All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
To: 'Jaegeuk Kim' <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4 v2] f2fs: avoid unnecessary f2fs_gc for dir operations
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 09:32:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <013801d13deb$2ba86480$82f92d80$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151223185453.GA30505@jaegeuk.local>

Hi Jaegeuk,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 2:55 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4 v2] f2fs: avoid unnecessary f2fs_gc for dir operations
> 
> Chang log from v1:
>  - add more cases
> 
> From 9fea6346f5dd2992525e853e27a4fe899d122379 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:56:08 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: avoid unnecessary f2fs_gc for dir operations
> 
> The f2fs_balance_fs doesn't need to cover f2fs_new_inode or f2fs_find_entry
> works.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/namei.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/namei.c b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> index 2c32110..e4588f7 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> @@ -128,8 +128,6 @@ static int f2fs_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t
> mode,
>  	nid_t ino = 0;
>  	int err;
> 
> -	f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
> -
>  	inode = f2fs_new_inode(dir, mode);
>  	if (IS_ERR(inode))
>  		return PTR_ERR(inode);
> @@ -142,6 +140,8 @@ static int f2fs_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t
> mode,
>  	inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &f2fs_dblock_aops;
>  	ino = inode->i_ino;
> 
> +	f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
> +
>  	f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
>  	err = f2fs_add_link(dentry, inode);
>  	if (err)
> @@ -288,12 +288,13 @@ static int f2fs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
>  	int err = -ENOENT;
> 
>  	trace_f2fs_unlink_enter(dir, dentry);
> -	f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
> 
>  	de = f2fs_find_entry(dir, &dentry->d_name, &page);
>  	if (!de)
>  		goto fail;
> 
> +	f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
> +
>  	f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
>  	err = acquire_orphan_inode(sbi);
>  	if (err) {
> @@ -341,8 +342,6 @@ static int f2fs_symlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
>  	if (len > dir->i_sb->s_blocksize)
>  		return -ENAMETOOLONG;
> 
> -	f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
> -
>  	inode = f2fs_new_inode(dir, S_IFLNK | S_IRWXUGO);
>  	if (IS_ERR(inode))
>  		return PTR_ERR(inode);
> @@ -353,6 +352,8 @@ static int f2fs_symlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
>  		inode->i_op = &f2fs_symlink_inode_operations;
>  	inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &f2fs_dblock_aops;
> 
> +	f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
> +
>  	f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
>  	err = f2fs_add_link(dentry, inode);
>  	if (err)
> @@ -433,8 +434,6 @@ static int f2fs_mkdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t
> mode)
>  	struct inode *inode;
>  	int err;
> 
> -	f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
> -
>  	inode = f2fs_new_inode(dir, S_IFDIR | mode);
>  	if (IS_ERR(inode))
>  		return PTR_ERR(inode);
> @@ -444,6 +443,8 @@ static int f2fs_mkdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t
> mode)
>  	inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &f2fs_dblock_aops;
>  	mapping_set_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping, GFP_F2FS_HIGH_ZERO);
> 
> +	f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
> +
>  	set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_INC_LINK);
>  	f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
>  	err = f2fs_add_link(dentry, inode);
> @@ -481,8 +482,6 @@ static int f2fs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
>  	struct inode *inode;
>  	int err = 0;
> 
> -	f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
> -
>  	inode = f2fs_new_inode(dir, mode);
>  	if (IS_ERR(inode))
>  		return PTR_ERR(inode);
> @@ -490,6 +489,8 @@ static int f2fs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
>  	init_special_inode(inode, inode->i_mode, rdev);
>  	inode->i_op = &f2fs_special_inode_operations;
> 
> +	f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
> +
>  	f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
>  	err = f2fs_add_link(dentry, inode);
>  	if (err)
> @@ -516,9 +517,6 @@ static int __f2fs_tmpfile(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
>  	struct inode *inode;
>  	int err;
> 
> -	if (!whiteout)
> -		f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
> -
>  	inode = f2fs_new_inode(dir, mode);
>  	if (IS_ERR(inode))
>  		return PTR_ERR(inode);
> @@ -530,6 +528,8 @@ static int __f2fs_tmpfile(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
>  		inode->i_op = &f2fs_file_inode_operations;
>  		inode->i_fop = &f2fs_file_operations;
>  		inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &f2fs_dblock_aops;
> +
> +		f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
>  	}
> 
>  	f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
> @@ -604,8 +604,6 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> 
> -	f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
> -
>  	old_entry = f2fs_find_entry(old_dir, &old_dentry->d_name, &old_page);
>  	if (!old_entry)
>  		goto out;
> @@ -635,6 +633,8 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
>  		if (!new_entry)
>  			goto out_whiteout;
> 
> +		f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);

If we are in RENAME_WHITEOUT case, move f2fs_balance_fs here seems a bit late.
How about let __f2fs_tmpfile do reclaim for both whiteout and tmpfile case
itself, and do reclaim exclude whiteout case here?

Thanks,

> +
>  		f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
> 
>  		err = acquire_orphan_inode(sbi);
> @@ -666,6 +666,8 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
>  		update_inode_page(old_inode);
>  		update_inode_page(new_inode);
>  	} else {
> +		f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
> +
>  		f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
> 
>  		err = f2fs_add_link(new_dentry, old_inode);
> @@ -763,8 +765,6 @@ static int f2fs_cross_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry
> *old_dentry,
>  								new_inode)))
>  		return -EPERM;
> 
> -	f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
> -
>  	old_entry = f2fs_find_entry(old_dir, &old_dentry->d_name, &old_page);
>  	if (!old_entry)
>  		goto out;
> @@ -807,6 +807,8 @@ static int f2fs_cross_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry
> *old_dentry,
>  			goto out_new_dir;
>  	}
> 
> +	f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
> +
>  	f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
> 
>  	err = update_dent_inode(old_inode, new_inode, &new_dentry->d_name);
> --
> 2.5.4 (Apple Git-61)

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-24  1:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-23  0:59 [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: check inline_data flag at converting time Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-23  0:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: avoid unnecessary f2fs_gc for dir operations Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-23  0:59   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-23  3:26   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2015-12-23 18:54     ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-24  1:32       ` Chao Yu [this message]
2015-12-24  2:13         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-24  2:13           ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-24  3:30           ` Chao Yu
2015-12-23  0:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: record node block allocation in dnode_of_data Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-23  8:00   ` Chao Yu
2015-12-23  8:00     ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2015-12-23 18:57     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-23 19:00   ` [PATCH 3/4 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-23 19:00     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-24  1:35     ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2015-12-23  0:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: call f2fs_balance_fs only when node was changed Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-23  0:59   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-23  9:46   ` Chao Yu
2015-12-23  9:46     ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2015-12-23 19:13     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-25  1:38     ` Chao Yu
2015-12-25  1:38       ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2015-12-23 19:14   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-23 19:14     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-24  5:48     ` Chao Yu
2015-12-24  5:48       ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2015-12-23  3:19 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: check inline_data flag at converting time Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='013801d13deb$2ba86480$82f92d80$@samsung.com' \
    --to=chao2.yu@samsung.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.