All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Michael Cheng <michael.cheng@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: lucas.demarchi@intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 1/6] drm: Add arch arm64 for drm_clflush_virt_range
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 16:28:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <011a236d-7ed4-0d48-e8a6-c9bd98740d5b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220225032436.904942-2-michael.cheng@intel.com>


On 25/02/2022 03:24, Michael Cheng wrote:
> Add arm64 support for drm_clflush_virt_range. caches_clean_inval_pou
> performs a flush by first performing a clean, follow by an invalidation
> operation.
> 
> v2 (Michael Cheng): Use correct macro for cleaning and invalidation the
> 		    dcache. Thanks Tvrtko for the suggestion.
> 
> v3 (Michael Cheng): Replace asm/cacheflush.h with linux/cacheflush.h
> 
> v4 (Michael Cheng): Arm64 does not export dcache_clean_inval_poc as a
> 		    symbol that could be use by other modules, thus use
> 		    caches_clean_inval_pou instead. Also this version
> 	            removes include for cacheflush, since its already
> 		    included base on architecture type.

What does it mean that it is included based on architecture type? Some 
of the other header already pulls it in?

Regards,

Tvrtko

> Signed-off-by: Michael Cheng <michael.cheng@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c | 5 +++++
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c
> index c3e6e615bf09..81c28714f930 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c
> @@ -174,6 +174,11 @@ drm_clflush_virt_range(void *addr, unsigned long length)
>   
>   	if (wbinvd_on_all_cpus())
>   		pr_err("Timed out waiting for cache flush\n");
> +
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> +	void *end = addr + length;
> +	caches_clean_inval_pou((unsigned long)addr, (unsigned long)end);
> +
>   #else
>   	WARN_ONCE(1, "Architecture has no drm_cache.c support\n");
>   #endif

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Michael Cheng <michael.cheng@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com, wayne.boyer@intel.com,
	casey.g.bowman@intel.com, lucas.demarchi@intel.com,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/6] drm: Add arch arm64 for drm_clflush_virt_range
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 16:28:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <011a236d-7ed4-0d48-e8a6-c9bd98740d5b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220225032436.904942-2-michael.cheng@intel.com>


On 25/02/2022 03:24, Michael Cheng wrote:
> Add arm64 support for drm_clflush_virt_range. caches_clean_inval_pou
> performs a flush by first performing a clean, follow by an invalidation
> operation.
> 
> v2 (Michael Cheng): Use correct macro for cleaning and invalidation the
> 		    dcache. Thanks Tvrtko for the suggestion.
> 
> v3 (Michael Cheng): Replace asm/cacheflush.h with linux/cacheflush.h
> 
> v4 (Michael Cheng): Arm64 does not export dcache_clean_inval_poc as a
> 		    symbol that could be use by other modules, thus use
> 		    caches_clean_inval_pou instead. Also this version
> 	            removes include for cacheflush, since its already
> 		    included base on architecture type.

What does it mean that it is included based on architecture type? Some 
of the other header already pulls it in?

Regards,

Tvrtko

> Signed-off-by: Michael Cheng <michael.cheng@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c | 5 +++++
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c
> index c3e6e615bf09..81c28714f930 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c
> @@ -174,6 +174,11 @@ drm_clflush_virt_range(void *addr, unsigned long length)
>   
>   	if (wbinvd_on_all_cpus())
>   		pr_err("Timed out waiting for cache flush\n");
> +
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> +	void *end = addr + length;
> +	caches_clean_inval_pou((unsigned long)addr, (unsigned long)end);
> +
>   #else
>   	WARN_ONCE(1, "Architecture has no drm_cache.c support\n");
>   #endif

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-25 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-25  3:24 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 0/6] Use drm_clflush* instead of clflush Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  3:24 ` Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  3:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 1/6] drm: Add arch arm64 for drm_clflush_virt_range Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  3:24   ` Michael Cheng
2022-02-25 16:28   ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2022-02-25 16:28     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-25 16:52     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michael Cheng
2022-02-25 16:52       ` Michael Cheng
2022-02-25 17:33       ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-25 17:33         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-25 17:40         ` [Intel-gfx] " Michael Cheng
2022-02-25 17:40           ` Michael Cheng
2022-02-25 18:19           ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-25 18:19             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-25 18:23             ` [Intel-gfx] " Michael Cheng
2022-02-25 18:23               ` Michael Cheng
2022-02-25 18:42               ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-25 18:42                 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-02-25 18:58                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-25 18:58                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-25 18:24   ` [Intel-gfx] " Robin Murphy
2022-02-25 18:24     ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-25 18:24     ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-25 19:27     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michael Cheng
2022-02-25 19:27       ` Michael Cheng
2022-03-02 12:49       ` [Intel-gfx] " Robin Murphy
2022-03-02 12:49         ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-02 12:49         ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-02 15:55         ` [Intel-gfx] " Michael Cheng
2022-03-02 15:55           ` Michael Cheng
2022-03-02 15:55           ` Michael Cheng
2022-03-02 17:06           ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher
2022-03-02 17:06             ` Alex Deucher
2022-03-02 17:06             ` Alex Deucher
2022-03-02 19:10           ` [Intel-gfx] " Robin Murphy
2022-03-02 19:10             ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-02 19:10             ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-07 16:52             ` [Intel-gfx] " Michael Cheng
2022-03-07 16:52               ` Michael Cheng
2022-03-07 16:52               ` Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  3:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 2/6] drm/i915/gt: Re-work intel_write_status_page Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  3:24   ` Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  3:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 3/6] drm/i915/gt: Drop invalidate_csb_entries Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  3:24   ` Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  3:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 4/6] drm/i915/gt: Re-work reset_csb Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  3:24   ` Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  3:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 5/6] drm/i915/: Re-work clflush_write32 Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  3:24   ` Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  3:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 6/6] drm/i915/gt: replace cache_clflush_range Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  3:24   ` Michael Cheng
2022-02-25  7:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Use drm_clflush* instead of clflush Patchwork
2022-02-25  7:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-25  7:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-02-26  1:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=011a236d-7ed4-0d48-e8a6-c9bd98740d5b@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=michael.cheng@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.