All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
	"Mike Galbraith <mikeg@wen-online.de> Roger Larsson"
	<roger.larsson@skelleftea.mail.telia.com>
Subject: Re: 2.4.8-pre1 and dbench -20% throughput
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 11:48:30 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01072911483000.01366@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01072822131300.00315@starship>

On Saturday 28 July 2001 14:13, Daniel Phillips wrote:
[snippage]
> Oh, by the way, my suspicions about the flakiness of dbench as a
> benchmark were confirmed: under X, having been running various memory
> hungry applications for a while, dbench on vanilla 2.4.7 turned in a 7%
> better performance (with a distinctly different process termination
> pattern) than in text mode after a clean reboot.
>

>From the FWIW department, apologies in advance if this is all moot.

Here are the results of nine runs of dbench 32.  I ran vmstat before and after
each instance of running time  ./dbench 32.  These verbose results are provided
after the following summary.  The test machine is a PIII 450, 384MB, ReiserFS on
all partitions, disks IDE. Tests were all run from an xterm and KDE2.

Steven


2.4.8-pre2 	After running 8 hours
Run #1	Throughput 5.77702 MB/sec
Run #2	Throughput 5.8781 MB/sec
Run #3	Throughput 6.08052 MB/sec

2.4.8-pre2 	After fresh reboot
Run #4	Throughput 7.18107 MB/sec
Run #5	Throughput 7.0096 MB/sec
Run #6	Throughput 7.1165 MB/sec

2.4.7      	After fresh reboot
Run #7	Throughput 8.96163 MB/sec
Run #8	Throughput 9.20907 MB/sec
Run #9	Throughput 9.88017 MB/sec

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.4.8-pre2 	After running 8 hours
   procs                      memory    swap          io     system         cpu
 r  b  w   swpd   free   buff  cache  si  so    bi    bo   in    cs  us  sy  id
 0  0  0  26272  31248  12100  63688   2   1    49   185  580   158   2   7  91

[....snipped]
Throughput 5.77702 MB/sec (NB=7.22127 MB/sec  57.7702 MBit/sec)
34.70user 426.52system 12:11.28elapsed 63%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1008major+1402minor)pagefaults 0swaps
   procs                      memory    swap          io     system         cpu
 r  b  w   swpd   free   buff  cache  si  so    bi    bo   in    cs  us  sy  id
 1  0  0  26120 130808   5656  11236   2   1    53   249  716   156   2   9  89

[....snipped]
Throughput 5.8781 MB/sec (NB=7.34763 MB/sec  58.781 MBit/sec)
34.55user 439.76system 11:59.61elapsed 65%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1008major+1402minor)pagefaults 0swaps
   procs                      memory    swap          io     system         cpu
 r  b  w   swpd   free   buff  cache  si  so    bi    bo   in    cs  us  sy  id
 1  0  0  26120 130200   5152  11884   2   1    56   310  844   154   2  11  87

[....snipped]
Throughput 6.08052 MB/sec (NB=7.60065 MB/sec  60.8052 MBit/sec)
34.36user 409.73system 11:35.69elapsed 63%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1008major+1402minor)pagefaults 0swaps
   procs                      memory    swap          io     system         cpu
 r  b  w   swpd   free   buff  cache  si  so    bi    bo   in    cs  us  sy  id
 0  0  0  26120 144324   4888  12024   2   1    59   366  962   153   2  13  86


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.4.8-pre2 	After fresh reboot
   procs                      memory    swap          io     system         cpu
 r  b  w   swpd   free   buff  cache  si  so    bi    bo   in    cs  us  sy  id
 1  0  0      0 278468   9152  56208   0   0   296   118  950   248  13  15  73

[....snipped]
Throughput 7.18107 MB/sec (NB=8.97633 MB/sec  71.8107 MBit/sec)
34.35user 348.11system 9:48.24elapsed 65%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1008major+1402minor)pagefaults 0swaps
   procs                      memory    swap          io     system         cpu
 r  b  w   swpd   free   buff  cache  si  so    bi    bo   in    cs  us  sy  id
 1  0  0      0 287192  13064  34696   0   0   167  2090 4619   125   8  69  23

[....snipped]
Throughput 7.0096 MB/sec (NB=8.762 MB/sec  70.096 MBit/sec)
33.05user 348.67system 10:03.62elapsed 63%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1008major+1402minor)pagefaults 0swaps
   procs                      memory    swap          io     system         cpu
 r  b  w   swpd   free   buff  cache  si  so    bi    bo   in    cs  us  sy  id
 1  0  0      0 285804  14440  34700   0   0   145  2368 5128   107   7  76  17

[....snipped]
Throughput 7.1165 MB/sec (NB=8.89563 MB/sec  71.165 MBit/sec)
34.67user 352.81system 9:54.57elapsed 65%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1008major+1402minor)pagefaults 0swaps
   procs                      memory    swap          io     system         cpu
 r  b  w   swpd   free   buff  cache  si  so    bi    bo   in    cs  us  sy  id
 1  0  0      0 285192  15152  34700   0   0   136  2475 5324   101   7  79  14


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.4.7      	After fresh reboot
   procs                      memory    swap          io     system         cpu
 r  b  w   swpd   free   buff  cache  si  so    bi    bo   in    cs  us  sy  id
 0  0  0      0 278356   9288  56176   0   0   293   117  941   238  13  15  73

[....snipped]
Throughput 8.96163 MB/sec (NB=11.202 MB/sec  89.6163 MBit/sec)
33.91user 244.57system 7:52.40elapsed 58%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1008major+1402minor)pagefaults 0swaps
   procs                      memory    swap          io     system         cpu
 r  b  w   swpd   free   buff  cache  si  so    bi    bo   in    cs  us  sy  id
 1  0  0      0 309540   5808  22792   0   0   193  1761 4013   133   9  64  27

[....snipped]
Throughput 9.20907 MB/sec (NB=11.5113 MB/sec  92.0907 MBit/sec)
34.43user 255.59system 7:39.69elapsed 63%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1008major+1402minor)pagefaults 0swaps
   procs                      memory    swap          io     system         cpu
 r  b  w   swpd   free   buff  cache  si  so    bi    bo   in    cs  us  sy  id
 1  0  0      0 310780   5796  21920   0   0   175  2028 4511   113   9  72  19

[....snipped]
Throughput 9.88017 MB/sec (NB=12.3502 MB/sec  98.8017 MBit/sec)
33.30user 248.82system 7:08.54elapsed 65%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1008major+1402minor)pagefaults 0swaps
   procs                      memory    swap          io     system         cpu
 r  b  w   swpd   free   buff  cache  si  so    bi    bo   in    cs  us  sy  id
 1  0  0      0 311180   5356  22024   0   0   172  2124 4694   107   8  76  16
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-07-29 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-27 21:08 2.4.8-pre1 and dbench -20% throughput Roger Larsson
2001-07-27 21:42 ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-27 22:34 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-27 23:43   ` Roger Larsson
2001-07-27 23:43     ` Roger Larsson
2001-07-28  1:11     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-28  1:11       ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-28  3:18     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-28 13:40       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-28 20:13         ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-28 20:26           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-29 14:10             ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-29 14:48               ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-29 15:34                 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-29 15:31               ` Mike Galbraith
2001-07-29 16:05               ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-29 20:19                 ` Hugh Dickins
2001-07-29 20:25                   ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-29 20:44                     ` Hugh Dickins
2001-07-29 21:20                       ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-29 21:51                         ` Hugh Dickins
2001-07-29 23:23                           ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-31  7:30                             ` Kai Henningsen
2001-07-31 14:13                               ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-31 17:37                                 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-07-29  1:41           ` Andrew Morton
2001-07-29 14:39             ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-30  3:19             ` Theodore Tso
2001-07-30 15:17               ` Randy.Dunlap
2001-07-30 16:41                 ` Theodore Tso
2001-07-30 17:52                 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-07-30 19:39                 ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-07-29 17:48           ` Steven Cole [this message]
2001-07-28  0:35   ` Steven Cole
2001-07-28  2:04     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-30 13:15       ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01072911483000.01366@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=elenstev@mesatop.com \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=roger.larsson@skelleftea.mail.telia.com \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.