All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com>,
	Roger Larsson <roger.larsson@skelleftea.mail.telia.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.8-pre1 and dbench -20% throughput
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 04:04:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0107280404020Y.00285@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200107272112.f6RLC3d28206@maila.telia.com> <0107280034050V.00285@starship> <01072718351100.01369@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <01072718351100.01369@localhost.localdomain>

On Saturday 28 July 2001 02:35, Steven Cole wrote:
> I also saw a significant drop in dbench 32 results.
> Here are a few more data points, this time comparing 2.4.8-pre1 with
> 2.4.7.
>
> 2.4.7   9.3422 MB/sec vs 2.4.8-pre1   6.88884 MB/sec average of 3
> runs
>
> The system under test has 384 MB of memory, and did not go
> into swap during the test.  I performed a set of three runs
> immediately after a boot, and with no pauses in between individual
> runs.  I used time ./dbench 32 and caputured the output in a file
> using script `uname -r`.  The tests were done with X and KDE running,
> but no other activity.

The variation is accounted for almost entirely by the change in system 
time.  Does this mean more IO's or more scanning?  I don't know, more 
research needed.

We need Marcelo's vm statistics patch, I wonder what the status of that 
is.

Thanks for the nice clear results, I'll try it here now. ;-)

> Here are the results of the six runs:
>
> Steven
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------- 2.4.7       average 9.3422 MB/sec
>
> Throughput 9.2929 MB/sec (NB=11.6161 MB/sec  92.929 MBit/sec)
> 34.11user 238.89system 7:34.59elapsed 60%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
> 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (1008major+1402minor)pagefaults
> 0swaps
>
> Throughput 9.56338 MB/sec (NB=11.9542 MB/sec  95.6338 MBit/sec)
> 34.07user 262.44system 7:22.72elapsed 66%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
> 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (1008major+1402minor)pagefaults
> 0swaps
>
> Throughput 9.17032 MB/sec (NB=11.4629 MB/sec  91.7032 MBit/sec)
> 33.79user 248.46system 7:41.62elapsed 61%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
> 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (1008major+1402minor)pagefaults
> 0swaps
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------- 2.4.8-pre1  average 6.88884 MB/sec
>
> Throughput 6.8078 MB/sec (NB=8.50975 MB/sec  68.078 MBit/sec)
> 34.30user 358.35system 10:21.57elapsed 63%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
> 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (1008major+1402minor)pagefaults
> 0swaps
>
> Throughput 6.91993 MB/sec (NB=8.64992 MB/sec  69.1993 MBit/sec)
> 33.62user 369.55system 10:11.43elapsed 65%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
> 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (1008major+1402minor)pagefaults
> 0swaps
>
> Throughput 6.93879 MB/sec (NB=8.67349 MB/sec  69.3879 MBit/sec)
> 33.33user 341.58system 10:09.77elapsed 61%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
> 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (1008major+1402minor)pagefaults
> 0swaps

  reply	other threads:[~2001-07-28  1:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-27 21:08 2.4.8-pre1 and dbench -20% throughput Roger Larsson
2001-07-27 21:42 ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-27 22:34 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-27 23:43   ` Roger Larsson
2001-07-27 23:43     ` Roger Larsson
2001-07-28  1:11     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-28  1:11       ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-28  3:18     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-28 13:40       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-28 20:13         ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-28 20:26           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-29 14:10             ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-29 14:48               ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-29 15:34                 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-29 15:31               ` Mike Galbraith
2001-07-29 16:05               ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-29 20:19                 ` Hugh Dickins
2001-07-29 20:25                   ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-29 20:44                     ` Hugh Dickins
2001-07-29 21:20                       ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-29 21:51                         ` Hugh Dickins
2001-07-29 23:23                           ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-31  7:30                             ` Kai Henningsen
2001-07-31 14:13                               ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-31 17:37                                 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-07-29  1:41           ` Andrew Morton
2001-07-29 14:39             ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-30  3:19             ` Theodore Tso
2001-07-30 15:17               ` Randy.Dunlap
2001-07-30 16:41                 ` Theodore Tso
2001-07-30 17:52                 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-07-30 19:39                 ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-07-29 17:48           ` Steven Cole
2001-07-28  0:35   ` Steven Cole
2001-07-28  2:04     ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2001-07-30 13:15       ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0107280404020Y.00285@starship \
    --to=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
    --cc=elenstev@mesatop.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roger.larsson@skelleftea.mail.telia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.