All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@laronde.org>
To: "Richard Sandiford" <rsandifo@redhat.com>
Cc: <uclibc@uclibc.org>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols with nonzero symbol table entry st_value
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 16:36:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01a901c436ce$7029d890$8d01010a@prefect> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 878yg0m9db.fsf@redhat.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Sandiford" <rsandifo@redhat.com>
To: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@laronde.org>
Cc: <uclibc@uclibc.org>; <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols with nonzero symbol
table entry st_value


> "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@laronde.org> writes:
> > Even though it is pointing libdl to the libpthread stub for malloc,
should
> > it crash?
>
> Yeah.  When you call a stub, $gp must already be set to the owning
> object's _gp.  That's how the dynamic loader knows which GOT to change.
>
> In your case, libdl will be calling libpthread's stub with $gp set to
> libdl's _gp.  The dynamic loader will therefore end up trying to change
> libdl's GOT, not libpthread's.

I read this in the spec:

    All externally visible symbols, both defined and undefined,
    must be hashed into the hash table.

Should libpthread's malloc stub be added to the hash table?  I guess not,
but I think that might be happening (haven't verified), and libdl finding it
in there and thinking it is the real deal, not realizing it is just a stub.


Regards,
Brad

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@laronde.org>
To: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>
Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols with nonzero symbol table entry st_value
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 16:36:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01a901c436ce$7029d890$8d01010a@prefect> (raw)
Message-ID: <20040510203614.TLrwhgaLIIu6JFZ259BqednfkQQHZnqXKgOAZZke_TI@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 878yg0m9db.fsf@redhat.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Sandiford" <rsandifo@redhat.com>
To: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@laronde.org>
Cc: <uclibc@uclibc.org>; <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols with nonzero symbol
table entry st_value


> "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@laronde.org> writes:
> > Even though it is pointing libdl to the libpthread stub for malloc,
should
> > it crash?
>
> Yeah.  When you call a stub, $gp must already be set to the owning
> object's _gp.  That's how the dynamic loader knows which GOT to change.
>
> In your case, libdl will be calling libpthread's stub with $gp set to
> libdl's _gp.  The dynamic loader will therefore end up trying to change
> libdl's GOT, not libpthread's.

I read this in the spec:

    All externally visible symbols, both defined and undefined,
    must be hashed into the hash table.

Should libpthread's malloc stub be added to the hash table?  I guess not,
but I think that might be happening (haven't verified), and libdl finding it
in there and thinking it is the real deal, not realizing it is just a stub.


Regards,
Brad

  reply	other threads:[~2004-05-10 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-03 21:25 uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols with nonzero symbol table entry st_value Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-03 21:25 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-09 13:14 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-05-09 13:14   ` Richard Sandiford
2004-05-09 20:52   ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-09 20:52     ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-10  7:40     ` Richard Sandiford
2004-05-10  7:40       ` Richard Sandiford
2004-05-10 18:05       ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-10 18:05         ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-10 18:21         ` Richard Sandiford
2004-05-10 18:21           ` Richard Sandiford
2004-05-10 20:36           ` Bradley D. LaRonde [this message]
2004-05-10 20:36             ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-10 20:41             ` Richard Sandiford
2004-05-10 20:41               ` Richard Sandiford
2004-05-10 20:44               ` Richard Sandiford
2004-05-10 20:44                 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-05-11  3:39               ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-11  3:39                 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-11  5:48                 ` [uClibc] Re: uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols with nonzerosymbol " Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-11  5:48                   ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-11 14:03                 ` uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols with nonzero symbol " Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-11 14:21                   ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-11 14:21                     ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-11 14:23                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-11 16:33                     ` [uClibc] Re: uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols with nonzerosymbol " Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-11 16:33                       ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-11 16:55                       ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-11 16:55                         ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2004-05-11 21:50                         ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-11 21:50                           ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-10 12:21     ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-10 12:21       ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-10 12:36       ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-10 12:36         ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-10 14:23         ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-10 14:23           ` Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-11  7:27           ` [uClibc] Re: uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols withnonzerosymbol " Joakim Tjernlund
2004-05-11  7:27             ` Joakim Tjernlund

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='01a901c436ce$7029d890$8d01010a@prefect' \
    --to=brad@laronde.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=rsandifo@redhat.com \
    --cc=uclibc@uclibc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.