From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
To: 'Jaegeuk Kim' <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: call f2fs_balance_fs only when node was changed
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:46:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <010b01d13d66$f85f2ac0$e91d8040$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450832388-29118-4-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Hi Jaegeuk,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 9:00 AM
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: call f2fs_balance_fs only when node was changed
>
> If user tries to update or read data, we don't need to call f2fs_balance_fs
> which triggers f2fs_gc, which increases unnecessary long latency.
One missing case is get_data_block_dio, how about also covering it based on
following patch?
>From 7175efac7473e7a04285055c69edfb7432f8ca4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:11:43 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: reduce covered region of sbi->cp_rwsem in
f2fs_map_blocks
Only cover sbi->cp_rwsem on one dnode page's allocation and modification
instead of multiple's in f2fs_map_blocks, it can reduce the covered region
of cp_rwsem, then we can avoid potential long time delay for concurrent
checkpointer.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
---
fs/f2fs/data.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index 8f8f8b0..3c83b16 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ int f2fs_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_map_blocks *map,
}
if (create)
- f2fs_lock_op(F2FS_I_SB(inode));
+ f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
/* When reading holes, we need its node page */
set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
@@ -651,6 +651,11 @@ get_next:
allocated = false;
f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
+ if (create) {
+ f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
+ f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
+ }
+
set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
err = get_dnode_of_data(&dn, pgofs, mode);
if (err) {
@@ -706,7 +711,7 @@ put_out:
f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
unlock_out:
if (create)
- f2fs_unlock_op(F2FS_I_SB(inode));
+ f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
out:
trace_f2fs_map_blocks(inode, map, err);
return err;
--
2.6.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
To: 'Jaegeuk Kim' <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: call f2fs_balance_fs only when node was changed
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:46:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <010b01d13d66$f85f2ac0$e91d8040$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450832388-29118-4-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Hi Jaegeuk,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 9:00 AM
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: call f2fs_balance_fs only when node was changed
>
> If user tries to update or read data, we don't need to call f2fs_balance_fs
> which triggers f2fs_gc, which increases unnecessary long latency.
One missing case is get_data_block_dio, how about also covering it based on
following patch?
>From 7175efac7473e7a04285055c69edfb7432f8ca4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:11:43 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: reduce covered region of sbi->cp_rwsem in
f2fs_map_blocks
Only cover sbi->cp_rwsem on one dnode page's allocation and modification
instead of multiple's in f2fs_map_blocks, it can reduce the covered region
of cp_rwsem, then we can avoid potential long time delay for concurrent
checkpointer.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
---
fs/f2fs/data.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index 8f8f8b0..3c83b16 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ int f2fs_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_map_blocks *map,
}
if (create)
- f2fs_lock_op(F2FS_I_SB(inode));
+ f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
/* When reading holes, we need its node page */
set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
@@ -651,6 +651,11 @@ get_next:
allocated = false;
f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
+ if (create) {
+ f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
+ f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
+ }
+
set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
err = get_dnode_of_data(&dn, pgofs, mode);
if (err) {
@@ -706,7 +711,7 @@ put_out:
f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
unlock_out:
if (create)
- f2fs_unlock_op(F2FS_I_SB(inode));
+ f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
out:
trace_f2fs_map_blocks(inode, map, err);
return err;
--
2.6.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-23 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-23 0:59 [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: check inline_data flag at converting time Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-23 0:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: avoid unnecessary f2fs_gc for dir operations Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-23 0:59 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-23 3:26 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2015-12-23 18:54 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-24 1:32 ` Chao Yu
2015-12-24 2:13 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-24 2:13 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-24 3:30 ` Chao Yu
2015-12-23 0:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: record node block allocation in dnode_of_data Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-23 8:00 ` Chao Yu
2015-12-23 8:00 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2015-12-23 18:57 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-23 19:00 ` [PATCH 3/4 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-23 19:00 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-24 1:35 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2015-12-23 0:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: call f2fs_balance_fs only when node was changed Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-23 0:59 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-23 9:46 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2015-12-23 9:46 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2015-12-23 19:13 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-25 1:38 ` Chao Yu
2015-12-25 1:38 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2015-12-23 19:14 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-23 19:14 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-24 5:48 ` Chao Yu
2015-12-24 5:48 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2015-12-23 3:19 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: check inline_data flag at converting time Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='010b01d13d66$f85f2ac0$e91d8040$@samsung.com' \
--to=chao2.yu@samsung.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.