* permission denied.
@ 2002-11-21 20:42 Rongqing "Frank" Tu
2002-11-21 23:34 ` Neil Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Rongqing "Frank" Tu @ 2002-11-21 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nfs
Hi All,
I am running on Linux 2.4.18-3 and try to setup a "link" nfs, but got a
"permission denied".
a link nfs is like this:
in machine 1: export A
in machine 2: mount A to B and then export B
in mahcine 3: mount B to C.
the "permission denied" occurs at the last step when I tried to mount B to
C.
I am working on a software which needs this kind of structure, so I wonder
if NFS support such "link" exporting and mounting?
Thanks.
Frank Tu
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: permission denied.
2002-11-21 20:42 permission denied Rongqing "Frank" Tu
@ 2002-11-21 23:34 ` Neil Brown
2002-11-22 16:11 ` Rongqing "Frank" Tu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Neil Brown @ 2002-11-21 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rongqing "Frank" Tu; +Cc: nfs
On Thursday November 21, rtu@packetgeneral.com wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am running on Linux 2.4.18-3 and try to setup a "link" nfs, but got a
> "permission denied".
>
> a link nfs is like this:
> in machine 1: export A
> in machine 2: mount A to B and then export B
> in mahcine 3: mount B to C.
>
> the "permission denied" occurs at the last step when I tried to mount B to
> C.
>
> I am working on a software which needs this kind of structure, so I wonder
> if NFS support such "link" exporting and mounting?
re-exporting NFS filesystems is not supported and it is unlikely that
it will be. Partly there are protocol issues that make it an
unsolvable problem in general (though many specific cases can probably
be made to work). Partly there is usually a better solution to the
underlying problem.
One thing you could try if you were really set on this path is to use
the user-space nfs server aka "Universal NFS daemon" aka unfsd. This
can export any filesystem, but has speed and some reliability issues.
NeilBrown
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: permission denied.
2002-11-21 23:34 ` Neil Brown
@ 2002-11-22 16:11 ` Rongqing "Frank" Tu
2002-11-23 18:22 ` Bernd Schubert
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Rongqing "Frank" Tu @ 2002-11-22 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neil Brown; +Cc: nfs
Dear Neil,
Thank you for your help.
I don't think Universal NFS is suitable for my situation.
My situation is there is a linux box sitting between NFS server and end
users. This linux box will transfer the NFS server to the end user, so in
this linux box, I need to mount the NFS server, then export mounted point
to the end users.
NFS NFS
NFS_server ------> Linux_Box --------> end users
In the linux box, there are two commands:
mount -t nfs NFS_server:/path/dir /linux_box_path/dir
exportfs -ra
(in /etc/exports: /linux_box_path/dir *(rw) )
In the normal situation, such "link" exporting and mounting is not
necessary since the end user can directly mount the NFS server to itself,
but I need to add some functions in my Linux_Box and this becomes
necessary.
Are you very sure NFS protocol doesn't support such "link" exporting and
mounting?
Thanks.
Frank
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Neil Brown
wrote:
> On Thursday November 21, rtu@packetgeneral.com wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > I am running on Linux 2.4.18-3 and try to setup a "link" nfs, but got a
> > "permission denied".
> >
> > a link nfs is like this:
> > in machine 1: export A
> > in machine 2: mount A to B and then export B
> > in mahcine 3: mount B to C.
> >
> > the "permission denied" occurs at the last step when I tried to mount B to
> > C.
> >
> > I am working on a software which needs this kind of structure, so I wonder
> > if NFS support such "link" exporting and mounting?
>
> re-exporting NFS filesystems is not supported and it is unlikely that
> it will be. Partly there are protocol issues that make it an
> unsolvable problem in general (though many specific cases can probably
> be made to work). Partly there is usually a better solution to the
> underlying problem.
>
> One thing you could try if you were really set on this path is to use
> the user-space nfs server aka "Universal NFS daemon" aka unfsd. This
> can export any filesystem, but has speed and some reliability issues.
>
> NeilBrown
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: permission denied.
2002-11-22 16:11 ` Rongqing "Frank" Tu
@ 2002-11-23 18:22 ` Bernd Schubert
2002-11-24 3:03 ` Rongqing "Frank" Tu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Bernd Schubert @ 2002-11-23 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rongqing "Frank" Tu, Neil Brown; +Cc: nfs
On Friday 22 November 2002 17:11, Rongqing \"Frank\" Tu wrote:
> Dear Neil,
> Thank you for your help.
> I don't think Universal NFS is suitable for my situation.
>
Hi Frank,
Using any other user-space export daemon should also do what you want. So you
could try to use samba for example.
Bernd
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: permission denied.
2002-11-23 18:22 ` Bernd Schubert
@ 2002-11-24 3:03 ` Rongqing "Frank" Tu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Rongqing "Frank" Tu @ 2002-11-24 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bernd Schubert; +Cc: Neil Brown, nfs
Thanks.
I found the place to resolve the problem.
in the kernel code of nfsd, exp_export() in export.c, ignore the check of
fs flag of FS_REQUIRES_DEV.
inode->i_sb->s_type->fs_flags.
Frank
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> On Friday 22 November 2002 17:11, Rongqing \"Frank\" Tu wrote:
> > Dear Neil,
> > Thank you for your help.
> > I don't think Universal NFS is suitable for my situation.
> >
>
> Hi Frank,
>
> Using any other user-space export daemon should also do what you want. So you
> could try to use samba for example.
>
> Bernd
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Permission denied
@ 2003-05-07 15:47 Jeremy Sanders
2003-05-07 16:21 ` James Pearson
2003-05-07 16:31 ` Trond Myklebust
0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Sanders @ 2003-05-07 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nfs
I've seen this problem a couple of times (I think I reported it to the
list before but I can find the posting). Using the automounter to mount
home directories (rw,v3,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,hard,intr,udp,lock), it
seems that rebooting a Linux server can give a "Permission denied" on
the client. Further attempts at accessing the mountpoint give this error.
It can be fixed my umounting it (if nothing is using it), and reaccessing
the mountpoint.
The server is running RedHat's 2.4.18-27.7.x kernel, and the client is
using 2.4.18-17.7.x (unfortunately).
dmesg on the client shows:
nfs: server server.ast.cam.ac.uk not responding, still trying
nfs: task 57889 can't get a request slot
nfs: server server.ast.cam.ac.uk OK
nfs: server server.ast.cam.ac.uk OK
sendmail gave errors such as:
May 7 16:07:39 xserv1 sendmail[22255]: h47EwYl22254: forward
/home/gmorris: transient error: Timeout on file open
May 7 16:07:39 xserv1 sendmail[22195]: h47Eljl22194: forward
/home/gmorris: transient error: Timeout on file open
May 7 16:07:39 xserv1 sendmail[22255]: h47EwYl22254: forward
/home/gmorris/.forward: Permission denied
May 7 16:07:39 xserv1 sendmail[22195]: h47Eljl22194: forward
/home/gmorris/.forward: Permission denied
Any ideas? I suppose it's hard to diagnose this without a network traffic
analysis, and we're not using the standard kernel either. I suppose it
could be an automounter bug.
Jeremy
--
Jeremy Sanders <jss@ast.cam.ac.uk> http://www-xray.ast.cam.ac.uk/~jss/
X-Ray Group, Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, UK.
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: E1AAE053
-------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Permission denied
2003-05-07 15:47 Jeremy Sanders
@ 2003-05-07 16:21 ` James Pearson
2003-05-07 16:32 ` Jeremy Sanders
2003-05-07 16:31 ` Trond Myklebust
1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: James Pearson @ 2003-05-07 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeremy Sanders; +Cc: nfs
What version of nfs-utils are you running on the server?
I had a problem if the server crashed before a client mount could be
recorded to /var/lib/nfs/rmtab, the client got permission denied on the
mount point after the server rebooted - see:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-nfs&m=101828003630443&w=2
This is fixed in the more recent versions of nfs-utils.
Also, if you manually attempt to umount an NFS file system (automounted
or not), but the umount fails because the file system is busy - this
will cause a problem as rpc.mountd on the server has already removed the
client from /var/lib/nfs/rmtab - which means if the server reboots, the
server has no record of the client mount, so you get permission denied
on client when it accesses the mount point ... see:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-nfs&m=104558814532107&w=2
I had this problem - my work round is not to manually umount automounted
file systems ... (or, if I have to, use a hacked version of umount that
doesn't contact rpc.mountd on the server).
James Pearson
Jeremy Sanders wrote:
>
> I've seen this problem a couple of times (I think I reported it to the
> list before but I can find the posting). Using the automounter to mount
> home directories (rw,v3,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,hard,intr,udp,lock), it
> seems that rebooting a Linux server can give a "Permission denied" on
> the client. Further attempts at accessing the mountpoint give this error.
> It can be fixed my umounting it (if nothing is using it), and reaccessing
> the mountpoint.
>
> The server is running RedHat's 2.4.18-27.7.x kernel, and the client is
> using 2.4.18-17.7.x (unfortunately).
>
> dmesg on the client shows:
>
> nfs: server server.ast.cam.ac.uk not responding, still trying
> nfs: task 57889 can't get a request slot
> nfs: server server.ast.cam.ac.uk OK
> nfs: server server.ast.cam.ac.uk OK
>
> sendmail gave errors such as:
>
> May 7 16:07:39 xserv1 sendmail[22255]: h47EwYl22254: forward
> /home/gmorris: transient error: Timeout on file open
> May 7 16:07:39 xserv1 sendmail[22195]: h47Eljl22194: forward
> /home/gmorris: transient error: Timeout on file open
> May 7 16:07:39 xserv1 sendmail[22255]: h47EwYl22254: forward
> /home/gmorris/.forward: Permission denied
> May 7 16:07:39 xserv1 sendmail[22195]: h47Eljl22194: forward
> /home/gmorris/.forward: Permission denied
>
> Any ideas? I suppose it's hard to diagnose this without a network traffic
> analysis, and we're not using the standard kernel either. I suppose it
> could be an automounter bug.
>
> Jeremy
>
> --
> Jeremy Sanders <jss@ast.cam.ac.uk> http://www-xray.ast.cam.ac.uk/~jss/
> X-Ray Group, Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, UK.
> Public Key Server PGP Key ID: E1AAE053
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
> The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
> www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
-------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Permission denied
2003-05-07 15:47 Jeremy Sanders
2003-05-07 16:21 ` James Pearson
@ 2003-05-07 16:31 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-07 16:34 ` Jeremy Sanders
1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Trond Myklebust @ 2003-05-07 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeremy Sanders; +Cc: nfs
>>>>> " " == Jeremy Sanders <jss@ast.cam.ac.uk> writes:
> I've seen this problem a couple of times (I think I reported it
> to the list before but I can find the posting). Using the
> automounter to mount home directories
> (rw,v3,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,hard,intr,udp,lock), it seems that
> rebooting a Linux server can give a "Permission denied" on the
> client.
Can it be duplicated on newer kernels?
Which automounter BTW?
Cheers,
Trond
-------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Permission denied
2003-05-07 16:21 ` James Pearson
@ 2003-05-07 16:32 ` Jeremy Sanders
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Sanders @ 2003-05-07 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Pearson; +Cc: nfs
On Wed, 7 May 2003, James Pearson wrote:
> What version of nfs-utils are you running on the server?
nfs-utils-0.3.3 on both. From the thread this looks like it has the bug
(unless RedHat patched it in their rpm). I'll have a go updating it and
see whether we still get the bug.
> Also, if you manually attempt to umount an NFS file system (automounted
> or not), but the umount fails because the file system is busy - this
> will cause a problem as rpc.mountd on the server has already removed the
> client from /var/lib/nfs/rmtab - which means if the server reboots, the
> server has no record of the client mount, so you get permission denied
> on client when it accesses the mount point ... see:
That's interesting. Thanks!
Jeremy
--
Jeremy Sanders <jss@ast.cam.ac.uk> http://www-xray.ast.cam.ac.uk/~jss/
X-Ray Group, Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, UK.
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: E1AAE053
-------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Permission denied
2003-05-07 16:31 ` Trond Myklebust
@ 2003-05-07 16:34 ` Jeremy Sanders
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Sanders @ 2003-05-07 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Trond Myklebust; +Cc: nfs
On Wed, 7 May 2003, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Can it be duplicated on newer kernels?
I'm not sure. I couldn't reproduce the problem when rebooting machines by
hand, and I don't think I can do much testing with the production
machines as I can't easily upgrade the kernel. I'll invesitgate this.
> Which automounter BTW?
autofs-3.1.7
Thanks, Jeremy
--
Jeremy Sanders <jss@ast.cam.ac.uk> http://www-xray.ast.cam.ac.uk/~jss/
X-Ray Group, Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, UK.
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: E1AAE053
-------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Permission denied
@ 2006-02-07 11:34 Daniel Bramkamp
2006-02-07 11:52 ` Tradebit Service
[not found] ` <20060220112535.GA10567@janus>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Bramkamp @ 2006-02-07 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nfs
Hi list,
I am experiencing some issues with a NFS server running on Linux Kernel
2.4.26 with nfs-utils-1.0.6 installed. Basically it works great,
however, sometimes access to files and directories stored on the server
is denied for a certain user account. I am not sure if it affects other
users as well - only heard complaints from that particular user so far.
This happens very infrequently. They mainly use KDE's Konqueror to
access the NFS shares but the problem affects Gnome's Nautilus and the
KDE konsole as well. Any ideas what could cause this weird behaviour ?
TIA
--
Daniel Bramkamp
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: Permission denied
2006-02-07 11:34 Permission denied Daniel Bramkamp
@ 2006-02-07 11:52 ` Tradebit Service
2006-02-07 13:04 ` Daniel Bramkamp
[not found] ` <20060220112535.GA10567@janus>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Tradebit Service @ 2006-02-07 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nfs
> great, however, sometimes access to files and directories
> stored on the server is denied for a certain user account. I
> am not sure if it affects other users as well - only heard
> complaints from that particular user so far.
daniel,
just a wild guess: did you compare the user IDs in /etc/shadow
on both systems?
if you do a "ls -l" on the files on the client, who is the owner
and what are the access flags?
eg:
-rw-rw-r-- 1 ftp users 28076 Dec 19 18:59 somefile.tgz
that would mean, that only the user "ftp" and the members of the
group "users" could write (and delete) the file.
compare these flags and ownerships on both systems.
Cheers!
--
Ralf Schwoebel
http://www.tradebit.com/
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: Permission denied
2006-02-07 11:52 ` Tradebit Service
@ 2006-02-07 13:04 ` Daniel Bramkamp
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Bramkamp @ 2006-02-07 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nfs
Quoting Tradebit Service <info@tradebit.com>:
>
>> great, however, sometimes access to files and directories
>> stored on the server is denied for a certain user account. I
>> am not sure if it affects other users as well - only heard
>> complaints from that particular user so far.
>
> daniel,
Hi Ralf,
thanks for your reply.
> just a wild guess: did you compare the user IDs in /etc/shadow
> on both systems?
sorry, I should have added this to my orginal post. The user accounts
are managed via LDAP. UIDs start at 10000 and they do not overlap with
system accounts. Also, when the problem arises, access to all NFS
shares is denied, not just a single directory or file.
--
Daniel Bramkamp
team! datentechnik GmbH & Co.KG
Werner von Siemens Stra=DFe 12a
49124 Georgsmarienh=FCtte
Tel.: 05401-8226-0
Fax : 05401-8226-20
eMail: bramkamp@team-datentechnik.de
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Permission denied
[not found] ` <20060220112535.GA10567@janus>
@ 2006-02-20 12:16 ` Daniel Bramkamp
2006-02-20 14:31 ` Trond Myklebust
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Bramkamp @ 2006-02-20 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nfs
Quoting Frank van Maarseveen <frankvm@frankvm.com>:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 12:34:48PM +0100, Daniel Bramkamp wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I am experiencing some issues with a NFS server running on Linux Kernel
>> 2.4.26 with nfs-utils-1.0.6 installed. Basically it works great,
>> however, sometimes access to files and directories stored on the server
>> is denied for a certain user account. I am not sure if it affects other
>> users as well - only heard complaints from that particular user so far.
>
> A bit late but.. is that user a member of more than 16 groups?
Hi,
yesterday I reinstalled the server. The server is now running Gentoo
instead of Slackware. The installed software is up to date now. Kernel
is 2.6.14, nfs-utils is still 1.0.6, it seems 1.0.8 is currently a
realease candidate. Half an hour ago I got a call from the user - the
problem still exists. The user is a member of 13 groups. I really hoped
the update would solve the problem since I have no idea how to fix this.
--
Daniel Bramkamp
team! datentechnik GmbH & Co.KG
Werner von Siemens Stra=DFe 12a
49124 Georgsmarienh=FCtte
Tel.: 05401-8226-0
Fax : 05401-8226-20
eMail: bramkamp@team-datentechnik.de
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Permission denied
2006-02-20 12:16 ` Daniel Bramkamp
@ 2006-02-20 14:31 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-02-20 15:43 ` Daniel Bramkamp
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Trond Myklebust @ 2006-02-20 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Bramkamp; +Cc: nfs
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 13:16 +0100, Daniel Bramkamp wrote:
> Quoting Frank van Maarseveen <frankvm@frankvm.com>:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 12:34:48PM +0100, Daniel Bramkamp wrote:
> >> Hi list,
> >>
> >> I am experiencing some issues with a NFS server running on Linux Kernel
> >> 2.4.26 with nfs-utils-1.0.6 installed. Basically it works great,
> >> however, sometimes access to files and directories stored on the server
> >> is denied for a certain user account. I am not sure if it affects other
> >> users as well - only heard complaints from that particular user so far.
> >
> > A bit late but.. is that user a member of more than 16 groups?
>
> Hi,
>
> yesterday I reinstalled the server. The server is now running Gentoo
> instead of Slackware. The installed software is up to date now. Kernel
> is 2.6.14, nfs-utils is still 1.0.6, it seems 1.0.8 is currently a
> realease candidate. Half an hour ago I got a call from the user - the
> problem still exists. The user is a member of 13 groups. I really hoped
> the update would solve the problem since I have no idea how to fix this.
You have to look at the client machine too.
Is the user still limited to 13 groups on the client, and do the
numerical uid/gid values match on the client and server?
Cheers,
Trond
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Permission denied
2006-02-20 14:31 ` Trond Myklebust
@ 2006-02-20 15:43 ` Daniel Bramkamp
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Bramkamp @ 2006-02-20 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nfs
Quoting Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>:
> You have to look at the client machine too.
yeah, the client in this case is a terminal server.
> Is the user still limited to 13 groups on the client, and do the
> numerical uid/gid values match on the client and server?
Since I use LDAP to store user accounts the uid and gid is the same on
all servers. The user is not a member of any local group on any server
either so the total number of groups the particular user is in is 13 on
all servers. I just double checked that.
--
Daniel Bramkamp
team! datentechnik GmbH & Co.KG
Werner von Siemens Stra=DFe 12a
49124 Georgsmarienh=FCtte
Tel.: 05401-8226-0
Fax : 05401-8226-20
eMail: bramkamp@team-datentechnik.de
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-20 15:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-07 11:34 Permission denied Daniel Bramkamp
2006-02-07 11:52 ` Tradebit Service
2006-02-07 13:04 ` Daniel Bramkamp
[not found] ` <20060220112535.GA10567@janus>
2006-02-20 12:16 ` Daniel Bramkamp
2006-02-20 14:31 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-02-20 15:43 ` Daniel Bramkamp
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-07 15:47 Jeremy Sanders
2003-05-07 16:21 ` James Pearson
2003-05-07 16:32 ` Jeremy Sanders
2003-05-07 16:31 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-07 16:34 ` Jeremy Sanders
2002-11-21 20:42 permission denied Rongqing "Frank" Tu
2002-11-21 23:34 ` Neil Brown
2002-11-22 16:11 ` Rongqing "Frank" Tu
2002-11-23 18:22 ` Bernd Schubert
2002-11-24 3:03 ` Rongqing "Frank" Tu
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.