OOPS: CRITICAL BUG IN KERNEL 2.4.0 and 2.4.1

OOPS: CRITICAL BUG IN KERNEL 2.4.0 and 2.4.1

[Marcel Silva e Sousa]

Hi all, i see a critical bug in kernel version 2.4.0 and 2.4.1, look it:
i use Linux Slackware 7.1

My Hard Disk:
hda: IBM-DPTA-372730, ATA DISK drive
hda: 53464320 sectors (27374 MB) w/1961KiB Cache, CHS=3328/255/63, UDMA(33)

I have instaled in this hard disk 3 OS (OpenBSD, Linux Slack and Windows 2K 
(NTFS).

==============
OpenBSD --> 2GB
Linux -----> 7GB
Win2k ----> 18GB
==============

Windows2K is automount in fstab. When i run command "df -h" the values of 
capacity its REALLY wrong, look it:

[root@john /]:: df -h
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda1             5.4G  3.7G  1.5G  71% /
/dev/hda2             143G  136G  6.8G  95% /mnt/hda2
[root@john /]:: 

When i had kernel 2.2.18 i did not have this problem....

Sorry for my really BAD English...

Att,
Marcel Silva e Sousa
marcel@netmaxi.com.br
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: OOPS: CRITICAL BUG IN KERNEL 2.4.0 and 2.4.1

[Guest section DW]

On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 05:33:35AM -0200, Marcel Silva e Sousa wrote:
> Hi all, i see a critical bug in kernel version 2.4.0 and 2.4.1, look it:
> 
> My Hard Disk:
> hda: IBM-DPTA-372730, ATA DISK drive
> hda: 53464320 sectors (27374 MB) w/1961KiB Cache, CHS=3328/255/63, UDMA(33)
> 
> [root@john /]:: df -h
> Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda1             5.4G  3.7G  1.5G  71% /
> /dev/hda2             143G  136G  6.8G  95% /mnt/hda2
> [root@john /]:: 
> 
> When i had kernel 2.2.18 i did not have this problem....

Hmm. df is not the kernel.

But df does a statfs system call, and something might be broken,
especially if you have an unusual filesystem type.
You might report on (i) what filesystem type lives on /dev/hda2?
(ii) what does "strace -e statfs df" say? What df outputs in the
"Size" column is the value of f_blocks.

Of course, if you write garbage to the size field of some superblock,
then the kernel will happily report it - there need not be a bug.
But now that you say "2.2.18 did not have this problem":
what is the 2.2.18 df output?
What is the "dmesg | grep hda" on both 2.4 and 2.2?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/