All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* -i and -o options for iptables FORWARD chain
@ 2003-12-31 23:36 Gongya Yu
  2004-01-02 13:08 ` Antony Stone
  2004-01-02 13:30 ` [despammed] " Andreas Kretschmer
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gongya Yu @ 2003-12-31 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 271 bytes --]

Hi, I just updated Linux kernel to 2.6.0 with iptables and ebtables enabled.

But iptables ignores -i and -o options for FORWARD chain. Wheneneve I use something like -i eth0 or -o eth0, the rule is just ignored.

Any suggestions ?

thanks in advance!!

Gongya Yu

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 950 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: -i and -o options for iptables FORWARD chain
  2003-12-31 23:36 -i and -o options for iptables FORWARD chain Gongya Yu
@ 2004-01-02 13:08 ` Antony Stone
  2004-01-02 13:30 ` [despammed] " Andreas Kretschmer
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Antony Stone @ 2004-01-02 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

On Wednesday 31 December 2003 11:36 pm, Gongya Yu wrote:

> Hi, I just updated Linux kernel to 2.6.0 with iptables and ebtables
> enabled.
>
> But iptables ignores -i and -o options for FORWARD chain. Wheneneve I use
> something like -i eth0 or -o eth0, the rule is just ignored.
>
> Any suggestions ?

I am not a 2.6 expert by any means, so this is just a suggestion: did you 
recompile the userspace tools (iptables) to match the new kernel code 
(netfilter)?

Antony.

-- 
My New Year's resolution is not to make any resolutions I can't keep.

I'm wondering whether I've failed already.
                                                     Please reply to the list;
                                                           please don't CC me.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [despammed] -i and -o options for iptables FORWARD chain
  2003-12-31 23:36 -i and -o options for iptables FORWARD chain Gongya Yu
  2004-01-02 13:08 ` Antony Stone
@ 2004-01-02 13:30 ` Andreas Kretschmer
  2004-01-02 14:03   ` Antony Stone
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Kretschmer @ 2004-01-02 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

am  Wed, dem 31.12.2003, um 15:36:34 -0800 mailte Gongya Yu folgendes:
> Hi, I just updated Linux kernel to 2.6.0 with iptables and ebtables enabled.

I'm using iptables on 2.4.x, possible there are differences with 2.6.x.

>  
> But iptables ignores -i and -o options for FORWARD chain. Wheneneve I use
> something like -i eth0 or -o eth0, the rule is just ignored.

RTFM!

-i is only for INPUT, FORWARD and PREROUTING
-o is only for FORWARD, OUTPUT and POSTROUTING

You can use -s and -d (Source and Destination-IP).


Andreas
-- 
Diese Message wurde erstellt mit freundlicher Unterstützung eines freilau-
fenden Pinguins aus artgerechter Freilandhaltung.   Er ist garantiert frei
von Micro$oft'schen Viren. (#97922 http://counter.li.org)     GPG 7F4584DA
Was, Sie wissen nicht, wo Kaufbach ist? Hier: N 51.05082°, E 13.56889° ;-)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [despammed] -i and -o options for iptables FORWARD chain
  2004-01-02 13:30 ` [despammed] " Andreas Kretschmer
@ 2004-01-02 14:03   ` Antony Stone
  2004-01-02 14:25     ` Andreas Kretschmer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Antony Stone @ 2004-01-02 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

On Friday 02 January 2004 1:30 pm, Andreas Kretschmer wrote:

> am  Wed, dem 31.12.2003, um 15:36:34 -0800 mailte Gongya Yu folgendes:
> > Hi, I just updated Linux kernel to 2.6.0 with iptables and ebtables
> > enabled.
>
> I'm using iptables on 2.4.x, possible there are differences with 2.6.x.
>
> > But iptables ignores -i and -o options for FORWARD chain. Wheneneve I use
> > something like -i eth0 or -o eth0, the rule is just ignored.
>
> RTFM!
>
> -i is only for INPUT, FORWARD and PREROUTING
> -o is only for FORWARD, OUTPUT and POSTROUTING

Are you suggesting that -i and -o cannot be used in FORWARD?   As far as I can 
see the syntax of the rule Gonya posted is perfectly okay.

Antony.

-- 
Christmas is an opportunity to upgrade to kernel 2.6 while no-one's around to 
notice the downtime.

                                                     Please reply to the list;
                                                           please don't CC me.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [despammed] -i and -o options for iptables FORWARD chain
  2004-01-02 14:03   ` Antony Stone
@ 2004-01-02 14:25     ` Andreas Kretschmer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Kretschmer @ 2004-01-02 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

am  Fri, dem 02.01.2004, um 14:03:02 +0000 mailte Antony Stone folgendes:
> > -i is only for INPUT, FORWARD and PREROUTING
> > -o is only for FORWARD, OUTPUT and POSTROUTING
> 
> Are you suggesting that -i and -o cannot be used in FORWARD?   As far as I can 
> see the syntax of the rule Gonya posted is perfectly okay.

Oh, i'm sorry, parse error by me =:-(


Andreas
-- 
Diese Message wurde erstellt mit freundlicher Unterstützung eines freilau-
fenden Pinguins aus artgerechter Freilandhaltung.   Er ist garantiert frei
von Micro$oft'schen Viren. (#97922 http://counter.li.org)     GPG 7F4584DA
Was, Sie wissen nicht, wo Kaufbach ist? Hier: N 51.05082°, E 13.56889° ;-)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-02 14:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-31 23:36 -i and -o options for iptables FORWARD chain Gongya Yu
2004-01-02 13:08 ` Antony Stone
2004-01-02 13:30 ` [despammed] " Andreas Kretschmer
2004-01-02 14:03   ` Antony Stone
2004-01-02 14:25     ` Andreas Kretschmer

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.