> +allOf:
>>>> + - if:
>>>> + properties:
>>>> + interrupts:
>>>> + minItems: 2
>>>
>>> ...I don't think you can actually do this and "minItems: 2" will always
>>> evaluate to true because it is an assignment. Don't hold me to that
>>> though! The standard pattern here is to do:
>>> allOf:
>>> - if:
>>> properties:
>>> compatible:
>>> contains:
>>> const: foo
>>> then:
>>> required:
>>> - interrupt-names
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Conor.
>>>
>> Our device can use one or two interrupt, or choose to not use interrupt at
>> all(polling mode). Interrupt names is only required when there are two
>> interrupts(so the driver code can tell which is which). So I will need to
>> check if it contains two interrupts. My check does work if I have two
>> interrupt but don't have interrupt name, the check catches the error. If I
>> have one interrupt without interrupt name, the check pass. Only when I does
>> not have interrupt and interrupt name, it falsely report error. Looks to
>> me that it does not treat minItem = 0 case properly.
>
> Right. I would not bother with the "only interrupt-names when 2
> interrupts" stuff & do the simple thing of always making it required
> when you have interrupts.
> Then you can use allOf and oneOf to allow for both schemes for the new
> device and keep enforcement of 2 items for the existing one.
>
> Cheers,
> Conor.
>
I agree it is better to keep it simple. Sorry I am still new to yaml but
what is the best way to check if interrupt property exist? What I can
think of is similar
- if:
properties:
interrupts:
minItems: 1
then:
required:
- interrupt-names
But this still reports the same error when there is no interrupt.
>>>> + then:
>>>> + required:
>>>> + - interrupt-names
>>>> +
>>>> required:
>>>> - compatible
>>>> - reg
>>>> - - interrupts
>>>> - - interrupt-names
>>>> - clocks
>>>> - clock-names
>>>> @@ -49,6 +56,4 @@ examples:
>>>> reg = <0x53fac000 0x4000>;
>>>> clocks = <&clks 111>;
>>>> clock-names = "ipg";
>>>> - interrupts = <49>, <50>;
>>>> - interrupt-names = "scm", "smn";
>>>> };
>>>> --
>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4212 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: dt_binding_check report false alarm?
2023-05-25 17:10 ` William Zhang
@ 2023-05-25 18:12 ` Conor Dooley
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2023-05-25 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Zhang
Cc: Conor Dooley, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, f.fainelli,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Rob Herring
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4851 bytes --]
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:10:46AM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 05/25/2023 08:33 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 08:23:30AM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
> > > Sorry for the multiple emails. Our mail relay server was not working
> > > properly.
> >
> > I only got one /shrug
> >
> That's good. Maybe it only flushed queued email to internal email accounts.
>
> > > On 05/25/2023 06:23 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > > Hey William,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 10:02:41PM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems dt_binding_check reports a false error when run on this
> > > > > modified yaml. I picked this simple file just to demostrate this issue.
> > > > > Basically I made the interrupts and interrupt-names as optional
> > > > > properties. But when there are two interrupts present, then
> > > > > interrupt-names are required. However in the example, I don't define
> > > > > interrupts and interrupt-name at all, the dt binding check reports error
> > > > > that interrupt-names are required:
> > > >
> > > > Rob and Krzysztof would know more than me, but since they're not
> > > > around...
> > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
> > > > > index 563a31605d2b..c37a3a64a78c 100644
> > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
> > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
> > > > > @@ -32,11 +32,18 @@ properties:
> > > > > clock-names:
> > > > > const: ipg
> > > > > +allOf:
> > > > > + - if:
> > > > > + properties:
> > > > > + interrupts:
> > > > > + minItems: 2
> > > >
> > > > ...I don't think you can actually do this and "minItems: 2" will always
> > > > evaluate to true because it is an assignment. Don't hold me to that
> > > > though! The standard pattern here is to do:
> > > > allOf:
> > > > - if:
> > > > properties:
> > > > compatible:
> > > > contains:
> > > > const: foo
> > > > then:
> > > > required:
> > > > - interrupt-names
> > > Our device can use one or two interrupt, or choose to not use interrupt at
> > > all(polling mode). Interrupt names is only required when there are two
> > > interrupts(so the driver code can tell which is which). So I will need to
> > > check if it contains two interrupts. My check does work if I have two
> > > interrupt but don't have interrupt name, the check catches the error. If I
> > > have one interrupt without interrupt name, the check pass. Only when I does
> > > not have interrupt and interrupt name, it falsely report error. Looks to
> > > me that it does not treat minItem = 0 case properly.
> >
> > Right. I would not bother with the "only interrupt-names when 2
> > interrupts" stuff & do the simple thing of always making it required
> > when you have interrupts.
> > Then you can use allOf and oneOf to allow for both schemes for the new
> > device and keep enforcement of 2 items for the existing one.
> I agree it is better to keep it simple. Sorry I am still new to yaml but
> what is the best way to check if interrupt property exist? What I can think
> of is similar
>
> - if:
> properties:
> interrupts:
> minItems: 1
> then:
> required:
> - interrupt-names
>
> But this still reports the same error when there is no interrupt.
Yeah, you don't need to do something like that.
It's hard to say exactly without your actual patch, but I think you're
over complicating things :)
What you seem to want to do (from where I am sitting) is something like:
dependencies:
interrupts: interrupt-names
and not put interrupts/interrupt-names in the required bit.
That way, if you have interrupts, you need to have interrupt-names too
but you can have neither.
But yeah, without something resembling the "real" patch, rather than
hacking at the fsl one, it is kinda hard to say.
Cheers,
Conor.
>
> > > > > + then:
> > > > > + required:
> > > > > + - interrupt-names
> > > > > +
> > > > > required:
> > > > > - compatible
> > > > > - reg
> > > > > - - interrupts
> > > > > - - interrupt-names
> > > > > - clocks
> > > > > - clock-names
> > > > > @@ -49,6 +56,4 @@ examples:
> > > > > reg = <0x53fac000 0x4000>;
> > > > > clocks = <&clks 111>;
> > > > > clock-names = "ipg";
> > > > > - interrupts = <49>, <50>;
> > > > > - interrupt-names = "scm", "smn";
> > > > > };
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.34.1
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: dt_binding_check report false alarm?
@ 2023-05-25 18:12 ` Conor Dooley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2023-05-25 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Zhang
Cc: Conor Dooley, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, f.fainelli,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Rob Herring
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4851 bytes --]
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:10:46AM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 05/25/2023 08:33 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 08:23:30AM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
> > > Sorry for the multiple emails. Our mail relay server was not working
> > > properly.
> >
> > I only got one /shrug
> >
> That's good. Maybe it only flushed queued email to internal email accounts.
>
> > > On 05/25/2023 06:23 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > > Hey William,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 10:02:41PM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems dt_binding_check reports a false error when run on this
> > > > > modified yaml. I picked this simple file just to demostrate this issue.
> > > > > Basically I made the interrupts and interrupt-names as optional
> > > > > properties. But when there are two interrupts present, then
> > > > > interrupt-names are required. However in the example, I don't define
> > > > > interrupts and interrupt-name at all, the dt binding check reports error
> > > > > that interrupt-names are required:
> > > >
> > > > Rob and Krzysztof would know more than me, but since they're not
> > > > around...
> > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
> > > > > index 563a31605d2b..c37a3a64a78c 100644
> > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
> > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
> > > > > @@ -32,11 +32,18 @@ properties:
> > > > > clock-names:
> > > > > const: ipg
> > > > > +allOf:
> > > > > + - if:
> > > > > + properties:
> > > > > + interrupts:
> > > > > + minItems: 2
> > > >
> > > > ...I don't think you can actually do this and "minItems: 2" will always
> > > > evaluate to true because it is an assignment. Don't hold me to that
> > > > though! The standard pattern here is to do:
> > > > allOf:
> > > > - if:
> > > > properties:
> > > > compatible:
> > > > contains:
> > > > const: foo
> > > > then:
> > > > required:
> > > > - interrupt-names
> > > Our device can use one or two interrupt, or choose to not use interrupt at
> > > all(polling mode). Interrupt names is only required when there are two
> > > interrupts(so the driver code can tell which is which). So I will need to
> > > check if it contains two interrupts. My check does work if I have two
> > > interrupt but don't have interrupt name, the check catches the error. If I
> > > have one interrupt without interrupt name, the check pass. Only when I does
> > > not have interrupt and interrupt name, it falsely report error. Looks to
> > > me that it does not treat minItem = 0 case properly.
> >
> > Right. I would not bother with the "only interrupt-names when 2
> > interrupts" stuff & do the simple thing of always making it required
> > when you have interrupts.
> > Then you can use allOf and oneOf to allow for both schemes for the new
> > device and keep enforcement of 2 items for the existing one.
> I agree it is better to keep it simple. Sorry I am still new to yaml but
> what is the best way to check if interrupt property exist? What I can think
> of is similar
>
> - if:
> properties:
> interrupts:
> minItems: 1
> then:
> required:
> - interrupt-names
>
> But this still reports the same error when there is no interrupt.
Yeah, you don't need to do something like that.
It's hard to say exactly without your actual patch, but I think you're
over complicating things :)
What you seem to want to do (from where I am sitting) is something like:
dependencies:
interrupts: interrupt-names
and not put interrupts/interrupt-names in the required bit.
That way, if you have interrupts, you need to have interrupt-names too
but you can have neither.
But yeah, without something resembling the "real" patch, rather than
hacking at the fsl one, it is kinda hard to say.
Cheers,
Conor.
>
> > > > > + then:
> > > > > + required:
> > > > > + - interrupt-names
> > > > > +
> > > > > required:
> > > > > - compatible
> > > > > - reg
> > > > > - - interrupts
> > > > > - - interrupt-names
> > > > > - clocks
> > > > > - clock-names
> > > > > @@ -49,6 +56,4 @@ examples:
> > > > > reg = <0x53fac000 0x4000>;
> > > > > clocks = <&clks 111>;
> > > > > clock-names = "ipg";
> > > > > - interrupts = <49>, <50>;
> > > > > - interrupt-names = "scm", "smn";
> > > > > };
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.34.1
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: dt_binding_check report false alarm?
2023-05-25 18:12 ` Conor Dooley
@ 2023-05-26 5:56 ` William Zhang
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: William Zhang @ 2023-05-26 5:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Conor Dooley
Cc: Conor Dooley, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, f.fainelli,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Rob Herring
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5173 bytes --]
On 05/25/2023 11:12 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:10:46AM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/25/2023 08:33 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 08:23:30AM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
>>>> Sorry for the multiple emails. Our mail relay server was not working
>>>> properly.
>>>
>>> I only got one /shrug
>>>
>> That's good. Maybe it only flushed queued email to internal email accounts.
>>
>>>> On 05/25/2023 06:23 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>>> Hey William,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 10:02:41PM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems dt_binding_check reports a false error when run on this
>>>>>> modified yaml. I picked this simple file just to demostrate this issue.
>>>>>> Basically I made the interrupts and interrupt-names as optional
>>>>>> properties. But when there are two interrupts present, then
>>>>>> interrupt-names are required. However in the example, I don't define
>>>>>> interrupts and interrupt-name at all, the dt binding check reports error
>>>>>> that interrupt-names are required:
>>>>>
>>>>> Rob and Krzysztof would know more than me, but since they're not
>>>>> around...
>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>>>>> index 563a31605d2b..c37a3a64a78c 100644
>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>>>>> @@ -32,11 +32,18 @@ properties:
>>>>>> clock-names:
>>>>>> const: ipg
>>>>>> +allOf:
>>>>>> + - if:
>>>>>> + properties:
>>>>>> + interrupts:
>>>>>> + minItems: 2
>>>>>
>>>>> ...I don't think you can actually do this and "minItems: 2" will always
>>>>> evaluate to true because it is an assignment. Don't hold me to that
>>>>> though! The standard pattern here is to do:
>>>>> allOf:
>>>>> - if:
>>>>> properties:
>>>>> compatible:
>>>>> contains:
>>>>> const: foo
>>>>> then:
>>>>> required:
>>>>> - interrupt-names
>
>>>> Our device can use one or two interrupt, or choose to not use interrupt at
>>>> all(polling mode). Interrupt names is only required when there are two
>>>> interrupts(so the driver code can tell which is which). So I will need to
>>>> check if it contains two interrupts. My check does work if I have two
>>>> interrupt but don't have interrupt name, the check catches the error. If I
>>>> have one interrupt without interrupt name, the check pass. Only when I does
>>>> not have interrupt and interrupt name, it falsely report error. Looks to
>>>> me that it does not treat minItem = 0 case properly.
>>>
>>> Right. I would not bother with the "only interrupt-names when 2
>>> interrupts" stuff & do the simple thing of always making it required
>>> when you have interrupts.
>>> Then you can use allOf and oneOf to allow for both schemes for the new
>>> device and keep enforcement of 2 items for the existing one.
>
>> I agree it is better to keep it simple. Sorry I am still new to yaml but
>> what is the best way to check if interrupt property exist? What I can think
>> of is similar
>>
>> - if:
>> properties:
>> interrupts:
>> minItems: 1
>> then:
>> required:
>> - interrupt-names
>>
>> But this still reports the same error when there is no interrupt.
>
> Yeah, you don't need to do something like that.
> It's hard to say exactly without your actual patch, but I think you're
> over complicating things :)
> What you seem to want to do (from where I am sitting) is something like:
> dependencies:
> interrupts: interrupt-names
>
> and not put interrupts/interrupt-names in the required bit.
> That way, if you have interrupts, you need to have interrupt-names too
> but you can have neither.
>
> But yeah, without something resembling the "real" patch, rather than
> hacking at the fsl one, it is kinda hard to say.
>
> Cheers,
> Conor.
>
>
Yeah this dependencies rule works and it is much simple. Just need to
add the bracket around the interrupt-names to make it work:
dependencies:
interrupts: [interrupt-names]
Do we have any document list all these supported keywords/rules/syntax
for yaml dts?
My file is actually brcm,brcmnand.yaml but it is little bit complicated
to demonstrate the issue so just randomly pick this simple one. Thanks
Conor, Robin and all the for help. Will submit an official patches for
brcmnand.yaml change.
>>
>>>>>> + then:
>>>>>> + required:
>>>>>> + - interrupt-names
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> required:
>>>>>> - compatible
>>>>>> - reg
>>>>>> - - interrupts
>>>>>> - - interrupt-names
>>>>>> - clocks
>>>>>> - clock-names
>>>>>> @@ -49,6 +56,4 @@ examples:
>>>>>> reg = <0x53fac000 0x4000>;
>>>>>> clocks = <&clks 111>;
>>>>>> clock-names = "ipg";
>>>>>> - interrupts = <49>, <50>;
>>>>>> - interrupt-names = "scm", "smn";
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4212 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: dt_binding_check report false alarm?
@ 2023-05-26 5:56 ` William Zhang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: William Zhang @ 2023-05-26 5:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Conor Dooley
Cc: Conor Dooley, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, f.fainelli,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Rob Herring
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5173 bytes --]
On 05/25/2023 11:12 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:10:46AM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/25/2023 08:33 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 08:23:30AM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
>>>> Sorry for the multiple emails. Our mail relay server was not working
>>>> properly.
>>>
>>> I only got one /shrug
>>>
>> That's good. Maybe it only flushed queued email to internal email accounts.
>>
>>>> On 05/25/2023 06:23 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>>> Hey William,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 10:02:41PM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems dt_binding_check reports a false error when run on this
>>>>>> modified yaml. I picked this simple file just to demostrate this issue.
>>>>>> Basically I made the interrupts and interrupt-names as optional
>>>>>> properties. But when there are two interrupts present, then
>>>>>> interrupt-names are required. However in the example, I don't define
>>>>>> interrupts and interrupt-name at all, the dt binding check reports error
>>>>>> that interrupt-names are required:
>>>>>
>>>>> Rob and Krzysztof would know more than me, but since they're not
>>>>> around...
>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>>>>> index 563a31605d2b..c37a3a64a78c 100644
>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>>>>> @@ -32,11 +32,18 @@ properties:
>>>>>> clock-names:
>>>>>> const: ipg
>>>>>> +allOf:
>>>>>> + - if:
>>>>>> + properties:
>>>>>> + interrupts:
>>>>>> + minItems: 2
>>>>>
>>>>> ...I don't think you can actually do this and "minItems: 2" will always
>>>>> evaluate to true because it is an assignment. Don't hold me to that
>>>>> though! The standard pattern here is to do:
>>>>> allOf:
>>>>> - if:
>>>>> properties:
>>>>> compatible:
>>>>> contains:
>>>>> const: foo
>>>>> then:
>>>>> required:
>>>>> - interrupt-names
>
>>>> Our device can use one or two interrupt, or choose to not use interrupt at
>>>> all(polling mode). Interrupt names is only required when there are two
>>>> interrupts(so the driver code can tell which is which). So I will need to
>>>> check if it contains two interrupts. My check does work if I have two
>>>> interrupt but don't have interrupt name, the check catches the error. If I
>>>> have one interrupt without interrupt name, the check pass. Only when I does
>>>> not have interrupt and interrupt name, it falsely report error. Looks to
>>>> me that it does not treat minItem = 0 case properly.
>>>
>>> Right. I would not bother with the "only interrupt-names when 2
>>> interrupts" stuff & do the simple thing of always making it required
>>> when you have interrupts.
>>> Then you can use allOf and oneOf to allow for both schemes for the new
>>> device and keep enforcement of 2 items for the existing one.
>
>> I agree it is better to keep it simple. Sorry I am still new to yaml but
>> what is the best way to check if interrupt property exist? What I can think
>> of is similar
>>
>> - if:
>> properties:
>> interrupts:
>> minItems: 1
>> then:
>> required:
>> - interrupt-names
>>
>> But this still reports the same error when there is no interrupt.
>
> Yeah, you don't need to do something like that.
> It's hard to say exactly without your actual patch, but I think you're
> over complicating things :)
> What you seem to want to do (from where I am sitting) is something like:
> dependencies:
> interrupts: interrupt-names
>
> and not put interrupts/interrupt-names in the required bit.
> That way, if you have interrupts, you need to have interrupt-names too
> but you can have neither.
>
> But yeah, without something resembling the "real" patch, rather than
> hacking at the fsl one, it is kinda hard to say.
>
> Cheers,
> Conor.
>
>
Yeah this dependencies rule works and it is much simple. Just need to
add the bracket around the interrupt-names to make it work:
dependencies:
interrupts: [interrupt-names]
Do we have any document list all these supported keywords/rules/syntax
for yaml dts?
My file is actually brcm,brcmnand.yaml but it is little bit complicated
to demonstrate the issue so just randomly pick this simple one. Thanks
Conor, Robin and all the for help. Will submit an official patches for
brcmnand.yaml change.
>>
>>>>>> + then:
>>>>>> + required:
>>>>>> + - interrupt-names
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> required:
>>>>>> - compatible
>>>>>> - reg
>>>>>> - - interrupts
>>>>>> - - interrupt-names
>>>>>> - clocks
>>>>>> - clock-names
>>>>>> @@ -49,6 +56,4 @@ examples:
>>>>>> reg = <0x53fac000 0x4000>;
>>>>>> clocks = <&clks 111>;
>>>>>> clock-names = "ipg";
>>>>>> - interrupts = <49>, <50>;
>>>>>> - interrupt-names = "scm", "smn";
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4212 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* Re: dt_binding_check report false alarm?
2023-05-26 5:56 ` William Zhang
@ 2023-05-26 6:25 ` Conor Dooley
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2023-05-26 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Zhang
Cc: Conor Dooley, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, f.fainelli,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Rob Herring
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 312 bytes --]
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:56:45PM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
> Do we have any document list all these supported keywords/rules/syntax for
> yaml dts?
The example schema is a good place to look:
https://docs.kernel.org/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.html?highlight=example+schema#annotated-example-schema
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: dt_binding_check report false alarm?
@ 2023-05-26 6:25 ` Conor Dooley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2023-05-26 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Zhang
Cc: Conor Dooley, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, f.fainelli,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Rob Herring
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 312 bytes --]
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:56:45PM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
> Do we have any document list all these supported keywords/rules/syntax for
> yaml dts?
The example schema is a good place to look:
https://docs.kernel.org/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.html?highlight=example+schema#annotated-example-schema
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: dt_binding_check report false alarm?
2023-05-25 15:23 ` William Zhang
@ 2023-05-25 17:29 ` Robin Murphy
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Robin Murphy @ 2023-05-25 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Zhang, Conor Dooley
Cc: devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, f.fainelli, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Rob Herring
On 25/05/2023 4:23 pm, William Zhang wrote:
> Sorry for the multiple emails. Our mail relay server was not working
> properly.
>
> Hi Conor,
>
> On 05/25/2023 06:23 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> Hey William,
>>
>> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 10:02:41PM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It seems dt_binding_check reports a false error when run on this
>>> modified yaml. I picked this simple file just to demostrate this issue.
>>> Basically I made the interrupts and interrupt-names as optional
>>> properties. But when there are two interrupts present, then
>>> interrupt-names are required. However in the example, I don't define
>>> interrupts and interrupt-name at all, the dt binding check reports error
>>> that interrupt-names are required:
>>
>> Rob and Krzysztof would know more than me, but since they're not
>> around...
>>
>>> diff --git
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>> index 563a31605d2b..c37a3a64a78c 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>> @@ -32,11 +32,18 @@ properties:
>>> clock-names:
>>> const: ipg
>>> +allOf:
>>> + - if:
>>> + properties:
>>> + interrupts:
>>> + minItems: 2
>>
>> ...I don't think you can actually do this and "minItems: 2" will always
>> evaluate to true because it is an assignment. Don't hold me to that
>> though! The standard pattern here is to do:
>> allOf:
>> - if:
>> properties:
>> compatible:
>> contains:
>> const: foo
>> then:
>> required:
>> - interrupt-names
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Conor.
>>
> Our device can use one or two interrupt, or choose to not use interrupt
> at all(polling mode). Interrupt names is only required when there are
> two interrupts(so the driver code can tell which is which). So I will
> need to check if it contains two interrupts. My check does work if I
> have two interrupt but don't have interrupt name, the check catches the
> error. If I have one interrupt without interrupt name, the check pass.
> Only when I does not have interrupt and interrupt name, it falsely
> report error. Looks to me that it does not treat minItem = 0 case
> properly.
Note that minItems = 0 is *not* the same as the property being absent
(that would represent an empty property, i.e. just "interrupts;")
The conditional schema fragment only says that an "interrupts" property
must have at least two entries in order to match. However it doesn't say
that the property is required, and thus the example DT (without the
property) does not fail to match the constraints of the given schema,
and thus the condition ends up true.
It certainly took me several goes to get my head round how conditionals
work, and the notion that what goes under the "if:" is a schema
definition in its own right :)
Robin.
>
>
>>> + then:
>>> + required:
>>> + - interrupt-names
>>> +
>>> required:
>>> - compatible
>>> - reg
>>> - - interrupts
>>> - - interrupt-names
>>> - clocks
>>> - clock-names
>>> @@ -49,6 +56,4 @@ examples:
>>> reg = <0x53fac000 0x4000>;
>>> clocks = <&clks 111>;
>>> clock-names = "ipg";
>>> - interrupts = <49>, <50>;
>>> - interrupt-names = "scm", "smn";
>>> };
>>> --
>>> 2.34.1
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: dt_binding_check report false alarm?
@ 2023-05-25 17:29 ` Robin Murphy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Robin Murphy @ 2023-05-25 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Zhang, Conor Dooley
Cc: devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, f.fainelli, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Rob Herring
On 25/05/2023 4:23 pm, William Zhang wrote:
> Sorry for the multiple emails. Our mail relay server was not working
> properly.
>
> Hi Conor,
>
> On 05/25/2023 06:23 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> Hey William,
>>
>> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 10:02:41PM -0700, William Zhang wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It seems dt_binding_check reports a false error when run on this
>>> modified yaml. I picked this simple file just to demostrate this issue.
>>> Basically I made the interrupts and interrupt-names as optional
>>> properties. But when there are two interrupts present, then
>>> interrupt-names are required. However in the example, I don't define
>>> interrupts and interrupt-name at all, the dt binding check reports error
>>> that interrupt-names are required:
>>
>> Rob and Krzysztof would know more than me, but since they're not
>> around...
>>
>>> diff --git
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>> index 563a31605d2b..c37a3a64a78c 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.yaml
>>> @@ -32,11 +32,18 @@ properties:
>>> clock-names:
>>> const: ipg
>>> +allOf:
>>> + - if:
>>> + properties:
>>> + interrupts:
>>> + minItems: 2
>>
>> ...I don't think you can actually do this and "minItems: 2" will always
>> evaluate to true because it is an assignment. Don't hold me to that
>> though! The standard pattern here is to do:
>> allOf:
>> - if:
>> properties:
>> compatible:
>> contains:
>> const: foo
>> then:
>> required:
>> - interrupt-names
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Conor.
>>
> Our device can use one or two interrupt, or choose to not use interrupt
> at all(polling mode). Interrupt names is only required when there are
> two interrupts(so the driver code can tell which is which). So I will
> need to check if it contains two interrupts. My check does work if I
> have two interrupt but don't have interrupt name, the check catches the
> error. If I have one interrupt without interrupt name, the check pass.
> Only when I does not have interrupt and interrupt name, it falsely
> report error. Looks to me that it does not treat minItem = 0 case
> properly.
Note that minItems = 0 is *not* the same as the property being absent
(that would represent an empty property, i.e. just "interrupts;")
The conditional schema fragment only says that an "interrupts" property
must have at least two entries in order to match. However it doesn't say
that the property is required, and thus the example DT (without the
property) does not fail to match the constraints of the given schema,
and thus the condition ends up true.
It certainly took me several goes to get my head round how conditionals
work, and the notion that what goes under the "if:" is a schema
definition in its own right :)
Robin.
>
>
>>> + then:
>>> + required:
>>> + - interrupt-names
>>> +
>>> required:
>>> - compatible
>>> - reg
>>> - - interrupts
>>> - - interrupt-names
>>> - clocks
>>> - clock-names
>>> @@ -49,6 +56,4 @@ examples:
>>> reg = <0x53fac000 0x4000>;
>>> clocks = <&clks 111>;
>>> clock-names = "ipg";
>>> - interrupts = <49>, <50>;
>>> - interrupt-names = "scm", "smn";
>>> };
>>> --
>>> 2.34.1
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread